‘Immediately folded’: Doctor Who writer dumped from BBC anthology over views on transgenderism

‘Immediately folded’: Doctor Who writer dumped from BBC anthology over views on transgenderism

'Immediately folded': Doctor Who writer dumped from BBC anthology over views on transgenderism
A screenwriter for the Doctor Who television series has had his work pulled from an upcoming anthology based on the show due to his views on transgenderism, igniting debate on censorship and companies caving in to pressure.

The book of Doctor Who short stories, which will be published by BBC Books, was not set to be announced until later this month – but the contribution from writer Gareth Roberts was leaked in advance and caused uproar among many LGBT activists, who began calling for it to be removed.

Some were even riled up and incensed by old jokes Roberts had posted on Twitter in 2017 about transgender women and the “glamorous” names they choose. To add insult to injury, other contributors even threatened to withdraw if Roberts was involved.

Conservative British journalist Toby Young drew attention to the decision on Twitter, calling it an “affront to free speech” by a “publicly-owned company.”

BBC Books is not publicly owned, however, but is a subsidiary of Penguin Random House, in which the BBC is a minority shareholder.

Toby Young

@toadmeister

This is shocking. It’s one thing for a commercial publisher to muzzle an author for their dissenting views on transgenderism. But for BBC Books to do it — a publicly-owned company — is an affront to free speech. Why should everyone pay the license fee if some views are censored?

Gareth Roberts@OldRoberts953

“Statement on BBC Books and Transgenderism” by Gareth Roberts https://link.medium.com/DGIgVOs2eX 

309 people are talking about this

In a statement on the controversy, Roberts, who is gay himself, confirmed that BBC Books had “immediately folded” in the face of activists’ demands and had told him that, although he would be paid, his story would not be published as it could make the book “economically unviable.”

In the statement, Roberts wrote that, while he had always “rejected restrictive cultural gender stereotypes,” he also believes it is “impossible for a person to change their biological sex”and thinks nobody is “born in the wrong body.”

ALSO ON RT.COMProfessor suing university after being fired for ‘troubling’ views on gender dysphoria in kidsHe added that it was wrong to “medicalise children who don’t conform to gender stereotypes” and argued that his views on the topic are “neither extreme nor unusual.”

Debate raged on Twitter, however, where some were delighted to see Roberts’ work had been dropped from the book, citing his “transphobia” and commending BBC Books for ditching him.

David Cann 🔶@drwhofan_194

Well, Gareth Roberts has condemned himself with his own words in that statement. If you wanted resolute, concrete proof of his transphobia, there it is plainly laid out. I think that more than anything proves BBC Books correct in their decision.

29 people are talking about this

Others felt the controversy was being mis-framed as a free speech issue, saying that it was a simple case of fans and writers having “had enough” of him. His opinions are “not compatible with what the show preaches,” another added.

Ben Williams is in exam mode@wenbbilliams

Gareth Roberts being removed from the anthology is great, and should mean he is never allowed near the show again. Whatever your opinions on his writing his views are not compatible with what the show preaches.

See Ben Williams is in exam mode’s other Tweets

Some said that while they weren’t big fans, censoring or blacklisting writers for their opinions was a slippery slope. “There’s never been a time when blacklisting writers or other creatives for ideological reasons was a good thing,” one fellow writer tweeted.

David Llewellyn@TheDaiLlew

God knows I’ve grimaced at some of Gareth’s tweets, and I don’t think we’ll ever agree on this subject, but there’s never been a time when blacklisting writers or other creatives for ideological reasons was a good thing. There just hasn’t.

Gareth Roberts@OldRoberts953

“Statement on BBC Books and Transgenderism” by Gareth Roberts https://link.medium.com/DGIgVOs2eX 

17 people are talking about this

Martyn Havell@BadWilf

Sorry to hear this Gareth. I don’t always agree with you, but that’s life.
Personally, I enjoy your work and I’ll buy a copy of whatever you bring out next

See Martyn Havell’s other Tweets

Then there were those who called out the anti-Roberts activists, calling them “intolerant bullies” and “lunatics” who favor“mob rule”against people with differing opinions.

“Sad how those who like to think of themselves as ‘liberal’ are often the ones calling for boycotts & curtailing of free speech,” one mused.

Tom Spilsbury@TomSpilsbury

Sorry to read this, Gareth. Sad how those who like to think of themselves as ‘liberal’ are often the ones calling for boycotts & curtailing of free speech. I don’t agree with some of your views (I don’t suppose anyone agrees with anyone 100%) but I support your right to air them.

See Tom Spilsbury’s other Tweets

Leave a Reply