Fake false flag nuclear EMP shutdown triggered by cell network? You bet!
Fake false flag nuclear EMP shutdown triggered by cell network? You bet!
I am going to cover this topic of from a new angle that says the same thing in far more precise terms than what I posted yesterday.
The elite/disinfo crowd has successfully fooled the population into believing a nuclear weapon will blow out all the electronics, which is a hoax of the highest magnitude. Here is the real history of EMP and nuclear weapons.
During the early nuclear weapons testing, it was discovered that the detonations tripped circuit breakers. But in every single case, all that was needed was to reset the circuit breakers, no damage happened. A few years after this was discovered, a test was done in Nevada that blew a rotary phone switch in a small local telephone company. This was because the phone lines cover the same distances as the power lines and had enough cross section to induce a significant charge into the phone switch, (which would obviously not have a circuit breaker to protect it)
In the early 1950’s a high altitude nuclear test was done over the Pacific. This created a much broader EMP pulse, which succeeded in tripping ONE (1) and I MEAN ONE circuit breaker in Honolulu that shut the street lights off on ONE street. Additionally, ONE car starter motor failure was blamed on this (but that would be quite difficult to prove, and if EMP was a real menace they should have all been blown).
The big thing the high altitude nuclear test did, (and this was significant) was that it totally erased the shortwave radio band worldwide for over 45 minutes. This was not calculated in advance and no one has figured out in direct mathematical terms why this happened, but it did happen and from this there have been subsequent calculations that theorize that any high altitude nuclear blast is likely to black out all communications which have to traverse the ionosphere for a period of up to two hours. THAT is actually important, because a nuclear weapon could indeed be used to completely black out the American military satellite communications for long periods of time (in combat terms) and cause America to lose a war. Nuclear weapons fired in sequence (10 or so a day) at the edge of space could shut all satellite communications down.
As far as earth based electronics go however, nothing is likely to happen. There is TONS of intrinsic proof of this:
You have been told that only tubes can survive an EMP, but that is a load of bunk because many many nuclear tests were done in the transistor era, and many have been done in the microprocessor era, tests which involved ultra high yield megaton range nuclear weapons, and not one thing ever blew out anywhere during the age of microelectronics. And there is something far beyond this now – In the early microprocessor era, there were many microcircuits that did not have diode protection which is used to dissipate static electricity harmlessly. Unprotected circuits worked fine in a military setting where people are trained how to handle such electronic devices without destroying them with static electricity, but early on in the consumer computer era (80’s and early 90’s) motherboards were not protected in consumer PC’s and they got destroyed by static electricity frequently. From an electronic perspective, there is no difference between a pulse of static electricity and an EMP, (other than that because static is local and highly concentrated it is far more likely to do damage).
To answer the problem of static related failures and increase their profits via a reduction in warranty returns (and because it was cheap to do anyway) in addition to the millions of transistors in a ram chip or CPU or other microcircuits a computer has, a few hundred protection diodes per device were simply made part of the circuits at a net cost of $0 (they just had to think about doing it and put them on the die) and now consumer electronics are virtually impossible to destroy with static. Any short duration EMP that comes along (such as those produced by a nuke) will be made irrelevant by the protection diodes that are already in all the circuits to stop damage from static electricity.
The EMP hoax was never real, but it worked well to scare the public into believing there really could be a day of doom where everything went black, which is just what the “Elite” would want during a final power grab and enslavement of the people.
Oh, but I am FULL OF IT, right?
If a nuclear EMP really would blow everything out, HOW did the Power PC survive the last French nuclear test, especially when it was three years old when that happened? The same is true for China, they also detonated a 1 megaton device in 1996. but it gets much worse, because North Korea also did a nuclear test in 2006. HOW DID THE IMAC SURVIVE? The French and Chinese continued detonating large devices all the way up until 1996. That is what? 16 years after the Cray 1 super computer? How stupid is the nuclear EMP hoax? How about this:
In 1998, India set off 5 nuclear weapons, 4 regular atom bombs and 1 hydrogen bomb, and no electronics got blown anywhere. Pakistan also tested six little firecrackers the same year.
If nothing got blown out anywhere, how big is the nuclear EMP hoax? There is simply nothing out there that substantiates it in any way shape matter or form AT ALL.
I will tell you what is not a hoax, and that is Intel Corevpro technology which can destroy a CPU via a command, and it did not start with Sandy Bridge as I originally thought, it started with Centrino in 2003. WHERE WAS CENTRINO DEVELOPED? IN ISRAEL. That fits.
Centrino technology was subsequently adapted and integrated into ALL Intel processors. So it is safe to assume anything from Intel, starting in 2005 or so has auto destruct ready to go, triggered by the cell phone system. THAT would work GREAT for an EMP false flag. Interesting it is then that all U.S. cars had to have an always on 3g connection that could listen to anyone in the car in 2005 (just like we all know Onstar can do because it is an advertised feature that has been around since the 90’s) a feature now proven to be able to be hacked and control the car. But in 2005 ALL cars in America got this, advertised or not. THAT would work great for a nuclear EMP false flag, would it not? Ditto for your smart TV, your cell phone, and most likely even your MP3 player. I’d bet even your smart meter has this built in, to fake its death and cut your power.
FACT: Nuclear EMP has NEVER (despite many tests) blown out a modern electronic device.
FACT: All cars and Intel processors since 2005 have a remote kill switch that can fake death from an EMP.
If you want to prove me wrong, do not sit there and be lazy. Just start googling Chinese, French, Indian and Pakistani nuclear tests, and we all know about North Korea, which did it in the 2000’s. And what about 3/11? What about the easily proven Syrian nuclear blast, which the cameras survived filming? Nuclear EMP is not the issue anymore, it is remote activated self destruct (which probably exists in almost everything now) and public stupidity about EMP. And that gets me on a rant:
I have had others in the truth movement tell me in no uncertain terms that I had no credibility whatsoever because I said all laptops had advanced shielding and were practically immune to nuclear EMP, and they had “experts informers” who said laptops had no shielding at all. And this stands as a clear explanation as to why the nuclear EMP hoax has taken root and infected the public concience like a rampant GMO weed. Well, I went through my backups last night and found that presentation of a laptop I did after one individual called me bullshit and I have posted it below. To all who depend upon “Experts, Inside contacts, and trusted people” for what they publish, if you are not able to do it yourself, do not call those who do not need a secret source to help them sort their way through disinfo or B.S. HERE IS YOUR “TOTALLY UNSHIELDED LAPTOP”:
Click the image to view it full size, it is very detailed
When I did the picture above, I thought all nuclear testing stopped in 1970 or so, so I said a nuclear EMP might kill electronics 20 miles away in the picture based upon some very liberal math calculating the attenuation of EMP over a distance that allowed for a low attenuation rate and a lot of destruction. However, with nothing blown out during the French, Chinese, Indian, Pakistani and North Korean nuclear tests, (most of which had devices over a megaton detonated 1996 or later) I believe even 20 miles is probably a bit much, and will simply state that if the blast does not kill you, EMP will not fry your computer. If a nuclear weapon goes off close enough to take out your laptop, it won’t matter because you will be dead anyway.
Consider what the “experts” with “inside contacts” said about shielding in a laptop, and apply it to what they say about EMP. Then consider the fact that I am dead right about the laptop. Who is the real “expert”? There is not only hard modern evidence the story about EMP from a nuke “killing everything” being a hoax, there is the math where any engineer can sit down and calculate with ease that there is no way a 10 mhz or lower (usually below 1 mhz) damped wave form (which a nuclear EMP is) that has a duration of 80 microseconds or less could ever blow out something as small as a modern electronic device. Such a low frequency signal simply cannot couple with a small object, it takes a huge antenna to gather significant power at that low a frequency and the protection diodes that are in everything now would put a stop to it all anyway.
EMP from a nuke was never a big problem, and only affected things back in the 1950’s when everything was BIG. Rather than being more susceptible to EMP, the age of the transistor in fact did away with the threat. Modern nuclear tests PROVE IT.
If one dreadful day everything goes black, SOMEONE FLIPPED A SWITCH AND PLAYED THE PUBLIC A FOOL. That will be easy, because the nuclear EMP hoax is so well entrenched.
There are non nuclear EMP devices specially made for the task that can blow a laptop fairly easily. The problem? Limited range, and interference from weather. Under ideal circumstances the absolute best EMP weapon America has can fry electronics out to two miles. But if it is raining, the kill range drops to a maximum of 600 yards. The movie “The Matrix” actually got this right. They had to wait for the sentinels to get very close before their EMP weapon would kill them. EMP weapons that can actually blow modern electronics have an extremely limited range (the laws of physics clearly state this has to be the case because of the cubed function of attenuation over distance) and this was shown very well in The Matrix. These high frequency EMP weapons that actually can fry modern electronics have nothing at all in common with nuclear weapons.
I threw this in at the end here because shills will no doubt point this out, and then say I am B.S. about the nukes. The difference? Modern EMP weapons put out a frequency no lower than 2,500,000,000 hz. A nuke? If a nuke exceeds 500,000 hz it hit a high frequency for a nuke. Now count the zeros. How many orders of magnitude difference is there between the two?
Why is the difference in effective range between the two weapons types so different? BECAUSE: the super high frequency produced by a real EMP weapon gets sucked up by water vapor, which is EVERYWHERE in the air, and absent water vapor does not travel well anyway. At the opposite end of the radio spectrum, Nuclear EMP travels fairly well because it stays pretty much either below or in the AM radio frequency band. The low frequency makes it easy for it to have a long range, but the low frequency also means it cannot couple well with a small electronic device. This is why nuclear EMP has no record of blowing out anything in the digital age, even though many nuclear devices have been set off during nuclear testing in the digital age. This is also one reason why the high frequency EMP weapons were developed, but given their limited range they are only practical for military applications (busting a radar station, blowing electronics in command and control somewhere) etc.