AIPAC suppresses report highlighting Mossad involvement in 9/11 attacks

Israel suppressing report on 9/11 role: Intelligence analyst

Wed Dec 25, 2013 8:59AM GMT

The Israeli lobby in the US has been trying to “suppress” a revealing 28-page section of a classified Congressional report on the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks that reportedly points to Israeli involvement in 9/11, says an intelligence analyst, Press TV reports.

The classified 800-page Congressional Investigative Report on 9/11 contains a section called “Specific Sources of Foreign Support,” where a 28-page chunk has been “‘butchered’ by the White House on the personal orders of [former US] President [George W.] Bush,” Gordon Duff wrote in an article for Press TV on Wednesday.

In the redacted report that had been presented to the Congress, “an estimated 5-10,000 words were omitted” from the noted section, “with page after page of dotted lines replacing text.”

The American analyst pointed to attempts by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the powerful Israeli lobby in the US, to suppress the pieces of information in the report, which reportedly identified involvement by the Israeli intelligence in planning and carrying out the 9/11 attacks.

“This is only the most recent of revelations that AIPAC has managed to suppress through pressuring Congress and its powerful assets in the press,” Duff wrote.

“What is increasingly clear,” he went on to explain, “is that many of AIPAC’s allies in Washington had access to the non-redacted report.”

On September 11, 2001, a series of coordinated attacks were carried out in the United States, leaving almost 3,000 people dead.

According to the official account by the US, during the 9/11 attacks, 19 “al-Qaeda terrorists” hijacked four commercial passenger jet airliners and crashed two of them into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, killing everyone on board and many others in the buildings.

The hijackers crashed a third airliner into the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, just outside Washington, D.C.

Following the attacks, the US government set up the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, publicly referred to as the 9/11 Commission, on November 27, 2002, “to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11 attacks.”

“An entire administration, leaders in Congress and the Pentagon, the CIA, NSA and a dozen other organizations, all knew what was in the congressional report,” Duff wrote in his article, adding, “They all lied to the 9/11 Commission. They all ordered measures to suppress freedom at home and to butcher hundreds of thousands around the world, kidnap and torture thousand more, all based on lies.”

The United States, under the presidency of Bush, attacked Afghanistan to remove the Taliban regime, which Washington accused of harboring the “al-Qaeda” terrorists involved in the 9/11 attacks.

“Often we hear it asked, ‘How could thousands be involved in a conspiracy so heinous?’ We now stand ready to answer. The time has come to ask,” Duff concluded.

The global US military campaign, which came to be known as the “war on terror,” was modified under President Barack Obama, who, despite having called for an end to the US wars in Afghanistan and Iraq during his election campaign, virtually expanded US military adventures by shifting from boots on the ground to killer drones in different countries in the world.


  • theunhivedmind

    ‘Mossad, Bush planned, executed 9/11’

    Wed Dec 25, 2013 8:19AM GMT
    By Gordon Duff

    Recent revelations published on the Press TV website, the New York Post and Veterans Today have changed history.

    The story was simple, two American congressional representatives were allowed to read the Congressional 9/11 Investigation Report, this time including the areas President Bush had ordered removed. Both congressmen clearly state that the redacted pages of the report place full responsibility for the planning and execution of 9/11 on one or more foreign intelligence agencies, not “terrorists.”

    What is also clear is that President Bush’s personal role in covering this up protected the real perpetrators of 9/11 and pushed the US into, not just two insane wars but draconian moves against America’s government.

    The NSA and the Bush 9/11 coup

    Nine eleven was a coup against the constitution. Additional reports released this week make clear some of the reasons Bush lied to the American people, to congress, our military and our allies, “Obama’s Director for National Intelligence, James Clapper, has declassified new documents that reveal how the NSA was first given the green light to start collecting bulk communication data in the hunt for Al-Qaeda terrorists after 9/11. President Barack Obama’s administration has for the first time publicly confirmed ‘the existence of collection activities authorized by President George W. Bush,’ such as bulk amounts of Internet and phone metadata, as part of the ‘Terrorist Surveillance Program’ (TSP). The disclosures are part of Washington’s campaign to justify the NSA’s surveillance activities, following massive leaks to the media about the classified programs by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. Clapper explained on Saturday that President George W. Bush first authorized the spying in October 2001, just weeks after the September 11 attacks.”

    We can prove Bush was fully criminally culpable in covering the tracks of those responsible for 9/11.

    AIPAC through Bandar and bush “under a bus”

    More frighteningly, the articles published this week in Rupert Murdoch’s New York Daily News, written by Hoover Institute fellow and AIPAC member, Paul Sperry, now not only blame Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia as the 9/11 mastermind but tie Bush (43) in as well.

    In fact, the entire AIPAC apparatus, the largest lobbying organization in Washington, is currently engaged in a “full court press,” to stop congress from pushing for the release of the real report. Is this because the real report accuses Israel, not Saudi Arabia, and AIPAC wants the Murdoch/Sperry story to stand?

    Bin Laden myth “crashes down”

    The real report, called “shocking” by the legislators, who have called for President Obama to declassify the entire report, proves that there was no al-Qaeda involvement, no reason to invade Afghanistan or Iraq and no reason to hunt CIA operative, Colonel Tim Osman, also known as “Osama bin Laden.”

    In fact, Ambassador Lee Wanta, a former White House Intelligence Chief and Inspector General of the Department of Defense under Reagan, has cited meetings between key government officials and “bin Laden” that he attended, meetings held in both Los Angeles and Washington DC while the US was supposedly hunting him.

    From Wanta, who was present during these meetings, “In early 1990, bin Laden, suffering from advanced kidney disease, was flown to an American facility in the Persian Gulf. From there, bin Laden flew to Los Angeles, landing in the Ontario airport, met by Albert Hakim, representing President Bush (41), Ollie North (free on appeal bond), Admiral William Dickie, attorney Glenn Peglau and General Jack Singlaub, one of the founders of the CIA. Hakim was the personal representative of President Bush and in overall charge of the project. ‘Bud’ McFarlane, an Iran-Contra figure pardoned by President Bush in 1992, was also a part of the group.
    Bin Laden then left Los Angeles for Washington DC. There he stayed in the Mayflower Hotel. Meetings were held at the Metropolitan Club in Washington. Attorney Glenn Peglau stayed at the Metropolitan. While there, Peglau’s room was broken into and “items” removed. At no point is there record, classified or public, that this ‘working group’ was ever dissolved nor is there any record that Osama bin Laden’s status as a security operative working for the US government ever ended. In 2001, Osama bin Laden’s last public statement denied any involvement in the 9/11 attacks. There are no classified documents tying bin Laden to 9/11 or citing him to be a ‘rogue CIA operative.’”

    Which 9/11 is real?

    In 2007, the FBI flew a team to Bangkok to interview former Soviet nuclear intelligence specialist Dimitri Khalezov. Khalezov told the FBI that, in the morning of September 12, 2001, he attended a breakfast gathering with Mossad Operations Chief Mike Harari and his son along with other Israeli operatives.

    Khalezov reported to the FBI that this gathering was to celebrate the 9/11 attacks, not as Netanyahu had said, as a “fortunate happenstance for Israel” but as a Mossad attack on the United States. At that meeting, Harari also claimed credit for a role in the Oklahoma City bombing. According to Khalezov, Harari was courting him to join their group for an upcoming operation, a bombing attack on Bali, scheduled for 2002.

    On October 12, 2002, a huge explosive device devastated nearly a square mile killing 202 people. An Islamic group was blamed, just as with not just 9/11 but, initially, Oklahoma City as well.

    Khalezov told FBI agents that Harari claimed nuclear weapons were used to bring down the twin towers on 9/11. Harari also said he got a “cruise type” missile, a Soviet “Granit” for the Pentagon attack, purchased through Victor Bout, the “Lord of War” played by Nicholas Cage in the film of the same name.

    Bout, residing in Bangkok with Harari and Khalezov, was extradited to the United States based on a highly classified indictment accusing him of supplying the guided missile used to attack the Pentagon on 9/11. Bout was arrested in Bangkok in 2008, not long after the FBI visit. He was officially convicted of supplying arms to rebels in Colombia, an activity Bout had long been engaged in on behalf of the CIA, his arms dealing partners for many years.


    Thus far, the initial report to congress on the Bush falsification does not qualify as a leak. Only Bush stands accused, the 9/11 perpetrators are still safe, their identities still protected by security protocols maintained by President Obama, despite congressional demands.

    “Claimed” leaks reported by Sperry in the Washington Post blame Bandar and Saudi Intelligence for 9/11. Sperry cites the CIA as a source but, quite suspiciously, seems to be attempting to deflect the possible fallout against Israel when or if then real report is made public. The Sperry story, coordinated with AIPAC’s moves to quell congress’s demand to declassify the report may well be an indication that Israeli intelligence, as Khalezov indicates, worked with Bush to plan and execute 9/11.

    From the Press TV article: “This week, Congressional representatives Stephen Lynch (D-MA) and Walter Jones (R-NC) have officially requested a congressional resolution demanding President Obama declassify the heavily redacted Congressional Investigative Report on 9/11. The two representatives had just been given authority under penalty of ‘national security secrecy’ to read the censored 28 pages of the 800-page report that had not been seen. What has been made clear is that President Bush was fully aware that neither Afghanistan nor Iraq were involved in 9/11 and that military action against those two nations was done to cover involvement of his administration in 9/11, involvement that included support from foreign intelligence agencies. The representatives, while reviewing the report, came to the portion titled ‘Specific Sources of Foreign Support.’
    A 28-page section here had been ‘butchered’ by the White House on the personal orders of President Bush. On the original report given to Congress, an estimated 5-10,000 words were omitted from this section with page after page of dotted lines replacing text.”

    This is only the most recent of revelations that AIPAC has managed to suppress through pressuring congress and its powerful assets in the press. What is increasingly clear is that many of AIPAC’s allies in Washington had access to the non-redacted report. An entire administration, leaders in congress and the Pentagon, the CIA, NSA and a dozen other organizations, all knew what was in the congressional report. They all lied to the 9/11 Commission. They all ordered measures to suppress freedom at home and to butcher hundreds of thousands around the world, kidnap and torture thousand more, all based on lies.

    Countries were virtually wiped off the map on a whim. Often we hear it asked, “How could thousands be involved in a conspiracy so heinous?” We now stand ready to answer. The time has come to ask.

  • theunhivedmind

    9/11 truth vs. Takfiri terror

    Mon Dec 23, 2013 6:20AM GMT
    By Kevin Barrett

    A new anti-terror alliance is shaping up in the Middle East. Its most powerful weapon: the suppressed truth about 9/11.

    In her article “Security arc forms against Mideast terror,” Sharmine Narwani writes of a rapid regional re-alignment “guided primarily by the ‘security threat’ posed by the proliferation of extremist, sectarian … fighters in numbers unseen even in Afghanistan or Iraq.”

    Narwani is not just talking about the Takfiris who are running wild in Syria beheading Christians, traditional Sunni, Shi’a, and Alawi Muslims, and anyone else who disagrees with them. The same kind of terrorists are also committing countless atrocities in Iraq, while sectarian extremism is likewise growing in Libya, Lebanon, and elsewhere.

    In response, governments in the region and around the world are re-orienting and re-aligning. Even the USA, the failed world hegemon, is on the brink of a 180-degree shift. Narwani explains: “The Americans are in an extremely difficult position: to tackle the spread of extremists, they will have to support military and security solutions from old foes in the region – Iran, Syria, Hezbollah. For starters, this means that 30-plus years of ‘policy’ will literally be flushed away and Washington risks alienating longtime regional allies. Moreover, a successful outcome, i.e. eliminating extremism, will almost certainly mean the ascendency of Iran and the downfall of the US’ ally Saudi Arabia – among the many other reverberations throughout the Mideast that this will entail.”

    US policy pivoted away from the Saudis and their Israeli allies in the wake of the August false-flag chemical weapons attack near Damascus. Seymour Hersh recently revealed that top US officials knew in August that Saudi Intelligence chief Bandar Bin Sultan, rather than Syrian President Assad, was probably responsible. At first, the Obama Administration tried to deceive the world. Then it began to re-think the wisdom of helping Bandar and his band of Takfiri terrorists overthrow Assad.

    The downfall of Saudi Arabia as a US ally is evidenced by the sudden re-opening of long-dormant 9/11 investigations and lawsuits focusing on – who else – Bandar Bin Sultan, sometimes known as “Bandar Bush” due to his position as an honorary member of the Bush (crime) family. In Washington, D.C., Reps. Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) are sending chills up Bandar’s spine by calling for the declassification of the 2002 “Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.”

    Jones and Lynch say they are “absolutely shocked” by the report. They say it reveals that one or more foreign states were deeply involved in the 9/11 attacks. Though the report is classified, leaks have revealed that it targets Saudi Arabia, whose intelligence service apparently ran fifteen of the nineteen patsy “hijackers” who were – in reality – never even on the planes.

    This story isn’t new. Sen. Bob Graham (D-FL), Chair of the Joint Committee on 9/11, has been saying the same thing since 2002. Graham charges the Bush Administration, which classified the Joint Inquiry report, with orchestrating a cover-up. Many suspect Graham was forced to retire from the Senate due to his speaking out on 9/11 – just as Sen. Mark Dayton (D-MN) was forced to evacuate his entire staff from Washington and announce his retirement due to death threats he received after denouncing the US military’s lying to the American people about why America’s air defenses stood down on 9/11.

    Dayton and Graham were lucky; they were merely forced out of the US Senate. Two other Senators who wanted to investigate 9/11, Tom Daschle (D-SD) and Patrick Leahy (D-VT) were mailed ultra-weapons-grade US military anthrax, which fortunately did not kill them but did succeed in shutting them up. The one Senator who would never shut up, Paul Wellstone (D-MN), was murdered, along with his wife and daughter, in a rigged plane crash. Wellstone’s colleague and friend, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) confirmed that Wellstone had obviously been murdered, calling the killing “a message to us all.”

    9/11 is a sensitive and dangerous topic in some quarters.

    And yet today, as the US pivots away from Saudi Arabia and Israel, the 9/11 case is being re-opened – not only in the US Congress, but also in the federal court. A recent ABC News story headlined “9/11 Families ‘Ecstatic’ They Can Finally Sue Saudi Arabia” reported the 2nd Circuit Court’s ruling re-instating a 9/11 family members’ lawsuit against the Saudis.

    The million-dollar question: If the 9/11 case is re-opened, will the investigation stop with the Saudis? What about their American and Israeli accomplices?

    A recent article by Paul Sperry of the Hoover Institute, published by the New York Post, ties President George W. Bush to 9/11 conspiracies involving then-Saudi Ambassador “Bandar Bush.” Sperry describes Bush and Bandar breaking out expensive cigars to celebrate the success of 9/11: “The two old family friends shared cigars on the Truman Balcony [of the White House] while discussing the attacks.” Bush and Bandar’s cigar celebration occurred on September 13th, 2001, just two days after 9/11.

    Could the truth about these events change the world?

    9/11 officially launched the “war on terror,” which is actually a disguised war on Islam. Ironically, the West’s invasion of Muslim countries, and its controlled demolition of the rule of law, have created far more terrorism than they have stamped out.

    The myth of 9/11 – the claim that “al-Qaeda extremists were responsible” – has helped fuel the rise of Takfiri terrorism. The Takfiris imagine that heroic al-Qaeda hijackers struck an immense blow against the West on 9/11.

    The revelation of the truth about 9/11 would humiliate the Takfiri terrorists.

    The truth is that the Saudis and “al-Qaeda” are hapless, inept patsies. The Saudis can’t even fly and maintain the military planes they buy from the US with unearned oil money; while the four pilots blamed for the 9/11 attacks could not even fly Cessna training aircraft, much less jetliners.

    The nineteen alleged hijackers (or the intelligence agents who impersonated at least some of them) were alcohol-abusing, drug-snorting playboys. The Mohamed Atta who supposedly trained in Florida for 9/11 was an aggressive loudmouth who was fluent in Hebrew and whose favorite food was pork chops. This “Atta” walked into a Small Business Administration office shortly before 9/11 demanding a loan to buy a crop-duster. He let it be known that he wanted an aircraft to drop chemical weapons on Washington, DC, and ranted about his love for Bin Laden. “Atta” grew violently angry and refused to leave unless the SBA official handed him hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash to buy his crop-duster. The SBA person thought “Atta” was crazy and chased him out of the office.

    The Atta who visited the SBA was obviously an intelligence agent creating a “legend,” not a cunning terrorist planning the biggest attack in history.

    “Al-Qaeda” is a fake organization consisting of idiots, dupes, patsies, and infiltrators, along with a smattering of mercenaries, drug smugglers, and brainwashed extremists. “Al-Qaeda” operatives like Abdulmutallab the Underwear Bomber forget their passports, yet manage to board planes with the help of well-dressed security men. They are too stupid to know that plastic explosives will not explode without a detonator. They are barely capable of getting a match lit in their pathetic efforts to burn their own feet, or their own crotches, with the equivalent of sterno camping fuel.

    Mohamed Heikal, the Arab world’s leading political commentator, literally broke out laughing when he was told that the attacks on the Trade Center and the Pentagon were being blamed on “al-Qaeda”: “I laugh because I know what is there. Bin Laden has been under surveillance for years: every telephone call was monitored and al-Qaida has been penetrated by American intelligence, Pakistani intelligence, Saudi intelligence, Egyptian intelligence. They could not have kept secret an operation that required such a degree of organization and sophistication.”

    Yet, the Takfiri terrorists in Syria rally behind the black banner of “al-Qaeda.” The Takfiris include large numbers of prisoners fresh from Saudi jails. Fighting alongside the common criminals are mercenaries, fanatics, and passionate but unsophisticated young men drunk on the myth of the “magnificent 19” who supposedly brought down three World Trade Center skyscrapers with two jetliners.

    By puncturing that myth with 9/11 truth, we can ruin the “al-Qaeda” brand forever, and strike a powerful blow against Takfiri terrorism.

Leave a Reply