HAARP technology – When the Evil play GOD

HAARP technology – When the Evil play GOD

April 26 2014
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com

This update has replaced the original Haarp report.Permalink here; http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/haarp.html

I am well aware that Haarp proper has its limits, and cite the real source I believe is used in this report. Nowadays the word HAARP is like the word Kleenex.

If you are a fence sitter with regard to Chem trails and weather modification, that is understandable because “no one” has come up with “hard proof” that this is going on. But today ought to be the day that changes, because I have cold hard proof that HAARP technology is exactly what people say it is along with a precise technical explanation for how Haarp technology works and this will post today.

DO NOT MISS THE NASA REPORT, WHICH PROVES HAARP TECHNOLOGY DID KATRINA, which was part of the original post and is already linked in here.

Understanding the technical side of Haarp

It is a cold hard fact that even if the entire electrical grid output was used for weather modification, there would be insufficient power available to do much of anything. The distances are too wide, volumes too huge, and locations in relation to a transmitter seldom ideal. Yet weather modification is a reality. How? This article explains how it can be done, from a scientific perspective, and also provides direct evidence from Nasa that Haarp intensified hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Emily.

Jim Stone, Freelace Journalist, Feb 5 2012

Most everyone has heard that silicon is a semiconductor. A semiconductor only permits current flow when the conditions are correct.

In a typical silicon semiconductor, it’s current flow characteristics are determined by the addition of doping agents – these are mixed with the silicon and become part of it’s molecular matrix during the manufacturing process. The two most common doping agents are arsenic and boron.

Doping agents cause the silicon to have an excess number of electrons in the P doped regions, and a deficiency of electrons in the N doped regions. A small electronic charge applied to the junction between the N and P regions will cause a cascade effect of a much greater magnitude if a power supply voltage is applied to one side of the piece of silicon, and a load is applied on the other side. That is what makes a transistor, the heart of a basic amplifier.

How HAARP works, and a possible real reason why there are “chem trails”

Most people do not realize this, but common air – the air we all breathe, is also a semiconductor, and it can be made to behave just like a piece of silicon if the right doping agents are added to it.

If you wish to modify the electrical characteristics of the atmosphere, you need to use an aircraft to disperse the doping agents at a high altitude. If you then take a pair of huge transmitters, such as haarp, and transmit a frequency to a specific region which is timed to phase cancel against the opposing transmitter the frequencies they transmit will vanish and leave a standing DC bias voltage in the atmosphere at the selected region.

This voltage is the electrical equivalent of the electronic charge applied between the N and P regions of a silicon transistor. The chem trails are the doping agent, and the ionosphere is the power supply.

A flow of current is then is triggered from the ionosphere to the earth below. Because the ionosphere has virtually endless power to give, it is possible to take a transmitter pair with a radiated power of only a couple of billion watts, and use it to trigger a cascade of trillions of watts. That is enough to heat the atmosphere, and trigger a change of climate, storms, ect. It is very important to make sure you do not exceed certain limits, or “clip” the atmosphere, or you will cause a lightning bolt of a sort not ever witnessed. But if kept below certain thresholds, a great amount of atmospheric heating can be caused and no one on the ground would ever notice a thing.

This of course would cause very odd electrical readings in the atmosphere. So someone should have been able to detect this, right? Nasa did. They noticed several hurricanes, including Katrina, were not electrically normal. These were the only 3 hurricanes to ever be that way. This could be done using the method illustrated below.

The following illustration is a drawing of how a Haarp type system could be set up to work.

haarptypesystem

Considering the precision modern weather modification systems have, giant installations such as HAARP can’t be doing it all

Now onto WHY ON EARTH American cell towers have so much juice going to them.

What if thousands of cell towers with over 50,000 watts each were used rather than a pair of big Haarp arrays? Multiple signal source locations would allow the drawing of patterns, patterns which many people have noticed in weather radar

How much is 50,000 watts, compared to what is really needed for cell service?

In America, computer wifi is limited to 20 milliwatts transmit power and often even with that tiny amount you can connect from hundreds of feet away with no special antennas or hardware. Your cell phone can transmit 300 milliwatts. That’s well over 10 times the power of wifi, and the range of your cell phone is that much better. All that is needed to make a great cellular node is a 10 watt transmitter (to make sure it gets real good penetration into the surrounding buildings,) and a receiver that is more sensitive than the one in your cell phone because you are talking back with a lot less than 10 watts.

10 watts is 500 times as strong as your wireless N router that comes in perfect everywhere. A lucky neighbor might snag your unsecured router with only 20 milliwatts of output from over a block away with just a cheap netbook. Why then, since 10 watts will clearly do the job, are there these ENORMOUS out in the open giant goose invading “cell towers” in America that are obviously capable of pumping many thousands of watts?

It’s because the cell towers in America have a totally different purpose than stated. Sure, the tower does indeed accomplish the job of supporting cell phone service, but it is not needed at all for that purpose. They are there to hide something clandestine right in the great wide open.

A reader sent the following:

“My company also erected many cell towers, and I always wondered why they had us bring so much electrical power to these cell towers.”

He NAILED IT. As a technical type, I paid attention to the cell towers, and noticed that they always seem to have a 400KVA or bigger transformer feeding them (I was never able to get close enough to look at the data plate but they were obviously way too large). 400KVA is approximately 400,000 watts. And I never really thought about it, why on earth they always got fed so much juice. Sometimes you just need to wake up and start thinking. Mexico confirms this – many cell towers are obviously low powered, with thin wires and tiny tower mounted amplifiers. A perfectly functional node can be fed less juice than needed by an average laptop and run on a small solar panel. These are common in Mexico.

Another comment came in stating that American cell towers in fact only get anywhere from twenty thousand to sixty thousand watts, complete with verified documentation that that is “all it is”. Ok, Fine then. WLS AM radio in Chicago which is well known as the GIANT clear channel monster in America broadcasts through the night with 50,000 watts, and with a good radio you can hear it anywhere in the world when conditions are right. To sometimes pump even more than that into a single American neighborhood via the local tower which is serving only a two mile area is far beyond suspicious, It is case proven. Those cell towers ARE NOT WHAT WE HAVE BEEN TOLD and I am certain that even 60,000 watts would be a conservative estimate for many of them.

Why pump so many watts?

The antenna arrays on the cell towers are highly directional. That’s obvious. So since the signal from them is confined to a zone, rather than going out omnidirectionally, whatever is in that zone will get extremely high R.F. levels. Maybe you need that much for mind control, but I seriously doubt it. With such an ability to confine the signal to within a zone, I would expect a mind control beam to not need more than a couple thousand watts. Where is the rest of that power going?

My guess, is Japan, Hurricane Katrina, or Chiapas Mexico. Whatever earthquake or disaster “they” need to accomplish a political objective. And there is something you need to know about radio wave propagation – it can be steered. So just because a cell tower appears to only be able place all it’s RF output within a confined zone, it does not mean that signal cannot be diverted and sent elsewhere. This is because a neighboring cell tower can be synchronized in such a way that it steers the output from surrounding towers to a new remote area. And that is how modern Haarp technology works, BET ON IT.

American cell towers then, I believe in this order, have multiple purposes. The first is EMF mind control. Ever wonder why on some mornings EVERYONE seems to be happy, and on others EVERYONE seems to be grouchy? People don’t just naturally fall into a mold like that, yet you see it all the time. And you never used to. This is a new phenomenon. Back in the 70’s and 80’s moods were totally random. Not anymore. There are happy days when everyone is happy, and grouchy days and indifferent days. If you have not noticed this, start paying attention. People’s lives are random, and there should be absolutely no reason for their moods to all be similar for any reason other than outside manipulation.

The second purpose is an occasional one – I believe that occasionally the towers will be switched up to full output to eat a nuclear reactor in Japan via a phony earthquake scenario, or to make good and sure a hurricane is useful for a social experiment in New Orleans. But you cannot have them humming away at full output all the time without it becoming obvious, so the ability is likely saved for special occasions. Furthermore, with as many as there are around, it probably does not take more than a few percent of them at any one time to pull off something big. And this is exactly why, as my reader also stated, “Later, the Army Corps of Engineers would install frequency amplifiers connected with HXXrp. I believe they can control the weather.” Why, pray tell, would the Corps of Engineers show up and install something in a “civilian” cell tower? Think about that. We all know the “elite” can trigger earthquakes. We all know they can tweak the weather. The question is then, since there is no GIANT UFO in the sky doing it, where is their system located?

Geometric patterns prove it has to be the Cell towers doing it.

If you set up two transmitters, their phase collision zone will happen in a straight line. But as my reader from Brazil has stated, they had a perfectly square shaped drought area. And if you look at the pictures of the haarp caused drought in California, that pattern happened along two straight lines that formed an L. And then there are circles and other patterns people have reported, and this means that the effect is not being accomplished with two transmitters, it has to be using multiple transmitters creating multiple collision zones to start drawing shapes. THAT is where the cell towers come into play.

weatherwest3

The more signal sources you have to create a zone, the more patterns and shapes you can make, with each transmitter pair in whatever Haarp grid you fire up being responsible for their own little area. Let’s say your little grid uses a thousand cell towers in the Houston area – this would allow 500 different points, each getting at least 100,000 watts of bias current each, with a total of 50 million watts to trigger a bigger cascade from the ionosphere. This would be the reason for all the shapes people see, true, there are radar errors that can cause patterns to appear as many meteorologists will state but that won’t cause a consitent drought causing L shaped high front off the coast of California to appear and stay put for months on end.

It is very easy to confirm that cell towers have cell service as a totally secondary purpose, just walk up to one and see how much power it is getting fed. If there is any more there than 100 watts for amplifiers, another 200 or so for lights and I’ll give them another 500 to play with just in case there is something like a computer and monitor in a little building at the tower base, if there is more than that present something is seriously amiss. Having large liquid cooled transformers at every tower is a dead giveaway, the towers are NOT what we have been told they are.

I believe what we are witnessing now – the horrible tornados and floods, is also the result of weather modifications. I believe they want to bring untold disaster to this nation, to cause extreme trouble before ushering in an ID system, a new currency, and global governance.

Direct environmental effects can be observed when Haarp type systems are in use if you get lucky

Mysterious booms, powerful auroras, you can see and hear it all if there is a break in the clouds, or booms if they push the system too hard. This is the reason for all the mysterious booms peole are hearing around the country now, google that if you have not heard about it. And the volcanic eruption to the left I believe was a threat against the nation of Japan. Such pictures are common now. But think back to when you were a kid. We had cameras and volcanoes then. Why did we never have pictures like this in National Geographic in the 60´s 70´s 80´s and 90´s? HMMMMM??? That’s not special effects, that really happened and is obvious Haarp in action. To see more, like it CLICK HERE the elite are OBVIOUSLY now making MANY THREATS.

AND THEY CAN, because in the words of Defense secretary William Cohen himself, dated all the way back to 1996, Cohen himself stated:

“Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.

So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that’s why this is so important.”

Cohen himself said this in a Pentagon press briefing in 1996. THAT means all this technology is real. Cell towers and Haarp emit radio waves, which are just another name for electromagnetic waves. WAKE UP PEOPLE, THERE IS NO ROOM FOR DOUBT – regardless of the systems used, this warfare is a reality and Cohen’s statement proves it. If you have any friends who are doubters, show them this page. Don’t send it via mail which will only be censored, show them directly on their own computers.

I have observed weather modification myself.
In Vancouver BC in the winter of 2007, I personally watched the sky during extremely odd weather at night, and through a hole in the clouds which occurred between violent downpours saw an aurora borealis stepping up and down in discrete steps as if being digitally switched between various intensities. I have spent plenty of time observing real auroras, and this one obviously had a synthetic origin. It was extremely bright, the brightest I have ever seen by far, and auroras do not just step up and down in intensity like that. They fade up and down. I even wondered why it was in such large steps, with modern technologies it would not need to be. Perhaps they don’t care about how obvious it is, or perhaps they thought the clouds were solid enough to hide it.

I knew when I saw this, in concert with clouds that appeared to be formed along grid lines in symmetrical patterns that the weather in that particular case had to be man made.

As usual, if anyone can point out inaccuracies in this article, please e-mail me with recommended changes; Weather modification is so classified that details are sparse and you sometimes just have to guess. I hope I connected a few dots here.

9 comments

  • theunhivedmind

    DoD News Briefing: Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen

    Presenter: Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen
    April 28, 1997 8:45 AM EDT
    http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=674

    Cohen’s keynote address at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy at the Georgia Center, Mahler Auditorium, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga. The event is part of the Sam Nunn Policy Forum being hosted by the University of Georgia. Secretary Cohen is joined by Sen. Sam Nunn and Sen. Richard G. Lugar.]

    Secretary Cohen: Senator Nunn, thank you very much. As Senator Nunn has indicated, he and I have worked for many years together, along with Senator Lugar. The two of these gentlemen I feel are perhaps the most courageous and visionary to have served in the Senate. They were largely responsible, of course, for adopting the so-called Nunn/Lugar legislation.

    I’ll comment on that later during the course of the morning, but I’ve had occasion to meet with a number of Russian counterparts, and as we go through various translations of the communications that we’re having, the two words they are able to articulate very clearly, they say ‘Nunn/Lugar, Nunn/Lugar. So they know exactly what that means, and that means the Cooperative Thre’at Reduction Act that these two gentlemen were indispensable in shepherding through the United States Congress.

    It was Nunn/Lugar I that dealt with the reduction of nuclear weapons between the United States and the Soviet Union in terms of trying to come to grips with how we helped the Russians dismantle hundreds of their nuclear weapons, and also helped them with their destruction of chemical weapons. But they, of course, have looked beyond simply that particular relationship, which is very important, but also looking to the future that we face as far as the rise of terrorism — both international and domestic; and finding ways in which the Department of Defense can become involved in helping local states and local agencies to deal with the threat of terrorism which is quite likely to increase in the coming years.

    It’s a pleasure for me to be here. Both Senator Nunn and Senator Lugar are close friends and I look forward to, I think, a very productive seminar. Once again demonstrating that although Senator Nunn has left public service in the Senate, he has not left public service as far as the nation is concerned.

    It’s a pleasure for me to be here, Sam.

    Senator Nunn: Thank you very much, Bill.

    . ..Let me ask if there are any questions for Secretary of Defense Cohen.

    Q: The dual containment policy in Iran and Iraq, do you think that’s conducive to regional stability in that region? And do you think can cause further terrorism in the United States? That type of containment policy in the Middle East.

    A: I think Secretary Albright articulated our policy as far as dealing with Iraq, that it’s clear that we have been unable to strike any kind of a productive relationship with Saddam Hussein, and as soon as Saddam Hussein is no longer the head of that government, that there’s new regime that follows him, that we will look forward to finding ways in which we could engage them in a much more productive fashion, particularly after they comply with all of the UN sanctions. There’s an eagerness on our part to do that. But I think as long as he remains in office as the head of that state, it’s unlikely that we could have anything but the current policy in place, with very little prospects for relief.

    With respect to Iran, I think Iran continues to present a long term threat to the region. They are acquiring and have acquired weapons of mass destruction, substantial levels of chemicals and we believe biological weapons as well. They have made an effort to acquire nuclear capability. So I think that our policy of dual containment is the right one, and we are going to encourage our allies to support that one.

    Q: What does it mean that Clinton (inaudible) proliferation?

    A: To the extent that we see the level of communication available today, the Internet and other types of interwoven communicative skills and abilities, we’re going to see information continue to spread as to how these weapons can be, in fact, manufactured in a home-grown laboratory, as such. So it’s a serious problem as far as living in the information age that people who are acquiring this kind of information will not act responsibly, but rather act in a terrorist type of fashion.

    We’ve seen by way of example of the World Trade Center the international aspects of international terrorism coming to our home territory. We’ve also seen domestic terrorism with the Oklahoma bombing. So it’s a real threat that’s here today. It’s likely to intensify in the years to come as more and more groups have access to this kind of information and the ability to produce them.

    Q: How prepared is the U.S. Government to deal with (inaudible)?

    A: I think we have to really intensify our efforts. That’s the reason for the Nunn/Lugar II program. That’s the reason why it’s a local responsibility, as such, but the Department of Defense is going to be taking the lead as far as supervising the interagency working groups, and to make the assessments as to what needs to be done. So we’re going to identify those 120 cities and work with them very closely to make sure that they can prepare themselves for what is likely to be a threat well into the future.

    Q: Let me ask you specifically about last week’s scare here in Washington, and what we might have learned from how prepared we are to deal with that (inaudible), at B’nai Brith.

    A: Well, it points out the nature of the threat. It turned out to be a false threat under the circumstances. But as we’ve learned in the intelligence community, we had something called — and we have James Woolsey here to perhaps even address this question about phantom moles. The mere fear that there is a mole within an agency can set off a chain reaction and a hunt for that particular mole which can paralyze the agency for weeks and months and years even, in a search. The same thing is true about just the false scare of a threat of using some kind of a chemical weapon or a biological one. There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.

    So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that’s why this is so important.

    Q: What is response to (inaudible)?

    A: We hope we will have access to the defector. In fact I was recently in South Korea and talked with various officials in South Korea. As soon as they complete their own interrogation of this defector, we will have access to that individual. But much of what he has said to date is reflected in the writings that he prepared last year. This is prior to his defection. One would not expect a potential defector to be writing about anything other than what the official doctrine or dogma is of the North Korean government at that time. He is saying essentially what we have known for a long, long time. Namely, that North Korea poses a very serious threat against South Korea, and potentially even Japan, by virtue of having the fourth largest army in the world, by having 600,000 or more troops poised within 100 kilometers of Seoul, of possessing many SCUD missiles, also the potential of chemically armed warheads, the attempt to acquire nuclear weapons. So we know they have this potential, and the question really is going to be what’s in their hearts and minds at this point? Do they intend to try to launch such an attack in the immediate, foreseeable future? That we can only speculate about, but that’s the reason why we are so well prepared to defend against such an attack to deter it; and to send a message that it would be absolutely an act of suicide for the North Koreans to launch an attack. They could do great damage in the short run, but they would be devastated in response. So we’re hoping we can find ways to bring them to the bargaining table — the Party of Four Talks — and see if we can’t put them on a path toward peace instead of threatening any kind of devastating attack upon the South.

    Q: . ..a little bit about the situation in (inaudible)?

    A: I really don’t have much more information than has been in the press at this point. The Department has not been called upon to act in this regard just yet, so I’m not at liberty to give you any more information than you already have.

    Q: . ..the Administration’s plans to expand NATO to more European countries. Is there a terrorism element? Or will expanding NATO help you in any way in terms of (inaudible)? Or is it really unrelated?

    A: I think the two are unrelated. There is a legitimate debate that will take place in terms of the pace of enlargement or whether there should be enlargement. Secretary Albright and I testified last week before the Senate Armed Services Committee, and it was a very, I think, productive debate. It’s something that Senator Nunn, I think, feels very strongly about as well. The two of us, I think, found ourselves on the Senate Floor last year saying it was time for the American people to start debating this issue. So it’s very important and there will be legitimate differences of opinion, but it’s important that we bring this to the Senate for full debate and disclosure, and bring it to the American people. But I doubt if it’s related to the spread of terrorism whatsoever.

    Senator Nunn: Thank you very much.

  • theunhivedmind

    Electric Hurricanes

    Three of the most powerful hurricanes of 2005 were filled with mysterious lightning.

    http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2006/09jan_electrichurricanes/

    MP3 Audio; Right click, save as..

    January 9, 2006: The boom of thunder and crackle of lightning generally mean one thing: a storm is coming. Curiously, though, the biggest storms of all, hurricanes, are notoriously lacking in lightning. Hurricanes blow, they rain, they flood, but seldom do they crackle.

    Surprise: During the record-setting hurricane season of 2005 three of the most powerful storms–Rita, Katrina, and Emily–did have lightning, lots of it. And researchers would like to know why.

    Richard Blakeslee of the Global Hydrology and Climate Center (GHCC) in Huntsville, Alabama, was one of a team of scientists who explored Hurricane Emily using NASA’s ER-2 aircraft, a research version of the famous U-2 spy plane. Flying high above the storm, they noted frequent lightning in the cylindrical wall of clouds surrounding the hurricane’s eye. Both cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-ground lightning were present, “a few flashes per minute,” says Blakeslee.


    Above: The eye of Hurricane Emily photographed from the International Space Station. [More]

    “Generally there’s not a lot of lightning in the eye-wall region,” he says. “So when people see lightning there, they perk up — they say, okay, something’s happening.”

    Sign up for EXPRESS SCIENCE NEWS delivery

    Indeed, the electric fields above Emily were among the strongest ever measured by the aircraft’s sensors over any storm. “We observed steady fields in excess of 8 kilovolts per meter,” says Blakeslee. “That is huge–comparable to the strongest fields we would expect to find over a large land-based ‘mesoscale’ thunderstorm.”

    The flight over Emily was part of a 30-day science data-gathering campaign in July 2005 organized and sponsored by NASA headquarters to improve scientists’ understanding of hurricanes. Blakeslee and others from NASA, NOAA and 10 U.S. universities traveled to Costa Rica for the campaign, which is called “Tropical Cloud Systems and Processes.” From the international airport near San Jose, the capital of Costa Rica, they could fly the ER-2 to storms in both the Caribbean and the eastern Pacific Ocean. They combined ER-2 data with data from satellites and ground-based sensors to get a comprehensive view of each storm.

    Rita and Katrina were not part of the campaign. Lightning in those storms was detected by means of long-distance sensors on the ground, not the ER-2, so less is known about their electric fields.


    Above: The ER-2 en route to a hurricane. [More]

    Nevertheless, it is possible to note some similarities: (1) all three storms were powerful: Emily was a Category 4 storm, Rita and Katrina were Category 5; (2) all three were over water when their lightning was detected; and (3) in each case, the lightning was located around the eye-wall.

    What does it all mean? The answer could teach scientists something new about the inner workings of hurricanes.
    Actually, says Blakeslee, the reason most hurricanes don’t have lightning is understood. “They’re missing a key ingredient: vertical winds.”

    Within thunderclouds, vertical winds cause ice crystals and water droplets (called “hydrometeors”) to bump together. This “rubbing” causes the hydrometeors to become charged. Think of rubbing your socked feet across wool carpet–zap! It’s the same principle. For reasons not fully understood, positive electric charge accumulates on smaller particles while negative charge clings to the larger ones. Winds and gravity separate the charged hydrometeors, producing an enormous electric field within the storm. This is the source of lightning.

    A hurricane’s winds are mostly horizontal, not vertical. So the vertical churning that leads to lightning doesn’t normally happen.


    Above: An infrared GOES 11 satellite image of Hurricane Emily. Yellow + and – symbols mark lightning bolts detected by the North American Lightning Detection Network. The green line traces the path of the ER-2. Click to view electric fields measured by the aircraft during the flight.

    Lightning has been seen in hurricanes before. During a field campaign in 1998 called CAMEX-3, scientists detected lightning in the eye of hurricane Georges as it plowed over the Caribbean island of Hispaniola. The lightning probably was due to air forced upward — called “orographic forcing” — when the hurricane hit the mountains.
    “Hurricanes are most likely to produce lightning when they’re making landfall,” says Blakeslee. But there were no mountains beneath the “electric hurricanes” of 2005—only flat water.

    It’s tempting to think that, because Emily, Rita and Katrina were all exceptionally powerful, their sheer violence somehow explains their lightning. But Blakeslee says that this explanation is too simple. “Other storms have been equally intense and did not produce much lightning,” he says. “There must be something else at work.”

    It’s too soon to say for certain what that missing factor is. Scientists will need months to digest reams of data gathered in this year’s campaign before they can hope to have an answer.

    Says Blakeslee, “We still have a lot to learn about hurricanes.”

  • theunhivedmind

    Now if this correct about the cell phone towers (mini GWEN towers) then we could see how one could put a block on this system if orgonite really works against these microwave weapons.

    -= The Unhived Mind

  • Yeah, hopefully, maybe even use the new technology against this old analog.. maybe 3=d printers can save the day. as orgonite is only resin and metals in a certain fashion . i mean. with a certain crystal.. why can there not be the ability to make more specific inhibitors of what is in the sky. based on their elemental makeup? Or their nano particle range. resin/metal/crystal. supposedly up to 10,000 ft.. whale . to sigh, as are you. i am skeptical since it has been untried by me. but. maybe this is what we need. though the Don Craft are somewhat scare stories. with nuclear faucets perhaps attached without home owners knowledge. .

  • theunhivedmind

    June 13 2014

    http://www.jimstonefreelance.com

    I have a half hour to post. This is because “they” are already in this town and I had an incident last post.

    Cell tower haarp/mind control confirmed YET AGAIN.

    Jim, Thanks for posting the wiring diagrams for smart cancer meters.
    On par with that is this tidbit. My friend was approached by the wireless industry and tempted with installing a celluar tower on his 200 acre property. It was explained to him what would be there part of the system and was told there would be a 50,000 watt power source. He found out you only need 300 watts to run the cell tower if all it was doing was what it was supposed to be doing. What’s all the rest of the wattage for ? Couldn’t have something to do with behavior modification of the masses (http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2011/12/10/18702414.php). Also check this declassified document out if you haven’t already : http://www.scribd.com/doc/30906628/Bioeffects-of-Selected-Non-Lethal-Weapons. Especially check out this comment on this document:A document entitled “Bioeffects of Selected Nonlethal Weapons” was recently declassified by the US Army in response to a FOIA request by Donald Friedman for information relating to “… the microwave hearing effect, the Frey effect, artificial telepathy and any device/weapon which uses and or causes such effect”.

    The document returned is part of a 1998 National Ground Intelligence Center study on nonlethal weapons technology the rest of which has not yet been declassified. It discusses in broad terms the effects of microwave radiation, laser light and sound on the human body and their potential for use in nonlethal weapons. Microwave heating is discussed, citing a study conducted on Rhesus monkeys at 225MHz. The report dismisses microwave heating as being of limited suitability due to the long ramp up time to have an effect on the target (15-30 minutes). Contrast this with the Active Denial System that works at 95GHz and heats up the water molecules in the skin much more rapidly.

    Microwave hearing is covered next discussing how the effect had been known for some time and indicating that the mechanism is probably due to pulsed RF frequencies causing thermoelastic expansion of the brain region around the cochlea. It goes on to discuss that it is quite possible to cause a voice to be heard in the skull due to this effect referencing a Walter Reed Army Institute of Research experiment which was able to send the words one to ten using this technique. The report suggests it as a possible way of communicating with hostages that their captors would not be able to detect.

    The next technique discussed is disruption of motor control using a very fast pulse (nanasecond) at around the brain alpha frequency (15Hz). This causes disruption of the corticospinal pathways leading to muscle weakness, intense muscle spasms and loss of consciousness depending on the exact frequency. Also discussed is the effect of intense levels of sound (140-155dB) which cabn be used to cause spasmodic motion of the eyes and nausea. Finally the report covers the effects of exposure to high intensity laser radiation.

    In all the report shows that considerable work has been done to understand the potential of electromagnetic radiation as a nonlethal weapon however no mention is made as to the deployment of these techniques in real weapons. (yeah sure,Steve)

    My response

    I do not have time to fact check all of that, so I am letting it fly. A recurring theme on this web site is the drastically over powered cell towers, which are receiving hundreds if not thousands of times the power they need to do their job. Why pump as much power as WLS, (an AM station that can be heard nationwide and internationally) into a two mile region surrounding a cell tower? Often these towers are placed only four miles apart, leaving a two mile range for each one. WHY SO MUCH POWER? Well, I have covered that.

  • theunhivedmind

    The US Air Force’s New Mind Control Wing

    by Peter Quistgard ( p.quistgard [at] yandex.com )
    Saturday Dec 10th, 2011 3:57 PM
    https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2011/12/10/18702414.php

    The use of RF Directed Energy Weapons is roughly similar to other ‘electroshock’ weapons. Just as the cattle prod-like ‘taser’ has been widely adopted in American law enforcement to temporarily disable (or permanently kill) those targeted, pulsed microwave directed energy weapons have been covertly adopted by the US military for remote incapacitation of human targets. More properly classified as weapons of electronic warfare–a type of information war–RFDEW are used for the “jamming” of “enemy information systems” which also happen to be human brains.
    droppedimage.jpg
    droppedimage.jpg

    ‘You come out of the block. You see a fire coming out of the chimneys. You smell this terrible smell – that of flesh as it burns. And someone says, “This is not a factory. This is where they are burning your family.” And you say, “You are mad…”
    –Auschwitz survivor Lily Ebert

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/article-2024836/Lily-Ebert-That-survived-Auschwitz-miracle-Yet-I-here.html#ixzz1V1F9xKus

    Warning: This content may conflict with your programming

    The US Air Force’s New Mind Control Wing

    Tools for Peak Performance?
    Or covert ‘behavior modification’ through torture?

    It would seem that full spectrum dominance of corporate media wasn’t enough for the USA. 
There’s a new sort of electromagnetic targeting going on with covert Directed Energy Weapons.

    Weapons R&D that’s Good for You
    To take at face value the PR material put out by the Pentagon (never a good idea), you might think that the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Program (JNLWP, est. 1997) RF Division conducts a lot of bioeffects research aimed at optimizing pilot performance and the like. Though you wouldn’t normally associate weapons research with such things, you would be forgiven for believing it after seeing on the various websites, fact sheets and other official literature, and even in the research documentation itself, the numerous references to “centers of excellence,” “human effectiveness” and “human-centered” work, etc. For example:

    …”advances in biotechnology, biobehavior, and neuroscience are used to enhance and extend the human performance of our Airmen.” [Air Force Research Lab (AFRL) Factsheet, AFD-090324-032, Biosciences and Performance Div.]

    In this context, it’s easy to forget that the Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate is all about fielding and employing weapons to immediately incapacitate targeted personnel or materiel,” according to the same AFRL literature. So why the contradictory approach? Or has the reader stepped into a minefield of disinformation?

    The predominant focus on performance enhancement in the literature (in relation to ‘Human Effectiveness’) is grounded in past Air Force research lab work concerned with the bioeffects of things like the influence of G-force on jet pilots; claims of research for purposes of meeting safety guidelines are bolstered by the weapons’ sub-lethal nature–by design they aim for effects that minimize the risk of fatality.

    But positive uses of bioeffects research that are very often hinted at are ethical and legal worlds away from the kinds of darkly exotic military research that’s been conducted for much more than a decade now under the cover story of “human effectiveness” or safety, which has necessarily filtered into research descriptions themselves.

    Other reviewers have also noted a ‘semantic strategy’ in the “tendency of the military to refer to ‘non-lethal’ weapons not as weapons but as ‘capabilities’ or ‘technologies’, which extends to individual types of weapons. This … is largely for policy and public relations effect in gaining acceptance of new weapons or even prohibited weapons.” [Davison, N. and Lewer, N. (2005) Bradford Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project (BNLWRP) Research Report No. 7. Bradford: University of Bradford, Department of Peace Studies, p. 37]

    The spin is consistent with the secrecy found to be practiced, for example in the classification of what are normally public documents surrounding a 2002 evaluation report by the National Academy of Sciences’ National Research Council on Non-Lethal Weapons R&D.

    But available research and contract documentation as well as earlier, FOIA-obtained (Freedom of Information Act) declassified material concerning radio frequency directed energy weapons (RFDEW) in particular belie the pervasive pretense, revealing an altogether different story:

    “Disruption of neural control, …convulsions, …seizure induction, …working memory loss, … radiation induced fatigue, sleep induction, …disorientation, …power required to heat a human, …difficulty breathing, …risk of cataracts, …foreshortening of time perception, …blocking of executive functioning, …incapacitation.”

[–from “Bioeffects of Selected Non-lethal Weapons”
USAINSCOM, Fort Meade, 1998]

    Other human bioeffects sought for the new RF weapons have included remote behavioral influence, EEG entrainment (induced brain wave frequency), or how human brain response to certain RF stimuli may mimic schizophrenia.

    Mainstreaming Mengele

    It’s clear from mad science like this, revealed in available RFDE weapons research and development documentation, that it’s all about ways to remotely manipulate human physiology in order to degrade the human effectiveness or performance of targeted individuals, not to improve it. Indeed, this is what the HED (Human Effectiveness Directorate) logo suggests. In this sense, the Air Force’s “human effectiveness” is better understood as a double entendre, with the positive meaning just smoke in the eyes and the real meaning more at “effectiveness on humans” (of the weapons).

    A 2005 AFRL document no longer available on the web gave a straight up description of the actual negative nature of the human effects-based research:

    This research effort is very broad, seeking to investigate incapacitating effects that can be induced through interfering with the human senses of hearing, vision, touch and smell. It will also address the effects of electrical current on various physiological systems including the central nervous system, neuromuscular interface, and endocrine system. Perhaps most profoundly some research will seek to investigate suppressive effects on the central nervous system through, for example, influencing neurotransmitter function. 
–Director of the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate (JNLWD)

    [Air Force Research Laboratory (2005) Research in support of the Directed Energy Bioeffects Division of the Human Effectiveness Directorate. Broad Agency Announcement Number: BAA 05-05 HE. Brooks AFB, TX: Air Force Research Laboratory;]

    Think lab frog tap dancing to electrical shocks.

    Dancing around Humanitarian Law

    Apart from “performance”, the Mengele-like studies are also cloaked in terms suggesting defensive purposes. But if the aim of research like this were truly to protect from exposure, and not to inflict such nefarious if non-lethal effects, surely a more effective route would be to work towards an explicit ban of these weapons and on the electromagnetic manipulation of human physiology, as already called for in a resolution of the European Parliament [Jan. 28, 1999, A4-0005/99], rather than establishing a new military infrastructure to operate them, as has been done in the US.

    Instead, US-led NATO for its part has called for ‘vigilance’ among members against legal restrictions on the use of NLWs. [NATO Research and Technology Organisation (2004) Non-Lethal Weapons and Future Peace Enforcement Operations, RTO-TR-SAS-040. Brussels: NATO, RTO, Studies, Analysis and Simulation Panel (SAS), Chapter 5, p. 4.]

    The JNLWD itself has already been accused (by campaigners) of violating the Chemical Weapons Convention in its chemical non-lethal weapons research and development. [see sunshineproject.org]

    Institutionalized Torture in Military Operations

    But this is not only about research. The technology and weaponry to inflict the studied RF bioeffects is not only under development but has already been patented, fielded and is operational, integrated into the day-to-day functioning of the US Air Force’s “Human Performance” wing. Military radar and microwaves are being trained on tracked (and surveyed) individuals through the operations of the JNLWP divisions, as their very existence and budgets suggest. The true nature of their operations are veiled because they constitute torture, which is illegal under the Conventional Weapons Convention, the Convention Against Torture, Geneva Convention and the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act. Hence the secrecy and the need for cover stories to avoid legal problems. (This may also explain why some of the AFRL’s research does not originate with the Pentagon but with the Department of Justice’s National Institute of Justice, which may avoid contravening international treaties in some cases.)

    The Guantanamo Precedent

    The Guantanamo detention camp has become a standing symbol of the fact that the US has abrogated the rule of law in favor of rule by force. It has more or less openly embraced torture as an element of its “non-lethal” arsenal, with the camp’s physical and psychological torture of kidnapped inmates including simulated drownings, forced injections and medication, sensory deprivation or saturation–to name a few–and multiple alleged suicides of the victims.

    Six out of the eight current US Republican presidential candidates have endorsed the use of torture. As of this writing, the US Senate had passed a bill (2012 National Defense Authorization Act) legalizing the arbitrary military detention and torture of US citizens explicitly (effectively domesticating the 2006 Military Commissions Act.) Already the executive has assumed and exercised the extra-legal right to assassinate American citizens, including juveniles. As the smoke from 9/11 dissipates to reveal the outlines of a new police state, it should be getting clearer now for the American people who the camps are really for.

    Surely it shouldn’t surprise that the US is a human rights violator, despite its loud and righteous hypocritical posturing (as a liberator)–coming as it does from the media mouth of this grizzled old slaver, chronic perpetrator of serial genocides, still on the march, towards its fourth illegal war of aggression in the space of a decade–a prolonged blitz the likes of which the world has not seen since the days of the Nazis, a close relation [see Edwin Black’s War on the Weak].

    Rather than an anomaly, systematic torture has gone hand-in-hand with systematic economic exploitation. But in changing times that challenge future US hegemony–American capitalism’s endgame–the mask has come off together with the gloves.

    Still, the ‘technical problems’ of international humanitarian law remain.

    RF Directed Energy Weapons–

    the Military’s Invisible ‘Taser’ for Dissidents

    The use of RF Directed Energy Weapons is roughly similar to other ‘electroshock’ weapons. Just as the cattle prod-like ‘taser’ has been widely adopted in American law enforcement to temporarily disable (or permanently kill) those targeted, pulsed microwave directed energy weapons have been covertly adopted by the US military for remote incapacitation of human targets. Although loosely analogous to the police taser, an important exception is that the lower voltage microwave directed energy may be applied to the targeted person, such as a political dissident, invisibly and continually over the long-term. More properly classified as weapons of electronic warfare–a type of information war–RFDEW are used for the “jamming” of “enemy information systems” which also happen to be human brains.

    Coming Shift to a Medical Pretext ?

    Former history professor Newt Gingrich, an old Rockefeller hand since his days canvassing the South for the presidential campaign of Nelson Rockefeller, was an early proponent of non-lethal weapons [see following article]. During a recent 2012 presidential debate appearance, Gingrich made a pitch for neuroscience studies, signaling a possible shift in justifying wider research at the federal level, in the name [only] of Autism and Alzheimers, which he cited [as if Republicans were suddenly keen to address the long neglected problem of mental illness in the US].

    The current JNLW program, its secrecy and its awkward pretexts recall the infamous Nixon-Ford era Special Virus Cancer Program (overseen by another Rockefeller hand, Henry Kissinger), in which the AIDS virus was ‘discovered’ following R&D by scientists working in association with the US Army bioweapons lab to ‘search for the cancer virus’ in the ‘war on cancer’.

    Endnote: History has shown us that forms of political organization that are an anathema to universal human nature and its aspirations, upon which international law is based, are destined only for ignominy, in the dustbin of history.

    
From where the impetus?


    …Nonlethal weapons have not received the priority they merit at the Pentagon. This report makes a persuasive case for changing that, said [Rockefeller] Council [on Foreign Relations (CFR)] President Richard N. Haass., Feb 2004
    http://www.cfr.org/world/lack-nonlethal-weapons-capabilities-hindering-us-efforts-postwar-iraq-experts-urge-department-defense-increase-spending-seven-fold/p6794***

    It was under the pretext of health and safety that victims young and old were gassed in the Nazi death camps, where they were told they were to undergo disinfection, in the gas chambers. –Len Horowitz***


    Among the various Rockefeller-funded Medical Institutes involved in the Nazi medical experiments in WWII was the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Psychiatry.

    Acronyms:
    AFB-Air Force Base
    AFRL-Air Force Research Lab
    DOD-Department of Defense
    JNLWD-Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate
    JNLWP-Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Program
    PR-Public Relations
    R&D-Research and Development
    RF-radio frequency
    RFDEW-Radiofrequency Directed Energy Weapons

    WPAFB-Wright Patterson Air Force Base

    –Peter Quistgard

    USAF RFDE Organigram

    by Peter Quistgard Saturday Dec 10th, 2011 3:57 PM

  • keenly

    Do you have any idea was David Rockefeller’s son was murdered in a plane on Friday 13th? I am sure this was NO accident.

Leave a Reply