Harry Potter and the COEFFICIENT CLUB

People need to learn the truth about J.K Rowling’s. She’s an utter FRAUD and always has been. All the Harry Potter books were written by the wealthy Railroad speculator, RICHARD POTTER. Richard linked to the Rothschild’s and controlled by ultra powerful, Robert Cecil. Please note his daughter was called Beatrix and was a massive Socialist. She married Sidney Webb who was also a Socialist. They have played a massive role in the Socialism of the United States by the controlling Coefficient Club organised by Sidney. Now Rowling’s is not an author of these books she was simply an editor but trumped up as the author. Very devious craft books installing the craft into the minds of vulnerable children with predictive programming.

-The Unhived Mind


  • Tears as JK Rowling returns to where it began

    By Chris Hastings, Arts and Media Editor
    Last Updated: 1:36am GMT 26/12/2007

    She is haunted by the “ghosts” of her troubled past, fears losing those closest to her and finds the success of the Harry Potter books so astonishing that she sometimes feels it is all a dream.

    Despite being the most famous children’s author in the world and wealthier than the Queen, the author JK Rowling admits that she still cannot completely break free from her earlier poverty and the traumatic death of her mother.

    Describing her life before Harry Potter as a “mess”, the writer, who is worth more than half a billion pounds, talks candidly about how her experiences have shaped almost every aspect of the best-selling books.

    Taken back to the tiny front room of the rented Edinburgh tenement flat where she struggled to finish the first book, she bursts into tears at the memories it holds.

    Rowling was living on state benefits in the flat with her youngest daughter, Jessica, after the breakdown of her first marriage and was still grieving her mother, Anne, who died from multiple sclerosis before the book was completed.

    Choking back her emotions, she says: “It was my life and it was very hard and I didn’t know there was going to be this fairy-tale resolution. This room is full of ghosts.”

    The writer allowed herself to be filmed for an ITV documentary that followed her for a year as she completed the final book, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.

    She talks openly about her past and is persuaded to revisit her former home, which she rented after the failure of her marriage to a Portuguese journalist, Jorge Arantes. The writer, who had battled with depression, says the flat was “really where I turned my life around completely”.

    Even now she finds her success so remarkable that: “Some days I do feel like, ‘Is it real?’ ”

    The mother of two tells fellow writer James Runcie, who made the documentary: “I feel I really became myself here, in that everything was stripped away, I’d made such a mess of things. But that was freeing, so I just thought, ‘Well, I want to write’, and I wrote the book and what is the worst than can happen? It gets turned down by every publisher in Britain, big deal.”

    Rowling, who was 28 when she moved to Scotland in late 1993, also reveals that her mother’s terminal illness has heavily influenced the constant theme of death in her writing and talks of her decision not to kill off the boy wizard in his final battle with Voldemort. “In some ways it would have been a neat ending to kill him. But I felt that would have been a betrayal, because I wanted my hero, and he is my hero, to do what I think is the most noble thing. So he came back from war.”

    In another scene, Rowling and her sister Jo are shown looking at old photographs from their childhood in Gloucestershire. The pictures bring back a flood of memories and the girls joke about their “tragic childhood haircuts” and their clothes. Rowling now owns a £6.5 million Georgian home in Kensington, West London, a country house on the banks of the River Tay near Aberfeldy and another house in Edinburgh.

    In JK Rowling… A Year In The Life, the author is shown putting the finishing touches to the last book, which was released in July. In contrast to her earlier poverty, Rowling and her second husband, Dr Neil Murray, are shown flying to America by private jet so they can attend the book’s launch there.

    In another interview for the internet fan site The Leaky Cauldron, released last week, Rowling talks about her next project, a Harry Potter encyclopedia, which she warns might take 10 years to complete.

    She says: “I absolutely do intend to do it, but I can’t pretend I’m in a hurry right now. It’s going to be an awful lot of work, but I have kept everything.

    “There is no point in doing it unless it is amazing. The last thing I want to do is to rush something out”.

  • Coefficients Club: Window on the High Cabal?

    “H.G. Wells was one of the few socialists who claimed to see big business, and multinational corporations in particular, as the forerunners of a World Socialist State”

    Fall 1993

    Reprinted from The Project
    Fall 1993-Winter 93-94, Volume X, Number 4

    The Coefficients Club was organized by Beatrice Webb, the co-ruler of the Fabian Society with her husband Sidney Webb, to bring together the most powerful movers and shakers of the British Establishment with social critics and idealists to discuss and chart the future of British Empire and its relationship to social reform. Among other things, the accounts of its deliberations offered by such luminaries as Bertrand Russell and H. G. Wells prove beyond any doubt that Fabian Socialism, contrary to surface impressions that it was the enemy of the British Oligarchy, was one of the Oligarchy’s most prized instruments for world rule.

    Coefficients included:

    Sir Edward Grey,
    Bertrand Russell,
    Sidney and Beatrice Webb,
    Leo Maxse (who advocated war with Germany already in 1902),
    Clinton Dawkins of the City,
    Carlyon Bellairs of the Navy,
    Pember Reeves,
    W. A. S. Hewins,
    L. S. Amery,
    H. J. Mackinder,
    Lord Robert Cecil,
    Lord Arthur Balfour,
    Michael Sadler,
    Henry Newbolt,
    Lord Alfred Milner,
    John Hugh Smith,
    J. Birchenough of the City,
    Josiah Wedgwood (the single taxer),
    John Hugh Smith,
    Colonel Repington,
    F. S. Oliver, and
    C. F. G. Masterman.

    The main focus of the Webb’s Coefficients appeared to center on determining the strategy best suited to defending and expanding the “liberal” British Empire against the increasingly aggressive encroachments of Germany since it had become unified under the leadership of militarist Prussia in then recent decades. Wells and other idealists argued that “The British Empire . . . had to be the precursor of a world-state or nothing . . . It was possible for the Germans and Austrians to hold together in their Zollverein (tariff and trade bloc) because they were placed like a clenched fist in the centre of Europe. But the British Empire was like an open hand all over the world. It had no natural economic unity and it could maintain no artificial economic unity. Its essential unity must be a unity of great ideas embodied in the English speech and literature.” (Experiment in Autobiography by H. G. Wells, page 652.) Wells identified Coefficient member Edward Grey as a promoter of the opposing British strategy of provoking Germany to attack France, without adequate warning of consequent British intervention, so that Germany could be laid low sooner than later while the British Navy was still supreme. Lord Grey was the highly influential Foreign Minister for Britain in the years preceding WWI who persuaded a reluctant cabinet that Britain should enter the war because of German violation of Belgian neutrality. (Experiment in Autobiography by H. G. Wells page 659.)

    Though given a respectful hearing behind closed doors in the Coefficient Club, Wells and his “utopians” were temporarily overruled by the official British policy of meeting head-on the German threat to the traditional British orchestrated European “balance of power.” Britain, by aping the ultra-statist protectionist economics and severe militarism of Germany and by purposely setting-up entangling alliances, made the carnage of the Great War (WWI) inevitable. This was clear to the disapproving Bertrand Russell in 1902 and caused him to quit the Coefficients in a huff, informing Grey (not then in office) that his proposals would lead to war and tyranny.
    From The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell Volume I, page 230

    “…in 1902, I became a member of a small dining club called the Coefficients, got up by Sidney Webb for the purpose of considering political questions from a more or less Imperialist point of view. It was in this club that I first became acquainted with H. G. Wells, of whom I had never heard until then. His point of view was more sympathetic to me than that of any member. Most of the members, in fact, shocked me profoundly. I remember Amery’s eyes gleaming with blood-lust at the thought of a war with America, in which, as he said with exultation, we should have to arm the whole adult male population. One evening Sir Edward Grey (not then in office) made a speech advocating the policy of Entente, which had not yet been adopted by the Government. I stated my objections to the policy very forcibly, and pointed out the likelyhood of its leading to war, but no one agreed with me, so I resigned from the Club. It will be seen that I began my opposition to the first war at the earliest possible moment.”

    However, it appears that Wells’ “utopian” prescriptions for a British orchestrated World State were ultimately adopted with a vengeance once the lessons of WWI and WWII were learned and the unbearable costs of “official Empire” finally became clear to even the most stubborn Imperialists. It is less clear if Wells’ policies were adopted as a new facade for covert British Imperialism, a cynical rationalization for constant destabilization congruent with such covert rule, a sincere attempt to create a World State, or some combination of the three. Two views of Wells’ own motivations are also possible. When exposed to the reality and inner workings of the High Cabal of the British Empire through the Coefficients, did he consciously sell-out his idealistic belief in socialism and use his familiarity with radical socialist thought to tailor a cynical propaganda program useful to the “Great Pirates” (see the review of Buckminster Fuller’s Critical Path in this issue for the source of this new epithet we shall be applying to the conspiracy) upon whom his literary success depended . . . or was the process of boot licking subconscious? One thing is certain, H.G. Wells was one of the few socialists who claimed to see big business, and multinational corporations in particular, as the forerunners of a World Socialist State.

    In any case, Wells effectively described the policies in most respects still being effectuated by the Anglo-American Elite. Students of the ruling class/conspiracy need to study Wells’ work in detail if they want to know where we are headed and why. The best statement of H. G. Wells’ “utopian” program for moving from World Imperialism to World Government is his sinister novel, The Shape of Things to Come, though his Experiment in Autobiography, The Open Conspiracy, and The New World Order have a lot to offer for the discerning reader as well. We will begin this effort by summarizing a few of the major themes to be found in The Shape of Things to Come:

    Note: Please turn now to the review of The Shape of Things to Come in the Recommended Reading Up-dates section of this newsletter so that the major
    theme of the book, the protracted war from 1940-1966 that allows Wells “Air Dictatorship” to come to power over a prostrate world, does not have
    to be restated here. Please take note of the Wellsian attitude toward “environmentalism” also.

    1. Crime, Gangs, and Civil Disorder. Wells predicted an intractable increase in crime, gang warfare, and civil disorder until his “modern world state” became a reality. Wells came as close in this area as anywhere else in “giving away his propaganda game”. On page 143 Wells states, “And then, as the greater community of the World State began to struggle clumsily and painfully out of traditional forms, we see police control again out paced by its task. It gives way. ‘Why,’ the student asks, ‘was this police organization unable to keep pace with the new stresses’.” The obvious answer would be that the Brave New World Order agenda, or movement for social change, is essentially destructive and to blame it for the accelerating degeneration of society. But no! Wells spends pages blaming the limitations of individualism, capitalism, religion, and nationalism for the breakdown and postulating world government as the “only hope” for order. It is clear that this philosophy of blaming traditional forces, that in spite of their imperfections, have been compatible with order for centuries for the increasing disorder instead of the new philosophy remains the successful propaganda line of the New World (dis)Order.

    2. War and International Disorder. Wells actually had some knowledge of the possibility of nuclear power, but made no mention of it in this book and apparently did not foresee the nuclear stalemate of 1946-1989 which gave the world some respite from the exhaustion of perpetual war which he postulated. However, with the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the examples of Yugoslavia, Somalia, South Africa, India-Pakistan, etc. in front of us, it is possible that his projected “30 year war” may run from 1990 to 2016 instead of from 1940 to 1966.

    Wells has a long section on Henry Ford’s “Peace Ship”, a public relations device by which the great industrialist tried to bring WWI to early conclusion. While giving no publicity to Ford’s central contention that Wells’ mentors, the “Great Pirates” or “International Bankers” were promoting WWI as part of their destructive program for “war profits” and a New World Order, Wells shows how Ford’s efforts were doomed to failure not because they would be ridiculed unmercifully by the power of his mentors over the press, but because the evil forces of individualism and capitalism would force the great industrialist into war production for a profit. In fact, if Ford had not been run off the stage by the Anglophile Eastern Establishment press, he might have achieved something!

    3. The Money Question. Wells takes a firm position against the usury and tight money policies of “high finance” and for the easy money policies of “Social Credit” as promoted in Britain and the Commonwealth by C. H. Douglas, crack-pot conspiracy theory advocate (one of us!) who Wells actually goes so far as to mention by name! Of course, Wells fails to mention that his mentors, the most powerful usurers of all time who hold the world’s credit in their hands and manipulated the great crash of 1929 which triggered the Great Depression, create boom and bust cycles to maintain their dominant world position.

    4. Education/Social Nucleation. One of the great mysteries of Wells’ book is his apparently imaginary author, Gustave De Windt who wrote Social Nucleation, supposedly in 1942, a book that solved the final theoretical problems in creating the Modern World State. Wells states that the book, “was the first exhaustive study of the psychological laws underlying team play and esprit de corps . . .” Wells pictures De Windt’s ideas having the impact of a Marx, Plato, Darwin, or Adam Smith, sweeping away the social rubbish of the past including family, religion, ethnicity, tribe, and patriotism and smoothly replacing it with New World Order socialization patterns. There can be little doubt that De Windtian ideas inform Deweyite Progressive Education and, more recently, Outcome Based Education. On a deeper level, De Windt has created a technology of “macrobe” or “social organism” building for the “Air Dictatorship. One can only wonder if Wells had a specific psychologist in mind, perhaps the German Wundt who prefigured behaviorism?

    5. The Martyrdom of Man by Winwood Reade. As we have mentioned before, ultra social Darwinist Winwood Reade was Cecil Rhodes’ “Ayn Rand and Jules Verne” rolled-up into one. On page 108 Wells pays sly tribute to this mentor by mentioning Winwood Reade, though he claims in his autobiography never to have met Rhodes personally. On this page Wells also attempts a lame justification of his mentor’s advocacy of worldwide carnage, disorder, and suffering on the basis of an abundance of happiness in the future Modern World State.

    6. Non-Lethal Weapons. Non-lethal “peace gas” was portrayed as the supreme weapon of the “Airmen”. In fact, the miraculous gas was used to put an end to the influence of the Pope! Though the conspiracy has, of yet, done little of proven value in this area (ask David Koresh), it is interesting to note that Newsweek of February 7, 1994 ran an article titled Soon ‘Phasers on Stun’: A new generation of nonlethal weapons may help rout mobs, subdue gunmen, even win wars–without killing the innocent. The possible application to UN “Peace-Keeping” did not go unnoticed.

    One must ask, “What will be the ultimate results of the Wellsian program for the High Cabal and for the World?”

    First, I continue to be amazed with the continuing success of the conspiracy in blaming society’s increasing problems and crises on the Wellsian scapegoats: private property rights and sovereign nationhood. As the conspiracy continues its systematic destruction of existing social structures, allegedly to create Wells’ formless “social magma” it sees as a precondition for its future, no where in sight, totally unproven, and probably imaginary program of “social re- nucleation”, it is, of course, the cause of the current disorder, not the remedy for it.

    Though many conservatives, libertarians, and other mostly non-socialist ideologists see this clearly, society as a whole still sees the conspiracy’s “movement for social change” as a case by case attempt to cure, not as the problem itself! Thus, we can safely predict that severe social disorder will continue and probably intensify world-wide for the foreseeable future with the mythical Brave New World reconstruction no where in sight. Some like to predict total breakdown and chaos as the ultimate result of this process, however, all the parasitic conspiracy needs to do to arrest a too drastic breakdown of its “host” is to periodically back off on the pressure! Order automatically reasserts itself through the agencies of private capitalism and even national politics, imperfect as as it is. Thus, like Orwell, we can see the High Cabal’s boot stamping forever on the face of humanity, stubbornly preventing possible evolution toward peace, justice, and progress as required to maintain its unchallenged, parasitic position of “Great Pirate”. We won’t hold our breath for the arrival of Wells utopia, The Modern World State.


    Recommended Reading Up-Dates

    Subscribers to the Project are given “first notice” when books are added to the Recommended Reading List (Regular Catalog). They are also given “first notice” when “capsule reviews” are up-dated or prices change. This enables subscribers to order in confidence that the books they desire have a high probability of being in stock for immediate shipment. Once up-dated catalogs begin to be distributed to the general mailing list, a few books begin be on “back order” which can delay delivery 10-45 days. Please remember the $3.95 shipping and handling fee (per order not per book) when ordering if you do not have an ordering form handy.

    The Garden of Aton: Volume I by Nora Boyles, 1993 In Print Paperback, 237 pages, Order #00935 $10.00

    Wide-ranging research and speculation regarding the origin of the various civilizations, ethnic stocks, ruling classes, elites, and religions from the outrageous publisher of the Phoenix Liberator and Contact.

    By Their Fruits You Shall Know Them by Revilo P. Oliver, 1985 In Print Paperback, 33 pages, Order #00900 $5.00

    Covers “Dead Sea Scrolls”….Christianity: Jewish Plot Against Rome? from a right-wing Aryan racist position.

    Freemasonry: The Invisible Cult in Our Midst by Jack Harris, 1983 In Print Paperback, 153 pages, Order #00927 $5.00

    Ex-Master Mason and Worshipful Master in the Blue Lodge exposes the cult from his newly adopted fundamentalist Christian perspective. Reveals “the supreme Masonic word” known only to Master Masons as well as Satanic symbolism of the rituals. Also exposes the so called Christian branch of Masonry, the York Rite.

    Encyclopedia of Freemasonry: Profusely Illustrated in 2-Volummes by Dr. Albert Mackey, 33 degree, 1921 Rare/Out-of-Print Hardcover, 915 pages,
    Order #00931 $75.00

    Classic reference on Masonry by a strong proponent…many fascinating hints include many regarding Albert Pike, Francis Bacon, Adam Weishaupt, and the Illuminati! Only beautiful hardcover collector’s editions are available through rare search.

    Morals and Dogma: of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry by Albert Pike, 1871 Rare/Out-of-Print Hardcover, 861 pages,
    Order #00932 $75.00

    Contains the amazing admission by the Grand Master author that Masonry is the religion of Lucifer!

    Masonry: Beyond the Light by William Schnoebelen, 1991 In Print Paperback, 286 pages, Order #00928 $8.95

    Ex-witch exposes the Masonic cult. This book is endorsed by the anti-Catholic organization of Jack Chick. Worth reading since most anti-Masonic books are overtly or covertly pro-Catholic.

    America’s Secret Aristocracy by Stephen Birmingham, 1987 Rare/Out-of-Print Hardcover, 334 pages, Order #00452 $28.00

    Birmingham chronicles the little-known, low profile “old wealth” (Anglophile) elite whose influence far outstrips their still substantial fortunes which are now dwarfed by the fortunes of the “new rich”. Is their treasonous connection to the Crown and the “Empire of the City” the real source of their influence?

    Blood, Class, and Nostalgia: Anglo-American Ironies by Christopher Hitchens, 1990 In Print Hardcover, 398 pages, Order #00916 $22.95

    Traces the “Special Relationship” over the last 100 years, and shows how the British connection has turned the scales in the assumption of huge overseas commitments, the development of a global intelligence network, and the rise of a nuclear establishment. Includes excellent, independent exposŠ of the Cecil Rhodes financed, Anglophile roots of the American Establishment organized around the Ivy League colleges and the Council on Foreign Relations. Christopher Hitchens is a regular columnist for the left-wing Nation, but his revelations are remarkably consistent with the Anglophobic conspiracy theories of much of the right-wing!

    Cecil Rhodes by Sarah Millin, 1933 Rare/Out-of-Print Hardcover, 406 pages, Order #00936 $35.00

    Reveals that “world rule” for the British Crown was the explicit goal of this seminal personage…the ultimate founder of the Council on Foreign Relations.

    The Martyrdom of Man by William Winwood Reade, 1872 Rare/Out-of-Print Hardcover, Order #00929 $185.0

    See review of The Founder: Cecil Rhodes and the Pursuit of Power.

    The Founder: Cecil Rhodes and the Pursuit of Power by Robert I. Rotberg w/Miles F. Shore, 1988 Rare/Out-of-Print Hardcover, 800 pages, Order
    #00930 $55.00

    As could have been expected from a book written in close, active co-operation with the Rhodes Trust and N. M. Rothschild’s private archives, this massive tome subtly discounts the reality of the “Secret Society” mentioned in Rhodes Wills as a juvenile fantasy whose only result was the Rhodes Scholarships, but remains an important source book needing “mining” by conspiracy theorists. The book also makes a lame attempt to discount the effect of Ruskin’s philosophy on Rhodes and totally ignores the Round Table Group lead by Milner after Rhodes death. It does admit that Milner was the Trustee in Rhodes’ final will which dedicated the bulk of the Rhodes wealth to the furtherance of the Empire.

    Rotberg mentions Rhodes obsession with the Darwinist William Winwood Reade who wrote the prophetic Martyrdom of Man in 1872, calling him Rhodes’ “Ayn Rand and Jules Verne” combined! Reade is said to have predicted much of modern science including atomic power and synthetics and advocated an active acceptance of brutal social Darwinist processes which he saw improving the race for the future through current “martyrdom” of individual humans in both the master and subservient races. H. G. Wells in his infamous Shape of Things to Come also mentions Reade’s book implying that it is fundamental to his own philosophy!

    The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution by H. G. Wells, 1928 Rare/Out-of-Print Xerox, 0200 pages, Order #00407 $12.00

    Wells reveals British Oligarchy’s plans for World Government (Covert Empire).

    The Shape of Things to Come: The Ultimate Revolution by H. G. Wells, 1933 Reprint, 431 pages, Order #00937 $39.00

    The Shape of Things to Come: The Ultimate Revolution by H. G. Wells, In Print VHS Video, 113 pages, Order #00802 $27.95

    H. G. Wells sets forth his theory for building a “Brave New World” Order on the ruins of all traditional cultures. Does the following concluding passage reveal the ultimate destructive strategy that is necessary and being implemented to “clear the ground” for a New World Order? Does this policy explain everything from slaughter in Bosnia to crime in our cities to chaos among our youth?

    “…then it is a theory of world revolution. Plainly the thesis is that history must now continue to be a string of accidents with an increasingly disastrous trend until a comprehensive faith in the modernized World State, socialistic, cosmopolitan and creative, takes hold of the human imagination. When the existing governments and ruling theories of life, the decaying religious and the decaying political forms of to-day, have sufficiently lost prestige through failure and catastrophe, then and then only will world-wide reconstruction be possible. And it must needs be the work, first of all, of an aggressive order of religiously devoted men and women who will try out and establish and impose a new pattern of living upon our race.”The book is somewhat mysteriously dedicated to JosŠ Ortega Y Gasset, “Explorador”.

    This book is best seen as an operational Anglophile conspiratorial scenario transmitted from the British “High Cabal” to their protege, H. G. Wells. In a “curiously” prescient prefiguring of World War II, technology and progress is destroyed throughout the world due to an orgy of war from 1940-1967 (provoked, sustained, and manipulated by Albion?)! With the world prostrate, a tiny elite with high technology air ships (The Airmen wearing eerie black uniforms) establishes a New World Order “Air Dictatorship” using “Peace Gas” to subdue “evil warlords”!! Though interrupted by the apparently unanticipated invention of the atomic bomb, startlingly, this fantastic scenario again looks more and more plausible after the collapse of the Soviet Union (predicted in the book) and the current, intensifying ethnic/tribal/religious warfare world-wide–Eastern Europe, the Balkans, the Middle East, Africa, and Central Asia–while only the Anglo-American power remains as a high tech super-power capable of intervening at will.

    The Video is a greatly truncated version of the book with the addition of an interesting sub-plot regarding an attempt to travel to the Moon, an episode which curiously prefigured the American Space Program! Wells appears to take the side of technological progress and adventure against more “stand pat” forces within the High Cabal. This brings up the interesting point that environmentalist extremism plays no part within the Wells’ book. Though he is totally dismissive and opposed to any technological progress that emanates from private capitalism or national efforts, which according to Wells can only lead to catastrophe, he paints of picture of marvelous technological advances a la once his New World Order is fully in control world-wide. This may give us a clue as to the real motives behind the current environmental crusade of the High Cabal.

    Video Rental: $6.00 for 2 days…customer pays return postage.

    The Tribes: The Israelite Origins of Western Peoples by Yair Davidy, Rare/Out-of-Print Paperback, 480 pages, Order #00917 $35.00

    Detailed Israel-Identity theory that Northern Europeans constitute the 10 Lost Tribes and that Northern Europeans plus the Jews constitute “Biblical Israel” and are destined to lead the world! Pro-Jewish, pro-Zionist analysis! Is this the British Israel-Identity theory really operative in the Anglophile conspiracy? Is the Aryan identity movement, not just British Israel, a covert Jewish conspiracy?

    Who Are the Germans?: Their Ancient Roots and Future Might by Craig White, 1993 In Print Paperback, Order #00938 $15.00

    Expanded version of The Assyrians in the Modern World. Bible Identity of the Germans.

    The World of David Rockefeller: An Interview of Rockefeller by Bill Moyers 1980 Transcript reprint Pamphlet, 0032 pages, Order #00591 $12.00

    Television interview of Rockefeller during a “typical day’s work”. Extremely revealing. David Rockefeller seemed to be anxious to enhance his reputation as the world’s most powerful conspirator, perhaps because his power was beginning to slip relative to other factions? Brags about key role of Chase Manhattan loans in key world events, particularly Italy where Red Brigades terrorism was underway. Do conspiracy theories enhance the reputations of the International Bankers?

    Clinton’s Conspiracy by Ralph Epperson, 1993 In Print , Order #00934 $5.00

    The Carroll Quigley-Bill Clinton connection at Georgetown University.

    Foundations: Their Power and Influence by RenŠ A. Wormser, 1958 In Print Hardcover, 412 pages, Order #00939 $19.95

    Perhaps the most important book ever written on the subject. Reveals the plan of the powers that be to overturn the Constitution in favor of one-world collectivism.

    AIDS: The Unnecessary Epidemic by Dr. Stanley Monteith, In Print , Order #00933 $14.95

    How the Gay Lobby prevented the medical establishment from containing the AIDS epidemic.

    The Murdered Magicians: The Templars and their Myth by Peter Partner, Ph.D., 1987 In Print Hardcover, 0209 pages, Order #00100 $17.95

    Academic scholar examines the history of the Templars and the “Secret Society Magical Myth” that has grown-up around them since their suppression in 1307. Valuable source book for those seeking to confirm or debunk the Templar theory of the founding of the conspiracy.

    Critical Path by R. Buckminster Fuller & Adjuvant Kiyoshi Kuromiya, 1981 In Print Paperback, 471 pages, Order #00941 $14.95

    The creator of the Geodesic Dome and coiner of the term “Spaceship Earth” in setting forth his vision for the future of mankind adumbrates his insightful theory of the covert world-rule of the “Great Pirates” (ie. the British Empire). Many suspect that Fuller was the unacknowledged source of Lyndon LaRouche’s theories, including much of his opposition to the no-growth ecology extremism of the “Great Pirate’s” “Court Intellectuals”! Fuller does not condemn “environmentalism” with the same extremism as LaRouche, but does argue against no-progress extremism.

    Page 58-59: “It seems strange that we were not taught about the historical, philosophical, and economic significance of the foregoing transition to a closed-sphere world system (from infinite plane world view). Because the churches were strong and the “Great Pirates” wished to obscure both their monopoly of the riches of the now limited system and their grand world ocean strategy for its control, the significance of the concept of a closed world system was popularly unrealized. The power structure and its patronized educational systems `let well enough alone’.” (!!)

    The Greatest Story Never Told: Winston Churchill and the Crash of 1929 by Pat Riott w/message from Philip Dru III, In Print Paperback, Order #00947

    Baruch-Churchill conspiracy to trigger and profit from the Crash of 1929.

    Autobiography of Bertrand Russell (Volume 2): 1914-1944 by Bertrand Russell, 1968 Rare/Out-of-Print Hardcover, 418 pages, Order #00945 $24.00

    Autobiography of Bertrand Russell (Volume I): 1872-1914 by Bertrand Russell, 1967 Rare/Out-of-Print Hardcover, 356 pages, Order #00944

    Important confirmation of the goings-on in the Co-efficient Club, where the Fabian Society and the British Imperialists met as one and the outcome
    was the New World Order “Open Conspiracy” as described by H. G. Wells.

    Experiment in Autobiography by H. G. Wells, 1934 Rare/Out-of-Print Hardcover, 718 pages, Order #00942 $55.00

    Reveals the close connection of Wells to not only the Fabian Society as is well known, but also his close personal access to key British Oligarchs such as Lord Bertrand Russell, Lord Alfred Milner, and Lord Robert Cecil through his membership in the pro-Imperialist Coefficient Club. Wells also reveals that the Coefficient Club was organized by Sydney and Beatrice Webb, the leading lights of the Fabian Society, thus inadvertently exposing the Fabian Society as a front for British Oligarchical world rule. The works of H. G. Wells are perhaps the most candid exposŠ of the New World Order conspiracy from the approving perspective of a participant.

    Final Judgement: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy by Michael Collins Piper, 1994 In Print , Order #00949 $20.00

    The Israeli-Mossad connection to the Kennedy assassination!

    Call It Conspiracy by Larry Abraham, In Print Paperback, 344 pages, Order #00948 $12.95

    More from the co-author of None Dare Call It Conspiracy.

    World Revolution by Nesta Webster, 1921 Rare/Out-of-Print Paperback, 0327 pages, Order #00714 $30.00

    Cover pocket of the book contains a famous chart linking the forces of “World Revolution” back to Illuminism.

    Syncretism: Imminent and Deadly Threat to Our Roman Catholic Faith by John Cotter, 1993 In Print Paperback, 57 pages, Order #00923 $7.50

    Christian Universalism giving way amalgamation of world religions (a la Masonry) in the Catholic Church?

    The Franklin Cover-up: Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska by John W. decamp, 1992 In Print Paperback, 288 pages, Order #00943 $12.00

    A massive child kidnapping and sex abuse scandal in Nebraska was quashed when the investigative trail lead to the rich, the powerful and the CIA! The State Senator author was warned by “ex”-CIA chief William E. Colby to stop pursuing the case because the forces involved were “too powerful.”
    DeCamp knew Colby personally from his participation as an Army Captain in Colby’s CORDS program in Vietnam! The book implies that the CIA has been operating child sex abuse rings as part of its world-wide program to compromise and blackmail the rich and powerful in and out of government!

    The Rich and the Super-Rich: A Study in the Power of Money Today by Ferdinand Lundberg, 1968 Rare/Out-of-Print Hardcover, 0812 pages, Order
    #00401 $14.95

    Up-date of authors America’s 60 Families. Did much to eliminate the post-WWII complacency about the super-rich on both the Left and Right.

    A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order In Print Hardcover, Order #00946 $21.95

    Proves oil to be the central factor of world geopolitics.


    Published by A-albionic Research, P. O. Box 20273, Ferndale, Michigan 48220. Copyrighted articles so indicated. All other articles may be
    re-printed without charge if the name and address of A-albionic Research is included as the source of the article or excerpt. Display, classified,
    and insert advertising rates upon request. Subscriptions are $30.00 per a year. Write for list of free, bonus books available with subscriptions.

    James Daugherty, volunteer Postmaster for A-albionic Research, a ruling class/conspiracy research resource for the entire political-ideological
    spectrum. Quarterly journal, book sales, rare/out-of-print searches, and custom research since 1984.

    For FREE Info Pack and Back Issue Catalogs fax 1-313-885-1181,
    e-mail jhdaugh@mail.msen.com, or snail mail
    A-A Research, PO Box 20273, Ferndale, MI 48220-0273. For maximum info provide snail as well as e-mail address.

    “Our annotated catalogs are an education in themselves!”

    “Over 15,000 Books and Documents Cataloged in Our DataBases”

  • Britain’s Plot (Coefficients Club) to Destroy Civilization:

    The New Dark Ages Conspiracy

    [Editor’s Note: I’m typing this on Sunday morning, July 3, 2005, during the Fourth of July weekend where we celebrate our ‘independence’ from the control of the British aristocracy. I spent about an hour flipping through TV channels this morning listening to short segments of propaganda facilitators Chris Wallace at Fox and George Stephanopoulos at ABC, interviewing their carefully chosen guests who continue to parley the fiction that all is well in the Land of the Free and it’s just a matter of (continually) debating the ‘liberal’ and ‘conservative’ positions in order to steer the ship of state on the best course-while the underpinnings of our liberty are being kicked out from under us daily by the Illuminated, British controlled traitors (and their minions) in both houses of congress, the executive and more recently (in the news), the judiciary branches of government.

    Another sort of fiction is taking place among the phalanx of pseudo-religious fundamentalist preachers seen on TV every Sunday morning dishing out the most outrageous amalgamation of Biblical quotes, prophecies, interpretations, fabrications (“God spoke to me and said …”) and some portion, always, of the best laid, best funded, best organized, best planned Hoax in the history of humanity, the ‘kingdom of God on earth’ deception. Everyone is familiar with the story (and I do mean story) being pounded into the heads of millions of gullible fundamental Christians around the world that Jesus Himself will soon rule from Jerusalem for a 1,000 years, after the Great Tribulation, the Battle of Armageddon, the reign of the Anti-Christ, etc. are over. All these terrible things must happen, don’t you know, because they are the fulfullment of God’s Plan and prophesized scripture. And we know it’s true because it’s “in the Bible” and the Bible is “infallible”, we are told by Pastor Ken Copeland, as the Bible is the written “Word of God” (at least the King James version is; the version edited by British aristocrat Francis Bacon in the name of pedophile/degernerate King James of England. The 600 or so other versions of the Bible may be in some doubt as to their infallibility)

    This article will focus on the members of the elite British group knows as the ‘Coefficients’ who eventually became the British Round Table. Other articles to be posted at this web site, will help explain how British oligarchs, working in cahoots with the Rothschilds, planned the creation of the state of Israel at the end of the 19th century in order to bring about the chaos we see today in the Middle East. These same elite families helped arrange the conditions that led to the American Civil War and were behind the assasination of Abraham Lincoln, as John Wilkes Booth lived out his days in comfort in England following his escape from America (no, Booth did not die in a Virginia barn fire). The same British elites, again working with the Rothschilds, set up World War I by arranging for the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir apparent of Austria, to occur in Serbia. Naturally, Austria declared war on Serbia. Russia was allied with France and Great Britain at the time and Germany with Austria & Prussia. Franz’s uncle, German Emperor Wilhelm II, threatened hostilities if Russia did not stand down its orders to mobilbize the Russian Army and Navy. They didn’t, so Germany declared war on Russia and France. When German troops crossed the neutral Belgian border on August 4, 1914, Great Britain declared war on Germany-all dominos falling in place, as planned.

    The British oligarchs pulled America into the war through their agent in America, “colonel” Earl Mandel House, who had President Woodrow Wilson wrapped around his finger like a modern day Svengali, by arranging for the sinking of a British owned ship, the Lusitania, by a German submarine torpedo-which ignited tons of British armaments secretly stored in the hole of the ship-a violation of the supposed neutrality of passenger liner ships. Not long afterwards, another American agent (of the Rothschilds), German-born Jacob H. Schiff, senior partner in the New York banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb, & Co., arranged for Leiber Davidovich Bronstein, also known as Leon Trotsky, to secretly board a ship one night from Bronx, NY bound for a port in Russia along with his merry band of revolutionary friends and a cargo hole laden heavy with gold bars. The Rothschilds also arranged for Vladimir Illivich Ulyanov, better known as Lenin, to travel, along with his contingent of 30 cohorts, by train from Switzerland to Germany, to Scandinavia, and into Russia for the same mission that Trotsky was assigned- to wrest control of the Russian revolution away from its legitimate heirs into the hands of the ‘Bolshevik Revolution’ , or more accurately, Rothschild/British Oligarch proxies. The Russian revolution prevented the Czar’s aggressive Russian military forces from steamrolling straight into Berlin which might have ended World War I much sooner than planned and would have short circuited the much ballyhooed ‘need’ for the League of Nations. The British oligarchs also needed the excuse of World War I as a pretext for declaring war against Turkey, since Turkey and the Ottoman empire were the lawful rulers of Palestine.

    The British oligarchs, the illegitimate ‘creation’ of the state of Israel-stolen from the majority arab Palestinian population by British annexation (The Balfour Declaration of 1917) at the request of the Rothchilds, the 1881 Russian-based Zionist movement, and the Christian fundamentalist ‘kingdom of God on earth’ hoax are all connected. The end result will be a one world, feudal slave society run by British oligarchs. The plan is to reduce the wrold’s population by roughly 85-90%. Christianity will no longer exist and the only sanctioned ‘religion’ will be the worship of Lucifer, the “lord” of British Masons and oligarchs. The scheme is to use American Christians to destroy Christianity and a belief in America’s Constitution and soverignty by substituting the Phariseean myth of the ‘kingdom of God on earth’ scenario. For those Christians still capable of independent thought, it’s important to recall that Christ said that “My Kingdom is not of this world”. Christ specifically criticized the Pharisees for falsely claiming that there would be an earthly ‘kingdom of God’ and chided all those who wanted to proclaim Him as The Messiah.

    Final note: The national anthem of America, The Star Spangled Banner, was originally a British tune. Francis Scott Key substituted American lyrics for the same tune. I had wondered why, when a proposal was suggested (in the 1980’s I think) to change the national anthem to Irving Berlin’s far more beautiful tune, God Bless America, it was never seriously considered or debated. Now I know why. …Ken]

    by Carol White
    Printed in The American Almanac, June 20, 1994.


    Original Title:
    H. G. Wells, Bertrand Russell, Mackinder, Rhodes —
    Britain’s Plot to Destroy Civilization:
    The New Dark Ages Conspiracy

    Chapter 1:
    Bertrand Russell Walks Out


    Carol White’s book was published in October 1980. She is now working on a second edition. What follows are excerpts from Chapter 1, which is titled “Bertrand Russell Walks Out.”

    [The first section of the chapter describes a meeting of the Coefficients Club at St. Ermin’s Hotel in London, in 1903. During this meeting of British policy-makers, the factional lines were drawn concerning how Britain was to meet the growing economic challenge from America and the European continent: the “realist” position, espousing full-scale British participation in a European war, and the “nominalist” stance of Bertrand Russell, who sought to avoid British entanglement, while manipulating a conflict that would bleed the continental powers.]


    H.G. Wells in his autobiography characterized the conflict in the Coefficients Club fairly accurately, albeit through the prism of his own point of view.

    “The undeniable contraction of the British outlook in the opening decade of the new century is one that has exercised my mind very greatly…. Gradually, the belief in the possible world leadership of England had been deflated, by the economic development of America and the militant boldness of Germany. The long reign of Queen Victoria, so prosperous, progressive, and effortless, had produced habits of political indolence and cheap assurance. As a people we had got out of training, and when the challenge of these new rivals became open, it took our breath away at once. We did not know how to meet it….

    “We had educated our general population reluctantly; our universities had not kept pace with the needs of the new time; our ruling class, protected in its advantages by a universal snobbery, was broad-minded, easy-going, and profoundly lazy. The Edwardian monarchy, court, and society were amiable and slack. `Efficiency’–the word of Earl Rosebery and the Webbs–was felt to be rather priggish and vulgar. Our liberalism was no longer a larger enterprise, it had become a generous indolence. But minds were waking up to this. Over our table at St. Ermin’s Hotel wrangled Maxse, Bellairs, Hewins, Amery, and Mackinder, all stung by the small but humiliating tale of disasters in the South Africa war, all sensitive to the threat of business recession, and all profoundly alarmed by the naval and military aggressiveness of Germany, arguing chiefly against the liberalism of Reeves and Russell and myself, and pulling us down, whether we liked it or not, from large generalities to concrete problems.”

    It would be possible to rearrange the seating at the Coefficients Club dinner table to form a graduated spectrum. At one end of the rainbow would be Russell, glaring down at Maxse and Amery seated at the other end. In the center, Lord Robert Cecil, with Haldane, Grey, Milner, and Mackinder seated next to him toward Amery’s direction, with Wells and Beatrice and Sydney Webb on the other side. Despite their differences, all were agreed on the necessity for British (by which they all understood the British oligarchy) world supremacy.

    To do this, the United States must be captured as Britain’s dumb giant, to fight its wars, pay its bills, and strongarm Britain’s anti-American System policies on the rest of the world….

    Second, Germany, France, and Russia must be played off against each other in conflicts that were expected to erupt into war. This balance-of-power stratagem had been British foreign policy since the time the Cecils assumed control, with the backing of the Italian Jesuit Pallavicini family in the time of Tudor England.

    It was here that the differences of the Russell faction, correctly deprecated as kooks by the just as evil realist Milner-Mackinder-Amery faction, emerged. Russell believed that Britain could avoid being drawn into World War I, and accomplish its aims through psychological warfare run through the intelligence services.

    This is not to say that Lord Robert Cecil and the realists rejected the use of psychological warfare. It was William Cecil, who as Queen Elizabeth I’s Secretary of State, had established the British Secret Intelligence Service….

    Now, the Cecils counted on the Russian Revolution, which they were engaged in plotting, in their plans. But they were correctly convinced that Britain could not achieve its aims without being able to back up its claims with a credible military intervention, for two related reasons. In a war between Germany and Russia, Germany was the assured winner; France brought in against Germany would balance the odds, but without Britain supporting France, both France and Germany would withdraw quickly from a no-win situation. Furthermore, without Britain in the fight, the United States could not be brought into an essentially European conflict. As it happened, H.G. Wells admitted in his autobiography, Lord Grey started the First World War by allowing the German government to believe that the British would not enter the war even if the Germans did. But as Lord Louis Mountbatten’s biographer confirms, Mountbatten’s father, in his capacity as second Lord of the Admiralty, had put the British fleet in battle readiness the week before war broke out. “My father,” said Mountbatten, “was able to tell the king, `We have the drawn sword in our hand.’|” Robert Cecil expected the aura of power, represented by the British Navy, to carry the day.

    Mackinder and Milner, on the other hand, with their recent direct experience of the Boer War, demanded competent military-industrial backup for war, which meant an economic policy of government support to key industries and raw materials sectors at home and in the colonies. Thus, Russell and the Cecils lined up for a “free-trade” policy against the relatively dirigist outlook of the realists who supported “protectionism.” As the war approached, Wells shifted his support to the Milner side, while, however, remaining as a central figure in SIS intelligence operations both behind-the-scenes and as a “socialist” propagandist.

    The club named the “Coefficients”–perhaps as a joke on the efficient Webbs, considering the obvious diversity of opinion represented–met at monthly dinners from 1902 through 1908. Most of the people who variously attended the dinners (at which only between ten and fourteen people would be present at one time) later formed the British Round Table, more informally known as the Cliveden Set.

    These were the circles who argued out the policies for World War I and World War II and today are planning out World War III. Never do they disagree on fundamental goals; nevertheless, the split between the realist and kook-nominalist factions has remained….

    The Cecils

    To give Mackinder more of his due in the debate, he was not only arguing the necessity for British intervention in the First World War. He was also speaking directly to military utopians such as Lord Robert Cecil, men who refused to accept the lessons of the Boer War and believed that they would be bailed out by the navy, or in a later period, by tanks and airplanes, or today by tactical nuclear weapons, without an adequate land force or industrial home base to sustain it.

    Incredibly, Lord Cecil, in charge of the military blockade of Germany during World War I, believed the war would be over in a few months. At the beginning of the four-year-long campaign of attrition that was the First World War, Cecil dined in France with the Commander-in-Chief of the British Expeditionary Force, who noted their conversation.

    “He went on to emphasize that the Germans had been completely beaten in the West and that they knew it. He was also very sanguine about Poland and evidently thought that the Germans would very soon begin to ask for terms of peace which both he and his staff were extremely anxious should be extremely moderate.”

    During the war, the first tanks were secretly tested at Cecil’s estate, over the opposition of the war director Lord Kitchener, whose experience had been gained in India and the Sudan. Haldane had become head of the War Office and had been partially successful in reforming and modernizing the army over the protests of colonial officers like Kitchener, but was fired from the cabinet at the beginning of the war, ostensibly out of suspicions that he was not totally lined up with the war faction. Haldane’s reorganization of the army in 1905 had stepped on the toes of the military. The combination of an officer corps whose mettle was tested in mock heroic battles against the African Zulus and the Egyptian dervishes–let’s not mention the Boer War, darling, that was just an unpleasant episode–and overburdened with deadweight aristocratic younger sons foreordained that, once fully embroiled in the war, the British desperately needed the Americans to intervene on their behalf.

    The state of the officer corps is illustrated by the career of Robert Cecil’s younger brother, Edward. He failed the entrance to the Royal Military College, and every other examination that faced him thereafter, but a military career was by no means closed to him. There was another way to become part of the officer corps. A candidate could be appointed to the militia or local volunteer force, the only qualification being the appropriate social connections. After four years of service, the candidate could then transfer to the regular army and stand on the same footing as a Sandhurst graduate.

    Fighting under Kitchener’s command in Egypt, Edward Cecil wrote his brother this description of his first battle in 1896:

    “We fought the Dervishes the other day…. I was not in half such a funk as I expected. I was much more afraid of being afraid. It was very exciting and not a bit brutalizing, as one does not at all realize the enemy are men. We, however, were very little exposed or rather fired at, so perhaps I better not talk.”

    The Cecil family, dating back to the infamous William Cecil, Lord Burleigh, and his nephew, the dishonest pederast Francis Bacon, Lord Verulam, was at the evil center of power in Great Britain. Robert Cecil’s father, Lord Salisbury, was prime minister in three Tory governments, stretching from 1885 to 1902, to be succeeded by cousin Arthur Balfour. Lord Robert’s brother Hugh was also a member of Parliament, as was brother James, before succeeding to the title and joining the House of Lords. The Salisbury government was in power during the Boer War, with Lord Salisbury acting as his own foreign minister.

    The flavor of the family is captured by a few incidents worth relating, not only because of the family’s central role in the politics of England, but because the Cecils epitomize the oligarchical outlook.

    Lord Robert’s younger brother Hugh was not in the Coefficients Club, but he was a dedicated kook. An even more extreme utopian than Robert, he was involved in the creation of the air force, that branch of the service most susceptible to utopian wunderwaffen schemes.

    Hugh had opposed military conscription before the First World War, and to justify his position wrote a memorandum in which he declared that preparation for war was largely a waste of time, as the unknown factor of generalship practically decided the issue; that in any case, defeat was less serious than it seemed, for it never really destroyed a nation; that Great Britain had always flourished in spite of inadequate military preparations; and that national service would have a prejudicial effect on the character of the British people.

    When reminded of this position eighteen months into the war, as the casualties were mounting, he countered coolly: “There is nothing fine in killing, but there is something fine in being killed, and conscription takes that away.”

    When his opponent shouted, “Epicure! Do you want boys of eighteen slaughtered to satisfy your aesthetic greed?” Hugh shrugged….

    Robert Cecil found the company of men like Wells and Mackinder intolerable on the basis of class prejudice. Although forced to hide it, in order to turn the Coefficients and the later Round Table group into effective instruments, he could yet confide to his wife in an 1893 letter:

    “I’m down here with a thoroughly middle class man–not a bad fellow and decidedly intelligent…. I don’t think I shall stay with the middle classes any more. I don’t deny their intelligence, nor even in the case of my Norwich host, culture, but they are squalid somehow, and I’m never at my ease with them. And then they have such uncomfortable furniture.”

    He was a bitter anticapitalist, later gravitating to the Labour Party and the peace movement, where at a higher level, he coordinated the same networks orbiting around Bertrand Russell. He wrote in another letter about a peer at whose house he was a guest: “An ass, but a gentleman, a Tory of the old school, full of a sense of duty. They’re all right, unlike these miserable Middle Class employers….”

    Leo Amery was an important member of the later Round Table group, as well as a Coefficient. Wells classed Amery with Winston Churchill. While a Cecil would not have bridged the class gap in that way, their own view of Churchill was similar. Wells begins a discussion of Amery and Churchill in his Autobiography by referencing his own childhood.

    “In those days I had ideas about Aryans extraordinarily like Mr. Hitler’s. The more I hear of him the more I am convinced that his mind is almost the twin of my thirteen-year-old mind in 1879; but heard through a megaphone–and–implemented. I do not know from what books I caught my first glimpse of the Great Aryan People going to and fro in the middle plains of Europe, spreading east, west, north, and south … whose ultimate triumphs everywhere squared accounts with the Jews…. I have met men in responsible positions, L.S. Amery, for example, Winston Churchill, George Trevelyan, C.F.G. Masterman, whose imaginations were manifestly built upon a similar framework and who remained puerile in their political outlook because of its persistence.”

    Granted that Robert Cecil and his wife who attacked Churchill, the relative realist, were actively involved in bringing Hitler to power along with the rest of the Cliveden Set, they nevertheless were correct in their assessment of Churchill. “Nothing would suit W.C. better than to be the Mussolini of England,” Lady Cecil wrote bluntly.

    In 1924, Lord Robert was in the cabinet with major responsibility for setting up the League of Nations, but resigned in 1926 while retaining his association with the League (and after World War II becoming head of the United Nations Organization). Presumably his resignation was occasioned by his fear that Britain, by breaking its treaty agreements with the United States at the Naval Disarmament Conference, would force a breach between the two nations and endanger the strategy for World War II. On the need for another world war, Cecil and Churchill were in fundamental agreement. But history repeats itself to those who will never learn….

    Winston Churchill

    Already in 1926, Churchill was preparing for World War II, in which history repeated itself with the same old factional differences asserting themselves. The Hitler project was a collaboration effort that involved the entire spectrum of the oligarchy and its agents. Churchill, Russell, Wells, the Cecils created Hitler. How he was to be contained and directed against the Soviet Union was another matter. Early in the game, Churchill warned that Britain would be compelled to fight World War II; Russell again espoused British neutrality.

    Despite the differences of tone, Churchill, himself of aristocratic lineage, always maintained the closest ties with the Cecil family, politically as well as personally.

    Churchill had his first meeting with Hugh Cecil in 1898. As he later described it, the self-assurance he had acquired in Cuba, on the North-West Frontier of India, and at Omdurman was no protection against the dialectic of Hugh Cecil and his friends. He wrote:

    “They were all interested to see me, having heard of my activities, and also on account of my father’s posthumous prestige. Naturally I was on my mettle, and not without envy in the presence of these young men only two or three years older than myself, all born with silver spoons in their mouths, all highly distinguished at Oxford or Cambridge, and all ensconced in safe Tory constituencies, I felt indeed I was the earthen pot among the brass….

    “The conversation drifted to the issue of whether peoples have a right to self-government or only to good government, what are the inherent rights of human beings and on what are they founded? From this we pushed on to slavery as an institution. I was much surprised to find that my companions had not the slightest hesitation in championing the unpopular side on all these issues; but what surprised me still more, and even vexed me, was the difficulty I had in making plain my righteous and indeed obvious point of view against their fallacious but most ingenious arguments. They knew so much more than I did, that my bold generalities about liberty, equality, and fraternity got seriously knocked about….”

    Nevertheless, Churchill at once enrolled in the small band of Cecil followers, nicknamed the Hughligians. Here he was trained to accept the complete amorality demanded of Britain’s most elite ruling circles. They, like the Coefficients, met over dinner. Robert Cecil’s description of one such dinner is interesting not only for its evaluation of Churchill but for the attitude toward Churchill held by the family well into the 1950s. Churchill, despite his pedigree, position, or periods when he got out of line, was their man. Lord Cecil writes to his wife:

    “We all talked at times so loudly as to remind me of Puys in the old days. And we all argued, Winston more or less contra mundum. With much of what he said I agreed. But he has not properly speaking any opinions…. Winston is a journalist and he adopts a view because it would look well in print. Unless he can correct this it will ultimately be fatal to him in politics. On the other hand, he is very young and may change greatly. He has none of Linkey’s [Hugh Cecil] subtlety of mind or dexterity of expression. But he has considerable force and I think courage. He is both original and receptive. His worst defect mentally is that he is a little shallow–satisfied with a phrase.”

    Later, … the Marquess of Salisbury, James Cecil, headed the Watch Committee, composed mostly of Cecils, that accomplished the shift and placed Churchill in the prime ministership–despite his shortcomings.

    The Anglo-Jesuit Link

    The Cecil family has been connected to networks established by the Society of Jesus since at least the reign of Elizabeth I. While their power base is the British Empire, they, like the openly Catholic Howard and Percy families, can also rely on connections to the Hapsburg and Italian oligarchies to place themselves above the British monarchy. (Gwendolyn Cecil almost married into the Howard family at the turn of the century.)

    Although the family was established under Jesuit patronage, the Cecils maintain loyalty to Protestantism. Yet, since the Jesuit order is itself an oligarchist intelligence implant into the Catholic Church, and not a religious order, this is no test of their continued Jesuit connections, which remain an open question.

    Hugh Cecil expressed the family’s cynicism, despite its strict outward adherence to the Church of England, in the following repartee with cousin Algernon, a convert to Roman Catholicism and thereby a direct link to the British Jesuit circles to which Phillip Kerr, Lord Lothian, of the Round Table belonged.

    “Algernon, why have you grown that absurd beard?”

    “Our Lord grew a beard.”

    “|`Our Lord was not a gentleman.”

    Algernon described the Cecil family philosophy to Beatrice Webb, who recorded it in her diary.

    “Young Cecil was interesting, because he was able to describe or imply the Cecil philosophy of life. For him society was cloven in two–the Church and the world. The Church was governed by spiritual illumination; the world outside of this radius was exclusively dominated by the motive of pecuniary self-interest. To attempt to run the secular world on any other motive was not only contrary to the commandment `Give unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s’ but was almost blasphemy. All real progress was confined to progress of the individual soul under the influence of the Church. Any increase of honesty or kindliness, of honor, public spirit or truth-seeking brought about otherwise, was merely a higher stage of self-interest (equally damnable as the lower stages)–merely the discovery by each individual that those qualities paid better. Accompanying, and to some extent coinciding with this cleavage, was that between the hereditary and landed aristocracy represented by the Cecils, and `the others.’ The Cecils governed by spiritual illumination (inherited through a long line of noble ancestors) and were to direct the policy of the state, making use of the lower motives of vulgar folk to keep the state going on its material side. The off part of the whole scheme was the almost fanatical objection to any attempt to alter the motives of human nature, otherwise than by the action of the Church on the individual soul–and a complete complacency with the one secular motive of enlightened self-interest as the basis of everyday life. It was almost as wicked to tamper with this motive by introducing other considerations into the industrial or political organisation of the state, as it was to introduce the pecuniary motive into the Church–as for instance in the sale of indulgences or simony.”

    Beatrice Webb, the daughter of a successful railroad speculator associated with the Rothschilds, understood the aristocracy in a way that was impossible for poor Wells, the son of a servant in the employ of another servant fortunate enough to marry into the lesser nobility but snubbed accordingly. Where Wells could delude himself that he was socially accepted by his dinner partners at the Coefficients, Beatrice had no such delusions and was mortally offended when she came face to face with her oligarchical controllers. Her diary is full of self-consoling comments such as: “Dined with Hugh Cecil. It is good to be in our middle-class home again.” Yet, like Algernon Cecil, she describes her and her husband’s associates as “the stage army of the good,” in keeping with George Bernard Shaw’s parable about the Fabian Society, Major Barbara, in which they are the Salvation Army.

    Sidney Webb is given credit as the organizer of the Coefficients. It is obvious that despite his pretensions, the group that he assembled–a cross-section of the British elite and its close associates–was only brought together under Robert Cecil’s direction.

    Russell, Haldane, and Grey were hereditary peers. Milner was made a Lord. Haldane, Grey, and Cecil were to be in the Liberal government when it came to power in two years time. Leo Maxse’s sister, Violet, was the wife of Robert Cecil’s brother Edward and, after his death, of Lord Milner. Halford J. Mackinder had just become director of the London School of Economics and his reputation as a geopolitician had spread to Germany where Major-General Karl Haushofer, the ghostwriter of Hitler’s Mein Kampf [along with Rudolf Hess], acknowledged Mackinder as the source of his ideas….< p>

    Sidney and Beatrice Webb

    The Webbs, like Wells, were useful to the Cecils. What they lacked in flair was compensated for in industry, as they laid the groundwork for the collectivist side of fascism. Wells described the Webbs in The New Machiavelli, thinly disguised as Altiora and Oscar Bailey. He wrote:

    “Oscar … had a quite astounding memory for facts and a mastery of detailed analysis, and the time afforded scope for these gifts. The later eighties were full of politico-social discussion…. He won the immense respect of everyone specially interested in social and political questions; he soon achieved the limited distinction that is awarded such capacity, and at that I think he would have remained for the rest of his life if he had not encountered Altiora.

    “But Altiora Macvite was an altogether exceptional woman, an extraordinary mixture of qualities, the one woman in the world who could make something more out of Bailey than that…. She was entirely unfitted for her sex’s sphere…. Yet, you mustn’t imagine she was an inelegant or unbeautiful woman, and she is inconceivable to me in high collars or any sort of masculine garment. But her soul was bone, and at the base of her was a vanity gaunt and greedy!…

    “The two supplemented each other to an extraordinary extent.”

    Russell himself gave much the same account in his Autobiography, writing: “Webb was originally a second division clerk in the civil service, but by immense industry succeeded in rising to the first division. He was somewhat earnest and did not like jokes on sacred subjects such as political theory. On one occasion I remarked to him that democracy has at least one merit, namely, that a Member of Parliament cannot be stupider than his constituents, for the more stupid he is, the more stupid they were to elect him.

    “Worship of the state. This last was of the essence of Fabianism. It led both the Webbs and also Shaw into what I thought an undue tolerance of Mussolini and Hitler….

    “Both of them were fundamentally undemocratic, and regarded it as the function of a statesman to bamboozle or terrorize the populace.”

    Russell, of course, is more delicate about his own fascist predilections. “All think it folly and very unpopular,” wrote Russell from Cambridge right before the First World War. “Tories as well as Liberals; and they hardly realise that we are being drawn in.” Russell continued, according to his biographer Ronald Clarke, by making a case for British neutrality, ending with a plea for German lebensraum: “When they try to protect their homes and their wives and daughters against vast hordes of Russian savages, we do our best to prevent their efforts from being successful, and to threaten them with starvation if war breaks out.”

    In collaboration with Lord James Salisbury, chairman of the Conscientious Objectors’ Board, Russell was at the time beginning to create the pacifist movement, which was and continues to be a handy instrument of British subversion. Pacifism allowed Britain to penetrate Germany during the war and the Soviet Union thereafter. In the period of the Neville Chamberlain appeasement policy, it was psychologically useful as a way of turning Germany east rather than west–“Look, England will never fight again” was the message. But while Russell was suffering public opprobrium for his stand during World War I, he was still a welcome guest at aristocratic country houses at parties attended by Asquith, the British prime minister.

    The Race Imperialists
    What of the other members of the Coefficients Club?

    Lord Milner, appointed to the peerage during his lifetime, became a civil servant upon leaving Oxford University. Before being assigned to South Africa, he served as finance minister in Egypt (an important post subsequently held by Edward Cecil). He was recruited to the ideas of empire, as was imperialist Cecil Rhodes, by the Oxford Lecturer John Ruskin, medievalist and guild socialist. After leaving his post as high commissioner of South Africa in 1905, Milner became the administrator of the Rhodes Trust. He died in the 1920s, after again joining the government during the war.

    Milner’s Credo, written at the end of his life, expresses the belief structure of an imperialist who attached himself to an aristocracy into which he was born. To him the flag was no mere bunting.

    Milner writes that he is a:

    “nationalist, not a cosmopolitan…. I am a British (indeed primarily an English) nationalist. If I am also an Imperialist, it is because the destiny of the English race … has been to strike fresh roots in distant parts…. My patriotism knows no geographical but only racial limits. I am an Imperialist and not a Little Englander, because I am a British Race Patriot…. It is not the soil of England, dear as it is to me, which is essential to arouse my patriotism, but the speech, the tradition, the principles, the aspirations of the British race….

    “The wider patriotism is no mere exalted sentiment. It is a practical necessity…. England, nay more, Great Britain, nay more, the United Kingdom is no longer a power in the world which it once was…. But the British Dominions as a whole are not only self-supporting. They are more nearly self-sufficient than any other political entity … if they can be kept an entity….

    “This brings us to our first great principle…. The British state must follow the race, must comprehend it wherever it settles in appreciable numbers as an independent community. If the swarms constantly being thrown off the parent hive are lost to the State, the State is irreparably weakened. We cannot afford to part with so much of our best blood. We have already parted with much of it, to form the millions of another separate but fortunately friendly state. We cannot afford a repetition of the process.”

    Milner’s mentor, Cecil Rhodes, was also a protégé of Lord Salisbury. The works of Ruskin and social Darwinist Charles Dilke, who was elected a Liberal member of the Parliament in the 1880s, were freely circulated at the turn of the century. These manifestoes created the mental climate in which Wells, Russell, Rhodes, and Milner were nurtured. A generation later, it was Wells and Russell to whom young people would turn.

    In his book Greater Britain, Dilke had written:

    “In America we have seen the struggle of the dear races against the cheap–the endeavors of the English to hold their own against the Irish and Chinese. In New Zealand, we found the stronger and more energetic race pushing from the earth the shrewd and laborious descendants of the Asian Malays; in Australia, the English triumphant, and the cheaper races excluded from the soil not by distance merely, but by arbitrary legislation; in India, we saw the solution of the problem by the officering of the cheaper by the dearer race. Everywhere, we have found that the difficulties which impede the progress to universal dominion of the English people lie in the conflict with the cheaper races. The result of our survey is such as to give us reason for the belief that race distinctions will long continue, that miscegenation will go but a little way towards blending races, that the dearer are on the whole likely to destroy the cheaper peoples and that Saxondom will rise triumphant from the doubtful struggle.”

    Ruskin expressed the same ideas in a speech that Cecil Rhodes carried with him as a treasured possession, given in his inaugural lecture as Slade Professor of Art at Oxford in 1870:

    “A destiny is now possible to us, the highest ever set before a nation to be accepted or refused. Will you youths of England make your country again a royal throne of kings, a sceptred isle, for all the world a source of light, a center of peace? This is what England must do or perish. She must found colonies as fast and as far as she is able, formed of the most energetic and worthiest men; seizing any piece of fruitful waste ground she can set her foot on, and then teaching her colonists that their chief virtue is to be fidelity to their country and that their first aim is to be to advance the power of England by land and sea.”

    As a colonist to South Africa, Rhodes answered Ruskin’s call, creating the countries of South Africa and Rhodesia with the support of Salisbury. As a major partner in the DeBeers diamond mining company and Consolidated Goldfields, which he founded with Rothschild financial backing, he was brought into the darker side of the Empire as well, the openly acknowledged “secret” British opium trade from India and China. (Diamonds serve as a medium of exchange at the top levels of the opium trade, and in normal periods of currency exchange, variations in gold and diamond prices are closely tied to fluctuations in the opium markets.)

    Rhodes[‘s] … was the spirit that fired the Empire men, transmitted through Milner. Rhodes had formulated the idea for an elite secret society, to be modeled on the Jesuits, which would organize a fifth column in the United States, Germany, and Russia, and open pro-Empire societies in the colonies. The Coefficients, the Round Table, and its offshoots, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, whose first president was Cliveden’s Waldorf Astor, and New York City’s Council on Foreign Relations, are all products of his original inspiration.

    Afflicted with a heart condition, Rhodes wrote numbers of wills assigning his fortune to trustees who would carry out his purpose. Lord Milner was the first trustee, Lord Lothian his successor. The Rhodes scholarship, which selects American graduate students for postgraduate training at Oxford, is subsidized by the Trust. In its time it has recruited a number of leading American renegades to the service of the Empire.

    Rhodes’s first will, written at the age of twenty-four, included the following passage directing that his fortune form the endowment of a “secret society” devoted to:

    “The extension of British rule throughout the world … the colonization by British subjects of all lands where the means of livelihood are attainable by energy, labour, and enterprise and especially the occupation by British settlers of the entire Continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, the islands of Cyprus and Candia, the whole of South Africa, the islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay Archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire….”< p>

    Mackinder’s Geopolitics
    War, it was agreed, was necessary. The question to be solved was what policy would assure victory.

    To understand how British policy evolved coherently, it is necessary to understand that the argument as we have so far followed it has understated the situation in which the British found themselves.

    In his book Democratic Ideals and Reality published in 1919, Halford Mackinder polemicized against the British aristocracy and its minions who take their distaste for industrialism and science to the point that they fail to even study maps. Perhaps he was remembering an incident involving Robert Cecil, cabinet minister of the blockade of the Austro-Hungarian empire. In the Foreign Office one day, Cecil called for a map of his target, then complained to the political intelligence specialist that the long-straggling territory of Galicia had been wrongly colored. “It should be Hungarian, not Austrian,” Cecil said.

    “But sir, I’m from Galicia,” the specialist replied, “and it is indeed in Austria.”

    Cecil paused, then murmured, “What a funny shape Austria must be.”

    The incident occurred three years after Cecil had assumed responsibility for organizing the blockade of that country. At Versailles he was one of those responsible for cutting off such protuberances from the map of Austria.

    When Mackinder complained that “every educated German is a geographer in a sense that is true of very few Englishmen … Berlin-Baghdad, Berlin-Peking … involve for most Anglo-Saxons a new mode of thought,” he was talking about more than mere map-reading. As he developed the point: “The map habit of thought is no less pregnant in the sphere of economics than it is in that of strategy. True that laissez-faire had little use for it, but the `most favored nation’ clause which Germany imposed on defeated France in the Treaty of Frankfurt had quite a different meaning for the strategical German mind to that which was attached to it by honest Cobdenites. The German bureaucrat built upon it a whole structure of preferences for German trade. Of what use to Britain under her northern skies was the most favored nation clause when Germany granted a concession to Italy in the matter of import duties on olive oil? Would there not also be railway trucks to be returned to Italy which might as well return loaded with German exports?”

    Later, in Democratic Ideals and Reality, Mackinder took the theme further. Referring to the free trade theory of Adam Smith, which premised British survival on economic warfare and the hegemony of the British cloth industry based upon cultivation of cotton by slave labor in the southern states of the United States, Mackinder wrote:

    “That may have been a tenable theme in the time of Adam Smith and for a generation or two afterwards. But under modern conditions the Going Concern, or in other words, accumulating financial and industrial strength, is capable of outweighing most natural facilities…. When the stress began after 1878, British agriculture waned, though British industry continued to grow. But presently lopsidedness developed even within British industry; the cotton and shipbuilding branches still grew, but the chemical and electrical branches did not increase proportionately.”

    Mackinder slid over the essential issue. By the time of the McKinley presidency in 1897, the U.S., German, Japanese, and Russian industrial development were overtaking Britain. Some statistics help tell the story. In 1870, Britain smelted one-half the world’s iron and produced one-half of the world’s textiles, but by 1897 Britain produced less of each than the United States, and only slightly more than Germany. Not only was this the case, but pig iron production between 1870 and 1897 increased 966 percent in the United States and 609 percent in Germany, creating the industrial base for exports and overseas capital investment.

    In this same period, U.S. exports in general expanded 300 percent, and German exports by 100 percent; Britain’s increase in exports was a mere 30 percent. American commerce was also penetrating British colonies at a pace deemed extremely dangerous to imperial ties, leading to “Americanization” of the colonies. America and Germany, and even Russia and Japan, were destroying Britain’s commercial and therefore financial domination of the world. This stagnation of British manufacture was compensated for only by the role of the pound sterling as a reserve currency, which allowed it to operate as a looting instrument. Yet in 1887, by Britain’s own official statistics, its national debt amounted to fully 7.1 percent of the national revenue as compared to the United States, where the national debt was a mere 1.7 percent of national wealth.

    Underneath the rhetoric, the British oligarchy knew that it was engaged in a life-and-death struggle against France, Russia, Germany, and the United States if it was to maintain hegemony. That is the political doctrine behind Mackinder’s code phrases. In Democratic Ideals and Reality, written at the end of the First World War, he declared:

    “The Heartland, for the purposes of strategical thinking includes the Baltic Sea, the navigable Middle and Lower Danube, the Black Sea, Asia Minor, Armenia, Persia, Tibet, and Mongolia. Within it, therefore, were Brandenburg-Prussia, and Austria-Hungary, as well as Russia…. Towards the end of the century, however, the Germans of Prussia and Austria determined to subdue the Slavs and to exploit them for the occupation of the Heartland, through which run the land-ways into China, India, Arabia, and the African Heartland…. We have defeated the danger on this occasion, but the facts of geography remain.”

    It is only necessary to read “industrial development” into the content of the word “geography” and Mackinder’s thinly veiled point is clear. Unless Germany and Russia were subdued, unless their industrial back were broken, Britain was in serious trouble. If Germany and Russia were to ally, Britain would be finished. This was the reality underlying the policy debate witnessed at the Coefficients’ dinner table. This was the policy that governed the British Empire from the close of World War I through World War II.

    The policy ultimately adopted can be broken down into four parts:

    1. Immediately a policy of destabilizations was necessary to prevent alliances between Britain’s perceived potential enemies. Since French and Russian ties were long-standing, it was critical to prevent a Franco-German rapprochement. For similar reasons, a Russian-Japanese alliance was to be avoided. Adversary relations of intensity had to be introduced at all costs.

    2. In the medium term, the solution to a potential Russo-German accord lay in encouraging the dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. In that way, a buffer state of squabbling “balkanized” states would be established between Russia and Germany, thus preventing the joining of the “Eurasian heartland” in a Grand Design for industrial progress.

    3. Also for the medium term, it was necessary to adopt a “Hamiltonian” policy of state support for British industrial war preparations. The Empire had to be solidified politically around a “Hamiltonian” model of federation with some form of economic protection or subsidy to guarantee the loyalty of the colonies, a policy that was not completely carried through until the evolution of the British Commonwealth after World War II.

    4. For the long term, it was necessary to turn back the clock on scientific and industrial progress by ushering in a new dark age of wars, famine, and epidemic. World War I was to be the beginning. The differences fought out over the dinner table in 1903 were of mere secondary tactical significance before the overriding policy objectives upon which both factions were agreed.

    A list of primary and secondary sources used for this chapter is available from New Federalist.


    The preceding article is a rough version of the article that appeared in The American Almanac. It is made available here with the permission of The New Federalist Newspaper. Any use of, or quotations from, this article must attribute them to The New Federalist, and The American Almanac.

    Publications and Subscriptions for sale.

    Readings from the American Almanac. Contact us at: american_almanac@yahoo.com.

  • The Coefficients Club


    In light of these disturbing synchronicities, the viability of sci-fi “predictive programming” certainly seems stronger. The case is only strengthened when one examines Wells’s affiliations. In addition to being a Fabian socialist and Freemason, Wells was also a member of the Coefficients Club. Formed by Fabian socialist Beatrice Webb, this organization assembled some of Britain’s most prominent social critics and thinkers to discuss the course of the British Empire.

    One of the Club’s members was none other than Fabian socialist and Malthusian ideologue Bertrand Russell. According to Russell, Wells and several other members harbored an overwhelming preoccupation with war. Russell explains:

    …in 1902, I became a member of a small dining club called the Coefficients, got up by Sidney Webb for the purpose of considering political questions from a more or less Imperialist point of view. It was in this club that I first became acquainted with H. G. Wells, of whom I had never heard until then. His point of view was more sympathetic to me than that of any member. Most of the members, in fact, shocked me profoundly. I remember Amery’s eyes gleaming with blood-lust at the thought of a war with America, in which, as he said with exultation, we should have to arm the whole adult male population. One evening Sir Edward Grey (not then in office) made a speech advocating the policy of Entente, which had not yet been adopted by the Government. I stated my objections to the policy very forcibly, and pointed out the likelyhood of its leading to war, but no one agreed with me, so I resigned from the Club. It will be seen that I began my opposition to the first war at the earliest possible moment. (230)

    Indeed, the Club’s proclivities towards war were strong. One Club member, Leo Maxse, had promoted war with Germany in 1902. This preoccupation with war is especially evident in much of Wells’s scientific romances. Moreover, a great deal of Wells’s work acknowledges the alchemical role of war in man’s purported evolutionary development. J.P. Vernier observes:

    …I would suggest that evolution, as presented by Wells, that is a kind of mutation resulting in the confrontation of man with different species, is one of the main themes of modern science fiction. (“Evolution as a Literary Theme in H.G. Wells’s Science Fiction,” 85)

    Recall the dialectical framework intrinsic to evolutionary theory. The organism (thesis) comes into conflict with nature (antithesis) resulting in a newly enhanced species (synthesis), the culmination of the evolutionary process (Marrs 127). In the case of Wells’s work, the critical mutation within humanity was facilitating by confrontation with other species (including other species of man).

    Hitler’s genocidal Final Solution tangibly enacted such a dialectical framework. The German people (thesis) came into conflict with the Jew (antithesis) in hopes of creating the Aryan (synthesis). The fact that Wells “predicted” this suggests that he was privy to certain plans. Such plans may have circulated within the Coefficient Club, among other elitist think tanks. Whatever the case might be, World War II certainly synchronized with the evolutionary designs of Wells and his other oligarchical colleagues.

    In the next installment of this series, we shall examine the specific ways in which the supranational elite engineered World War II.

  • http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/Fall02/Moon.html

    The Moon cult and the Unity of the Sciences Movement are two operations spun out of a London thinktank in the early part of the 20th century, known variously as the Coefficients Club, the Roundtable, and Milner’s Kindergarten. Leading strategists included Lord Robert Cecil, Lord Alfred Milner, Leo Amery, Halford Mackinder, H.G. Wells, and Lord Bertrand Russell. The problem facing them was how to maintain the power of a maritime-based, financier oligarchy, in a world threatened by the growing industrial strength of the United States, Germany, France, and, Japan. World War I was their first big project; the failed League of Nations the second.

    The Program
    In 1928, their propagandist Wells, issued the program of the grouping in a book titled The Open Conspiracy. The plan, openly discussed, was to create a “new world religion” that would channel the power of self-sacrifice, characteristic of religious zeal, into implementing the goals of the conspiracy. These were, as summarized by Wells:

    “Firstly, the entirely provisional nature of all existing governments, and the entirely provisional nature, therefore, of all loyalties associated therewith:

    Secondly, the supreme importance of population control in human biology and the possibility it affords us of a release from the pressure of the struggle for existence on ourselves; and
    Thirdly, the urgent necessity of protective resistance against the present traditional drift towards war.”

    The first action of the “Open Conspiracy” was to be the cultivation of a mass-based peace movement. It began at Oxford University, and spread among student populations in Europe and the U.S.A. in the 1930s, in the form of a solemn, signed pledge never to participate in any war, and to refuse service if drafted.

    The organizer of the movement, which later became known as Moral Re-Armament, was an American preacher turned British intelligence agent, named Frank Buchman. He was an ardent admirer of Hitler, and included Gestapo chief Himmler and Rudolf Hess in his membership lists. But Buchman was also supported by the Archbishop of Canterbury, and counted Edward VIII, when he was Prince of Wales, as a member. In the U.S.A., his pre-war supporters included movie mogul Louis Mayer, Los Angeles Times publisher Harry Chandlee, and David Dubinsky of the International Ladies Garment Workers Union.

    After World War II, Buchman’s Moral Re-Armament emerged as a major cold war vehicle, particularly in Western Europe and the Far East. His 1949 conference in Switzerland was attended by European parliamentarians and a bipartisan delegation of the U.S. Congress, flown in by military aircraft.

    Moon’s Korean ministry got plugged into Moral Re-Armament at the time of the Korean War, or before. After the war, the small Moon operation was picked up by military intelligence circles connected with the notorious MK-ultra program for psychedelic drug experimentation, and Tavistock-originated group dynamics programs for social manipulation. He was set up in the United States, under highest level intelligence cover, in the early to middle 1960s.

    The Cult of Science
    Apart from the mass peace movement, the other side of the Open Conspiracy involved science in two ways:

    First, to build a weapon of mass destruction so terrible it could be used to force nations to forego their sovereignty. Wells’s Hungarian disciple, physicist Leo Szilard, played the leading role in this. Szilard was the real-life model for Dr. Strangelove in Stanley Kubrick’s famous film of that name, and also the lifelong friend and political adviser to Eugene Wigner.1

    Second, to turn biology from the science of life into a branch of inorganic physics.2

    To accomplish this, it was necessary to first degrade the scientist’s conception of himself. Another member of the Coefficients Club, Lord Bertrand Russell, played the key role in this. Russell was a product of the Cambridge Aristotelian Society. His early career was built on an absurdly incompetent attack on philosopher Gottfried Leibniz3 and Carl Friedrich Gauss’s greatest student, Bernhard Riemann. The essence of it all was to prove that universal genius was impossible, human creativity did not exist, and the mind is only a collection of logical elements (which artificial intelligence would later attempt to replicate out of electronic spare parts).

    Russell’s dilletantish excursions into philosophy were consistent with the program of the Machian-influenced logical positivism of the Vienna Circle, and John Dewey’s pragmatism. The denial of the synthetic a priori, i.e. creativity, and consequent reduction of all knowledge to mere logical formalism, is the common feature of both systems.

    In 1935, refugee members of the logical positivist Vienna Circle joined with a collection of American Trotskyists grouped around John Dewey in the first meetings of the Unity of Sciences movement in New York. At a 1938 meeting at the University of Pennsylvania, with Russell in attendance, the Unity of Sciences movement was launched in earnest.

    This was the operation that the Reverend Moon’s Unification Church incorporated under its wing in 1972.

    Dr. Strangelove, meet the Reverend Moon.

  • Dear Craig,

    If the Jesuits controlled the Cecils, and Lord Cecil controlled the Fabian Socialists, and the Fabians controlled the British Labor Party and BLP’s SIS controlled the Bolshevik Revolution after which the Jesuits were readmitted into Russia in 1922 (and Lenin converted the USSR to the Jesuit authored
    Gregorian Calendar in 1923), the the Jesuits via the Cecils brought about the Bolshevik Revolution. Correct?

    Brother Eric

  • Vatican debates good versus evil of Harry Potter

    From correspondents in Vatican City
    January 15, 2008 07:09am

    THE Vatican newspaper today published good versus evil takes on the Harry Potter books, the fictional boy wizard star of the runaway best-selling books by JK Rowling.

    The series drew criticism from the future Pope Benedict XVI in 2003 when he voiced fears over “subtle seductions” in the saga that could undermine children’s religious development by blurring the line between good and evil.

    Under the headline “The Double Face of Harry Potter”, an expert in English literature, Edoardo Rialti, argues in L’Osservatore Romano that the then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was right to worry.

    In the opposing view, Catholic essayist and writer Paolo Gulisano wrote that “behind the fabulous adventures of the different characters you can see the author’s anthropological vision”.

    Rowlings, writing for a “post-modern” and individualistic world, “wants to help the young reader understand that ‘doing good’ is the best thing to do”, Gulisano wrote.

    The future pope’s fears were contained in a March 2003 letter to German Catholic sociologist Gabriele Kuby, author of the book Harry Potter – Good or Evil.

    She made the letter public in July 2005.

    “It is good that you shed light and inform us on the Harry Potter matter, for these are subtle seductions that are barely noticeable and precisely because of that deeply affect (children) and corrupt the Christian faith in souls even before it could properly grow and mature,” Cardinal Ratzinger wrote.

    He voiced the fear that young minds will “lose the spirit of discernment between good and evil and that they will not have the necessary strength and knowledge to withstand the temptations to evil”.

  • Harry Potter and the Order of the Illuminati

    Take note that the KEYSTONE is actually the SUMMER SOLSTICE, so once again THE SUN.

    Take note that R may be 18 which is 666 which is the Energy from the Holy Sun Crown. But R is also the Pregnant female having her waters burst. Once again Lunar and Venusian.

    Take note that the Sexual union is known as the GENERATIVE PRINCIPLE which is symbolised as the G in the Circle. The Circle is the Goddess Circe linked to Venus/Female and the Yoni. The G is the Phallic coming from Hebrew Pei when rotated.

    If you look at the Watch highlighted you’ll see 11:59 once again we see the 11 of Horus and Set at hand. The addition of 11+59 = 70 and 7 is the Purification of the Spirit. Theres others too. The watch then goes to 12:00 which is Midday with the Sun linking more into Osiris. 12 is symbolism for the Lion and the 12 rays of the Sun. The watch itself is from the Stellar Cult with the round face being the female/egg/lucifer. The hours hand is Horus whilst the minutes is Lunar/Isis and the seconds is Enki/Mercury. The twelve numbers are the houses of the Mazzaroth. The strap is the yoni whilst the arm is the Yod. Note the silver bezzel linked to the lunar cult.

    The various pentagrams etc are VENUSIAN or LUCIFERIAN

    Candles are Phallic and Light linking to the Sun Phallic of Osiris as he impregants Mother Earth at Sunset.

    Remember the rings of Saturn are represented by hats and their rims. Notice the black of the Saturnalian cult.

    Owls are Venusian all seeing all knowledge linked through goddess Minerva. A white owl is very ISISian as the moon is also represented as white. Notice a bird cage is usually as in this video, like an arch shape. This links to the Royal Arch of freemasonry representing the Spring Equinox, Summer Solstice, Autumnal Equinox. Also of course the twin phallic pillars of horus and set again. Notice how the owl is inbetween the pillars as the IOI or 151 VENUSIAN. Notice the venusian circles between the phallic pillars in the broomstick sport.

    The snake is representative of the Brotherhood of the Snake etc but also of the pleaides constellation. Also linked to DNA. Goes back into the stellar cult.

    The black of white squares are of dualism, good/bad, yin/yang. The square is EL the god of Saturn representing the four corners of Earth and so forth.

    -The Unhived Mind

  • According to Pastor Meyer, the movie series names them at:



    Harry Potter?
    What Does God Have To Say?

    I am writing this urgent message because I was once a witch. I lived by the stars as an astrologer and numerologist casting horoscopes and spells. I lived in the mysterious and shadowy realm of the occult. By means of spells and magic, I was able to invoke the powers of the “controlling unknown” and fly upon the night winds transcending the astral plane. Halloween was my favorite time of the year and I was intrigued and absorbed in the realm of Wiccan witchcraft. All of this was happening in the decade of the 1960’s when witchcraft was just starting to come out of the broom closet.

    It was during that decade of the 1960’s, in the year 1966, that a woman named J.K. Rowling was born. This is the woman who has captivated the world in this year of 2000 with four books known as the “Harry Potter Series.” These books are orientational and instructional manuals of witchcraft woven into the format of entertainment. These four books by J.K. Rowling teach witchcraft! I know this because I was once very much a part of that world.

    Witchcraft was very different in the 1960’s. There were a lot fewer witches, and the craft was far more secretive. At the end of that spiritually troubled decade, I was miraculously saved by the power of Jesus Christ and His saving blood. I was also delivered from every evil spirit that lived in me and was set free. However, as I began to attend fundamental Christian churches, I realized that even there witchcraft had left its mark. Pagan holidays and sabats were celebrated as “Christian holidays.”

    As time went on, I watched the so-called “Christian” churches compromising and unifying. I also watched with amazement as teachings from Eastern religions and “New Age” doctrine began to captivate congregations. It was a satanic set-up, and I saw it coming. Illuministic conspirators were bringing forth a one-world religion with a cleverly concealed element of occultism interwoven in its teachings.

    In order to succeed in bringing witchcraft to the world and thus complete satanic control, an entire generation would have to be induced and taught to think like witches, talk like witches, dress like witches, and act like witches. The occult songs of the 1960’s launched the Luciferian project of capturing the minds of an entire generation. In the song “Sound Of Silence” by Paul Simon and Art Garfunkel, we were told of seeds that were left while an entire generation was sleeping, and that the “vision that was planted in my brain still remains.”

    Now it is the year 2000. All of the foundations for occultism and witchcraft are in place. The Illuminists have to move quickly, because time is running out.

    It was the Communist revolutionary Lenin who said, “Give me one generation of youth, and I will transform the entire world.” Now an entire generation of youth has been given to a woman named J.K. Rowling and her four books on witchcraft, known as the Harry Potter Series.

    As a former witch, I can speak with authority when I say that I have examined the works of Rowling and that the Harry Potter books are training manuals for the occult. Untold millions of young people are being taught to think, speak, dress and act like witches by filling their heads with the contents of these books. Children are obsessed with the Harry Potter books that they have left television and video games to read these witchcraft manuals.

    The first book of the series, entitled “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone”, finds the orphan, Harry Potter, embarking into a new realm when he is taken to “Hogwart’s School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.” At this occult school, Harry Potter learns how to obtain and use witchcraft equipment. Harry also learns a new vocabulary, including words such as “Azkaban”, “Circe”, “Draco”, “Erised”, “Hermes”, and “Slytherin”; all of which are names of real devils or demons. These are not characters of fiction!

    How serious is this? By reading these materials, many millions of young people are learning how to work with demon spirits. They are getting to know them by name. Vast numbers of children professing to be Christians are also filling their hearts and minds, while willingly ignorant parents look the other way.

    The titles of the books should be warning enough to make us realize how satanic and anti-christ these books are. The afore mentioned title of the first book, “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone”, was a real give away. The second book was called “Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets”, while the third book was entitled “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban.”

    Sadly enough, this blatant witchcraft has been endorsed by well-known and respected “Christian” leaders, such as Dr. James Dobson and Chuck Colson, who have proven themselves to be modern day Judas Iscariots. Nothing could be more obvious than that Harry Potter books are pure witchcraft and of the devil. The “Christian” leaders, however, defend them by saying that good magic always wins and overcomes evil magic.

    This is the oldest con game ever hatched out of hell. As a real witch, I learned about the two sides of “the force.” Apparently, so do many “Christian” leaders. When real witches have sabats and esbats and meet as a coven, they greet each other by saying “Blessed be”, and when they part, they say “The Force be with you.” Both sides of this “Force” are Satan. It is not a good side of the force that overcomes the bad side of the force, but rather it’s the blood of Jesus Christ that destroys both supposed sides of the satanic “Force.”

    High level witches believe that there are seven satanic princes and that the seventh, which is assigned to Christians, has no name. In coven meetings, he is called “the nameless one.” In the Harry Potter books, there is a character called “Voldemort.” The pronunciation guide says of this being “He who must not be named.”

    On July 8 at midnight, bookstores everywhere were stormed by millions of children to obtain the latest and fourth book of the series known as “Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.” These books were taken into homes everywhere with a real evil spirit following each copy to curse those homes. July 8th was also the 18th day (three sixes in numerology) from the witches’ sabat of midsummer. July 8th was also the 13th day from the signing of the United Religions Charter in San Francisco. Now we have learned that the public school system is planning to use the magic of Harry Potter in the classrooms making the public schools centers of witchcraft training.

    What does God have to say about such books as the Harry Potter series? In the Bible in the book of Acts, we read the following in the 19th chapter, verses 18 – 20: “And many that believed came, and confessed, and shewed their deeds. Many of them also which used curious arts brought their books together and burned them before all men: and they counted the price of them, and found it fifty thousand pieces of silver. So mightily grew the Word of God and prevailed.”

    As parents, we will answer to God if we allow our children to read witchcraft books. The Word of God will prevail mightily in your life only if such things of Satan are destroyed. This tract has been prayed over, and I hope it has helped you. If we may be of further assistance, please contact us.

    Pastor David J. Meyer

    Published by:
    Last Trumpet Ministries International
    PO Box 806
    Beaver Dam, WI 53916



    is the link for more research.

    Predictive programming Harry Potter and Twilight encourages youth to bad behaviour

Leave a Reply