Get the lead out: Federal bill would test for lead in children, provide treatment

Get the lead out: Federal bill would test for lead in children, provide treatment

Get the lead out: Federal bill would test for lead in children, provide treatment
A new bill proposed in the House of Representatives seeks to allocate $150 million – a 1,000 percent increase – to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to fund nationwide lead poisoning prevention, detection and treatment.

The bill, the SMART Child Act, stands for “screen, manage, address and remove toxins for children,” Representative Rosa DeLauro (D-Connecticut) told reporters Monday in New Haven, according to WTNH.

Over four million children across the nation are regularly exposed to high levels of lead.

“Lead poisoning is a crisis in this country,” DeLauro said. “I do not say that lightly.”

Hundreds of children a year suffer lead poisoning in New Haven alone. http://bit.ly/2uvNEqn?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter_WTNH 

Photo published for New bill would increase funding for lead testing and treatment

New bill would increase funding for lead testing and treatment

Congressman Rosa DeLauro announced details of a new bill aimed at getting more money for lead testing and treatment.

wtnh.com

Lead poisoning can be devastating. Even a small amount of lead can slow a child’s mental and development growth. Large amounts of lead poisoning can cause severe effects on the blood and brain function.

Money from the bill would pay for educating families and communities on ways to prevent children from being exposed to lead, for managing cases for children who have been diagnosed with lead poisoning, and for blood tests and other screening measures, according to DeLauro.

The only way to definitively detect lead poisoning is via blood testing, and the measure recommends testing 1-2 year-olds, DeLauro said.

The congresswoman cited recent cuts in federal funding for lead poisoning prevention as an impetus for drafting the bill.

In 2005, the federal government created a program to combat lead poisoning, but funding dropped from $35 million to $2 million from 2011 to 2012.

The program was only allotted $17 million in the 2017 federal budget. That is not nearly enough money to effectively prevent and treat lead poisoning across the US, according to DeLauro.

Even the $150 million in additional funds promised by the bill is not enough to appropriately combat the “crisis” of lead poisoning nationwide, she said. However, it represents an improvement from the current situation.

The lead contamination crisis in Flint, Michigan illustrated the devastating impacts of untreated water and old lead pipes which led to the poisoning of 9,000 children.

In June, five officials in the state were charged with manslaughter, among them, the head of the health department.

Lead poisoning can also come from inhaling or eating lead paint, which has been outlawed for 40 years. It can become airborne when it starts to chip, especially in old houses.

Over 80 percent of homes in New Haven, for instance, were built before 1978, when lead was still commonly used in pipes and paint.

More than 300 children in the city are diagnosed annually with blood lead levels past 5 micrograms per deciliter, according to the Yale-New Haven Children’s Hospital Lead Treatment Center, according to the New Haven Independent. Many doctors consider 5 micrograms of lead per deciliter of blood the threshold for lead poisoning.

DeLauro stressed the importance of prevention because the effects of lead poisoning cannot be reversed. There is no safe level of lead in the body.

She introduced the bill last Wednesday.

One comment

  • uhm

    They told you that they’d taken out lead from paint and fuel in order to save your childrens’ brains and intelligence levels right? So ask yourself why they really removed lead from much of the environment and rest assured the answer isn’t a care about you. Just one of many reasons they moved lead was to help suit their modern day surveillance state since lead is excellent at blocking out snooping so would you want lead in walls, windows of houses as well as floating around in the atmosphere? Do you think your WiFi radiation weapons would have as good as an effect as they do today if lead was still around as it once was? Now if they decide it’s time to detox the human body of lead then rest assured the nano-dust they’re using as a human antenna may be suffering in its transmissions back out to those watching. This Variable Terrain Radio Parabolic Equation system must have nothing in its way of doing the tyrannical agenda it was devised to do. What did they put in petrol after they removed lead? The chemical known as benezine which increases your chances of getting cancer since the substance is carcinogenic and now aerosolized on every common way (highway in admiralty law legalese fraud speak) [you should pray for cheap electric cars sooner than later]. Since taking lead out the water, paint and fuel they’ve added more intelligence killing chemicals into the environment and humans than ever. Take a study into the negative effects of just fluoride on intelligence but they won’t remove that apathy bio-weapon will they? Why? It suits their agenda and doesn’t collide with any superior part of that agenda unlike lead once did. To those who suffer from electro-smog you might like to source some lead paint sometime and laced your home with it to protect you from this continual microwave radiation from these silent weapons for quiet wars. On top of that you might also find that lead paint didn’t fit in well with the planned obsolescence agenda and lead removal may have contributed to the further demise in the quality and longevity of paint, the final assault was the remove of anti-oxidants. Didn’t you ever wonder why brand new paint goes from white to dirty brown like its ten years old or more in just six months?

    ☆´¨)
    .·´ ¸.·★¨) ¸.·☆¨)
    ★(¸.·´ (¸.*´ ¸.·´
    `·-☆ The Unhived Mind

Leave a Reply