Frau Ursula Haverbeck Declares Victory: “We can now dismiss Auschwitz!”

Frau Ursula Haverbeck Declares Victory: “We can now dismiss Auschwitz!”

Posted on 01/24/2015 by justice4germans
http://justice4germans.com/2015/01/24/frau-ursula-haverbeck-declares-victory-we-can-now-dismiss-auschwitz/

Ursula Haverbeck – The End of AuschwitzIn a new YouTube video entitled ‘Auschwitz – Media lies or the truth at last?’ (below) produced by Lady Michelle Renouf, Frau Ursula Haverbeck, speaking publicly at a conference in the German State of Saxony-Anhalt, has declared a victory for Germans in “dispensing with Auschwitz as the ‘scene of the crime’ of the holocaust.” She said “According to official statements, Auschwitz is no longer considered the scene of the most wicked crime in history – the alleged murder of six million Jews. So the question arises: where did this crime take place? Where is the scene of the German’s crime? This is the burning question of the six million. Where are they?”

“Over a period of five years”, says Frau Haverbeck, “I have challenged in writing, various German authorities, including judges, the chamber of lawyers, German-Jewish organizations and the ministers of the various German states, to ‘define the scene of the crime’. If not at Auschwitz, then where did it happen?” The ‘authorities, she contends, must demonstrate where it happened, and she feels that they have had more than ample time, but have not done so. Which begs the question: “why not?”. Frau Haverbeck says “they have failed to reply, because they have no answer! And if they have no answer, then I must conclude that there is no evidence to substantiate the official narrative concerning the murder of six million Jews!”

“We can now dismiss Auschwitz!” concludes Frau Haverbeck. “And I say this publicly here in the state of Saxony-Anhalt. Seventy years after the war, it is high time that we [Germans] accept our rights, as publicly proclaimed by European leaders, that we have Freedom of the Press, Freedom of Opinion, and the Freedom to Demonstrate. These freedoms, according to those leaders, are the most sacred rights enjoyed by citizens in a democracy. I, therefore, claim them for myself. Thank you!”

Frau Haverbeck has organized a public conference to take place on January 31st, 2015, in Saxony-Anhalt on the topic of “The Liberation of Auschwitz” and has invited the Minister of the Interior to attend. As we previously reported, in December of 2014, Frau Haverbeck laid criminal charges against the Central Council of Jews in Germany for False Prosecutions.

In the introduction to this video, Richard Edmonds also challenged Russian President Vladimir Putin to re-investigate the lies of the Soviet Commission in 1945, which formed the basis of the deceitful postwar histories of both the Katyn Massacre and the Auschwitz camp.

We have, in numerous previous posts, also challenged Mr. Putin to open all of the former Soviet war archives and to officially come clean about the lies concerning World War II, particularly relating to the alleged “unprovoked attack by Hitler on the Soviet Union” which is demonstrably false, according to many notable historians, including several Russians, as well as, documents in the German archives and in the private archives of Marshall Mannerheim of Finland. But also, regarding the heinous crimes committed against Germans in the final months of the war, as well is in the aftermath, including the forged evidence presented at the Nuremberg trials, and the use of torture to induce confessions.

This video was published January 24th, 2015 with English subs:


LINK

Where are the photos that were taken by the Soviets during the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp?

The Soviet Army reached Auschwitz on 27th January 1945. On that day many pictures were taken of those approximately 7,500 inmates whoauschwitz real2 were left behind. These photographs, however, are almost never shown to the general public; the relatively well-fed people do not fit so well into the popular image of “extermination camp” Auschwitz.

One also wonders why the Soviets did not take a single photo of that gas chamber, which through decades has been presented to millions of tourists as the place where millions of Jews had been gassed.

Instead, Pravda reported six days after the liberation of Auschwitz of mass killings on electric conveyors and cremations in blast furnaces (see footnote 3) but said not a word about Zyklon B, the main weapon of the alleged Holocaust.

British IMT Prosecutor Sir Hartley Shawcross, in a speech on 16th March 1984 expressed the following, belated insight into Hitler’s alleged war intentions:

“Step by step I am more and more of the conviction that the aims of Communism in Europe are sinister. I indicted the Nazis at Nuremberg. Together with my Russian colleagues I condemned Nazi aggression and the Nazi terror. (But) Hitler and the German people did not want war! Following our policy of balance of power and inspired by “Americans” [31] around Roosevelt, we declared war on Germany in order to destroy it. We have not responded to the numerous pleas of Hitler for peace. Now we have to realize that Hitler was right. Instead of a cooperative Germany, which he had offered us, stands the huge imperialist power of the Soviets. I feel ashamed and humiliated to have to see how the same goals, which we assumed Hitler had, are being pursued under a different name, and the same tactic is being used without restrain.”[32]

SOURCE: https://shoabloger.wordpress.com/texts/the-forbidden-truth-2/

As Prof. Robert Faurisson has previously pointed out “The Nuremberg judges never visited Auschwitz. And they even never asked for a forensic report. They took judicial notice of Soviet document USSR-008 stating that 4,000,000 died at Auschwitz camp. In 1995, it was decided by the camp’s authorities that 1,500.000 was the real figure. Later on, a plaque in the camp indicated 1,300.000. [And since lowered again]. He adds:

The beginning of Article 19 of the Charter of the International Military Tribunal (IMT) states: “The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence …”

The beginning of Article 21 says : “The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof …”

The real organizer, responsible for the IMT, was Robert H. Jackson, US Attorney General, who said on 26 July 1946: “This Tribunal represents a continuation of the war efforts of the Allied Nations” (IMT, vol. XIX, p. 398).

At the IMT it was forbidden to dispute the content of documents such as USSR-008; one had to take judicial notice thereof.”

In the Federal Republic of Germany, “holocaust denial” is illegal and the courts there have always maintained that the “holocaust” is a “fact of common knowledge”, that it is “obvious” and cannot be called into question, under pain of fines and lengthy terms of imprisonment. To present contrary evidence in ones own defence is also illegal. Well, “obviously” such a law, combined with the silence and complicity of German leaders in enforcing such a law proves a continuation of the Allied Nuremberg process, and that Germany is still under occupation, with no independent government or judiciary. It is, undeniably, “a continuation of the war efforts of the Allied nations”. Not a single one of the Allied nations which declared war against the German Reich has ever offered a peace treaty. Nor for that matter has “Judea” which declared war on Germany on March 24th, 1933.

WAHRHEIT MACHT FREI!

We Germans are still awaiting our “liberation”. The truth shall set us free, and that can be the ONLY reason for criminalizing it!

***

Many thanks to Frau Ursula Haverbeck for her diligence, courage and honour on behalf of all Germans. Thanks to Lady Michelle and Richard Edmonds for this video and their efforts, and to Prof. Faurisson for informing us of it, as well as, for his many years of struggle for the truth on behalf of our people.

As always, thoughtful comments are welcome, but please do not abuse the privilege with long-winded personal diatribes, to express hatred or violence, nor to promote agendas which this author does not subscribe to. Please stay on topic and refrain from profanities. Thank you.

One comment

  • theunhivedmind

    86 Year Old German Woman lays charges against the Central Council of the Jews in Germany

    Posted on 12/17/2014 by justice4germans
    http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/17/86-year-old-german-woman-lays-charges-against-the-central-council-of-the-jews-in-germany/

    Ursula HaverbeckHere is a story you won’t hear in the “mainstream media” nor the alternative, unless it is first put through the wash and spin cycle. Thus, I will do my best to simply translate and present this important and very newsworthy story to the world for consideration as provided by the original author, whom I shall introduce, as well as provide some context for her perspective, as well as my own.

    Frau Ursula Haverbeck, born in 1928, is an 86 year old survivor of the genocidal Allied terror bombing, the Russian onslaught of rape and pillage on Germany’s Eastern frontier, the anti-German pogroms and expulsions, and the post-war Morgenthau Plan of mass starvation perpetrated against Germany, the enslavement and mass murder of surrendered German soldiers as well as, of the post-war cultural genocide of the German nation by the criminal victors.

    Many today still live in “denial” of these obvious and provable crimes, but no law prevents anyone from voicing their denial, so no one has ever been jailed for denying these facts. Nor is any notion of “collective guilt and punishment” forced upon the citizens of the nations which perpetrated these monstrous “war crimes” and “crimes against humanity”. The peoples of the Allied nations have not been divided, and had their land, culture and heritage stolen. Nor have they been forced to pay reparations to the Germans for this “Unholicaust”. No one has ever been jailed for spreading “false news” and “inciting hatred” toward the German people, though it is committed daily in the mass media; in books, films, TV shows, newspaper articles, schools, and in everyday average conversation amongst people everywhere.

    Frau Haverbeck is a very learned, lucid and articulate lady, who is in good physical and mental health. She holds several university degrees, including in the field of Education. She, along with her late husband (a professor and former Eastern Front soldier) were both, in past years, very involved with environmental concerns in Germany, and were activists for the preservation of the German language and culture.

    On November 20th, 2014, Frau Haverbeck made history by laying criminal charges against the Central Council of the Jews in Germany, under S. 344 of German Penal Code with “False Prosecutions” perpetrated against innocent Germans concerning their “denial of the holocaust” (TM). The crime of False Prosecution is punishable with up to 10 years imprisonment.

    In this recent video entitled “The Biggest Problem of Our Time”, she cited the ever diminishing publicly acknowledged numbers of Jews who died at Auschwitz, as already acknowledged by official sources, and which can also be read by all on the plaque outside the former Auschwitz camp.


    LINK

    She referred to an article to this effect in the nationally published magazine “Der Spiegel” in 2002. Frau Haverbeck also stated that original NS German documents concerning the exact orders pertaining to the duties at Auschwitz which had been seized by the Soviet Union after the war, were now in possession of the mainstream “Institut für Zeitgeschicht” (Institute for History), and also available to the public for a fee of €124.00 since 2000.

    Frau Haverbeck says that “these documents indicate very clearly, in full detail, that the Auschwitz camp was not an ‘Extermination Camp’, but rather a ‘labour camp’ for the defence industry, and moreover, that those in charge of its operation were under orders to maintain the health of the prisoners to the best of their ability for the purposes of production, which was essential for the continuing war effort”. She adds, “that is what those who worked there and have been accused of war crimes have always maintained!”

    “Surely by now” Frau Haverbeck says “an official revision which encompasses these facts should have taken place and that all judgments made against so-called ‘deniers’ should have been overturned, as the evidence is available which supports their position, but nothing of the sort has happened. Many are still sitting in jail to this day. This puts the onus back on the accusers who continue to claim that 6 Million Jews were exterminated, to show us where the physical evidence is that supports their claim. Where are they?”

    Frau Haverbeck stated that “I and others have petitioned every possible government department and branch of justice and have provided them with these documents, and yet nothing has happened. There has been no reply! The reason for that must be that they have no response as they have no evidence, as there was no holocaust”.

    “If this was an indeed such an ‘open and shut case’ that is irrefutable, as the courts have ruled over and over again, and which they never tire of telling us, their case cannot rest upon any so-called ‘secret order’ . And for them to now have to acknowledge a drastically reduced number of victims is for them also not possible, given the alleged singularity of this event, as the one and the only, and the biggest and most heinous crime ever committed. Then let us consider and compare this with the ‘Rheinwiesenlager’ (Eisenhower’s Death Camps), Dresden, Hiroshima, and horrors experienced by the many millions of German expellees and refugees from the East!”

    Frau Haverbeck then goes on to state that “in statements made at Nuremberg, no one testified to the presence of any gas chambers, and that confessions, particularly those of Rudolf Höss, are now well known to have been extracted through unimaginable, excruciating torture, to which anyone would have confessed to the mass murder of millions. No testimony, received by such means, as legal experts know, can be given consideration. Why is it that there should even be such a law as S. 130 that should deny us the ability to question this? And how is it that the entire body of defence testimony and uncountable volume of physical evidence which they tried to provide was completely ignored or destroyed? Such could only have proved to have been incriminating if something sinister had actually taken place. Obviously, they (the prosecutors) could prove nothing, and so these witnesses and their evidence had to disappear.”

    She goes on to question how this is possible in Germany for the authorities to ignore, and asks whose interests these “authorities” and “academics” etc truly serve? (This roughly the first 10 minutes of the 19 minute long video. I’ll leave it there in the interest of time and length.)

    In a statement posted on her website, Frau Haverbeck writes:

    “After weeks of reading on the internet that ‘there was no Holocaust’ all processes in which critical-thinking citizens convicted of Holocaust denial under section 130, paragraph 3 of the Criminal Code must now be re-opened .

    These citizens have committed no other crime other than that they came to the same conclusions earlier, that there may not have been any such “holocaust”, because of their own due diligence and scientific knowledge.

    All interested parties should immediately consult the competent courts in order to make them now aware of this new evidence. Then, contact their respective lawyers to clarify as to how to proceed.

    It was outrageous what took place after the reduction of the number of victims of Auschwitz, which was officially announced to the public, with no explanation, nor apology for giving false information. Whereas, the ‘Spiegel’ Editor, who wrote the same thing in an essay based upon the new archival discoveries, etc., has gone unpunished.

    Even more serious and incompatible with the rule of law was the simultaneous arrest and jailing of the chemist Germar Rudolf. He had, with his chemistry expertise and his scientific investigations into Zyklon B as a potential gassing agent, come to the conclusion that the holocaust, as hitherto described, could not have happened at Auschwitz.

    Now this is unacceptable: on the one side, the documents of the Commandant of Auschwitz show that this was a labor camp for the defence industry and not an extermination camp, yet the Ludwigsburg Central Office for prosecution of ‘National Socialist crimes’ has indicted about thirty men, now over ninety years old, on the charge that they had been involved an the extermination camp at Auschwitz, and in the murder of hundreds of thousands of people.

    If the German citizen is still the supreme sovereign under the Basic Law in this Federal Republic of Germany, then each of us has a responsibility for the truth, and a right to expect that justice be done. This is the basic responsibility of every citizen. It is, therefore, also the duty of each to also work towards the restoration of law and justice.”

    Approx. 2,000 Germans are charged each year in Germany under S.130 of Penal Code for “Holocaust Denial” which is punishable with up to 5 years imprisonment and fines, and also has social penalties, as those convicted find themselves unable to work and shut out of organizations, etc. In the media they are demonized and vilified as “Neo-Nazis” and “right-wing extremists”. The term “Nazi” is, as I have previously reported, a pejorative term created by the enemies of National Socialism long before Hitler ever came to power, and it is still wielded as a weapon to this day, in Germany and elsewhere, to stifle dissent and discussion, and to incite hatred.

    Frau Haverbeck, herself, has been labelled as such and has previously been charged and convicted as a “Holocaust denier” and also with “Volksverhetzung” (inciting hatred) for her efforts to speak out on behalf of the German people who to do this day are burdened with the alleged guilt of starting the war, of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the systematic mass murder of the European Jews.

    Questioning any of this in “liberated” Germany is punishable with imprisonment. Presenting evidence to the contrary is not allowed. It is also forbidden in Canada and many European nations. Here is just a partial list of others (Germans and non-Germans) who have been tried, convicted, stalked, harassed and violently attacked for sharing their views and for presenting factual evidence contrary to the official and legally enforced narrative.

    Quotes from Frau Havenbeck:

    „Wir leben gar nicht in einer echten Demokratie, was man schon daran erkennen kann, daß alle Angst haben. Die Herrscher haben vor dem Volk Angst, deshalb gibt es Maulkorbgesetze, und das Volk hat vor den Regierenden Angst, deshalb wagt es nicht zu sagen, was es denkt.“ ~ Ursula Haverbeck vor dem Landgericht Dortmund, 11. Juni 2007

    Translation: “We do not live a real democracy, which one can easily see when everyone lives in fear. The Controllers are afraid of the people, and for this reason, they have made “muzzle laws”, and so the people live in fear of those who rule over them. Therefore. the people do not dare to speak their minds.” ~ Ursula Havenbeck, before the State Court in Dortmund, 11th June, 2007

    „Vaterland und Muttersprache bilden die Grundlage jeder völkischen Entwicklung. […] Ein Sklave, der seine Ketten nicht spürt, sehnt sich niemals nach der Freiheit.“ ~ Ursula Haverbeck als Referentin im NPD-Bürgerzentrum, März 2010

    Translation: “Fatherland and Mother Tongue are the basis for any folkish (German cultural) development. […] A slave who does not realize he is in chains will never seek to free himself” ~ Ursula Havenbeck, as guest speaker of the NPD-Citizen Centre, March 2010.

    Ursula Haverbeck – Warrior for Trtuh and Justice

    Fighter for the Truth

    A plaque created for her by friends and supporters in GermanyUrsula Haverbeck AwardTranslation: “Ursula Haverbeck is today 85, and works tirelessly for her homeland. In recognition of her loyalty and conscientious fulfillment of her duty for the fatherland, is this certificate presented in lasting recognition. In Lügde, on the 9th of November, 2013.

    ursula-haverbeck.info

Leave a Reply