Scientists have new plan to fight global warming: Dimming the sun

Scientists have new plan to fight global warming: Dimming the sun

Scientists have new plan to fight global warming: Dimming the sun
Scientists have come up with a new and ingenious way of fighting global warming: use chemicals to blot out the sun. Whether we’ll then have to fight (and do everything else) in the shade, the research doesn’t quite spell out.

Since the world can’t seem to agree on reducing CO2 emissions, why not tackle the problem from the other end, scientists from Harvard and Yale have surmised. The researchers recently published a study which says that spraying large amounts of sulfate particles into the Earth’s lower stratosphere in order to literally dim out the sun could cut the effects of global climate change in half, and it might even be cheap!

With all the excitement over the “hypothetical” and “highly uncertain and ambitious” plan, there are no guarantees that it will not actually make things worse in a catastrophic sort of way. There is a suspicious lack of information about what ‘dimming the sun’ could possibly do to those of us who rely on it for basic things – like growing food, or not freezing to death.

Instead, the study published in Environmental Research Letters discusses the potential costs and necessary technology to realize the ambitious, if not hubristic, plan. The researchers discuss a variety of potential ways to accomplish the large-scale ‘geoengineering’ project: planes, balloons, or even just shooting chemicals in the air with large guns.

Carpe Donktum🔹@Carpedonktum

Scientists: We need to dim the sun to avoid a climate change disaster
Me: Is it gonna rain tomorrow?
Scientists: Weather is an extremely complicated system, I can only give my best guess.
Me: Leave the Fucking Sun alone.

248 people are talking about this

Even apart from that, there’s a fairly serious problem with the proposal: no aircraft currently exists that could actually deliver the payload. Adapting an existing version of SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy rocket has been ruled out, citing the cost.

The proposal suggests a launch could be accomplished within 15 years, with an initial cost of around $3.5 billion, followed by another 15-year running period costing an additional $2.5 billion – a relatively low price given the scale and significance of the project, they argue. An initial fleet of eight ships would initially expand to nearly 100 in order to deploy the necessary amount of chemicals around the world.

There are other less technical drawbacks to the proposal as well. Among the most obvious is that the plan would require international coordination between numerous countries, including the United States – whose president, Donald Trump, regularly expresses doubt about climate change in general.

Donald J. Trump


Brutal and Extended Cold Blast could shatter ALL RECORDS – Whatever happened to Global Warming?

117K people are talking about this

Dr Phil Williamson, an Honorary Reader at University of East Anglia, critiqued the proposal, saying that nations which “continued to experience extreme climate events” might then “consider that solar geoengineering had been responsible” and would need to be compensated. In other words, cutting the earth off from the heavens might be a real liability issue.

Others have critiqued the strategy for being a band-aid response that ignores the actual causes of the problem.

One comment

  • uhm

    There’s no global warming the Earth has been cooling since 1993 and Co2 has nothing to do with it certainly not mans output which is mostly reabsorbed. How can the world be warming when the Sun’s power has deminished dramatically to what is now causing transitioning into an Ice-age? Each year we’re now seeing world records broken for cold winters. Let me also remind you that whilst you once worried about the ozone layer when you really didn’t need to, if they continue to use these sulfates then you’ll really need to worry about ozone holes right over the top of you. Start to monitor trees and their bark for siigns of ozone holes in your areas. When people worried about the two ozone holes at the poles of the planet they really didn’t need to since this was natural. When there isn’t enough oxygen from the ground from plant life etc then ozone cannot be made. Oxygen rises into the atmosphere and it hits the UV of the Sun which produces ozone like an old photocopier. So whilst idiots fell for that cfc scam now they don’t even think of ozone holes but this time they’ll be over head. They’ve been spraying these chemicals into the atmosphere now on a large scale since 1993 but the truth is that they’ve been geoengineering the skies since 1976.

    .·´ ¸.·★¨) ¸.·☆¨)
    ★(¸.·´ (¸.*´ ¸.·´
    `·-☆ The Unhived Mind

Leave a Reply