Kodak Has ‘No Intention’ of Ch. 11 Filing; Said to Weigh Options

By Jonathan Keehner and Jeffrey McCracken – Sep 30, 2011

Eastman Kodak Co. (EK), the unprofitable 131-year-old camera maker, is weighing options including a bankruptcy filing because of concerns raised by possible bidders for its patent portfolio, said three people with direct knowledge of the process. The shares plunged.

Some potential buyers of the patents are wary of proceeding because a purchase may amount to a so-called fraudulent transfer if Kodak is insolvent, said the people, who asked not to be named because the talks are private. A bankruptcy filing isn’t imminent, they said.

“As we sit here today, the company has no intention of filing, and there is no change in our strategy to monetize our intellectual property,” said Gerard Meuchner, a spokesman for Kodak. “We’re not concerned about fraudulent conveyance in regards to the sale of our IP portfolio.”

The company will make a $14 million coupon payment due tomorrow, he said. Meuchner declined to comment on whether the company had discussed a potential filing with law firms, saying that Kodak is “focused on the fourth quarter and on delivering on our strategy to become a profitable, sustainable digital company.”

A number of suitors, such as Google Inc. (GOOG), have signed confidentiality agreements to examine the assets, said the people. If a sale was judged fraudulent, creditors may sue for more money, said one of the people. A bankruptcy filing may help clear the way for a patent sale, said the people. The sale could fetch about $3 billion, MDB Capital Group estimates.
Law Firms

Kodak said in a statement that it is being advised by Jones Day and plans to explore all of its options. The company also has discussed its options with law firms Kirkland & Ellis LLP, the people said. Companies may hire bankruptcy or restructuring counsel to advise on options besides bankruptcy, including debt restructuring, asset sales or operational improvements. Lazard Ltd. (LAZ) is advising Kodak on options for the patent portfolio.

Kodak plunged 91 cents, or 54 percent, to 78 cents a share at 4:15 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading, the biggest drop since at least 1974. Trading was halted four times by circuit breakers introduced following the May 6, 2010, crash to prevent losses in one security from spreading throughout the stock market.
Swaps Jump

The cost to protect Kodak’s debt from default jumped. Credit-default swaps linked to the company rose 4 percentage points to 66.5 percent upfront, according to data provider CMA. That means investors would pay $6.65 million initially and $500,000 annually to protect $10 million of Kodak’s debt for five years.

Kodak’s debt is rated CCC by Standard & Poor’s and Caa2 by Moody’s Investors Service. The ratings are the eighth levels below investment grade at each firm.

A representative from Kirkland declined to comment. Katelin Todhunter-Gerberg, a spokeswoman for Mountain View, California- based Google, didn’t immediately respond to voicemail and e-mail messages seeking comment, nor did an official for Jones Day.

Moody’s cut Kodak’s bond ratings this week and indicated further reductions may follow, citing “ongoing weakness” in the company’s operations. Kodak, which tapped a credit line earlier this month, has seen its market value sink by more than $30 billion from its 1997 peak.

Chief Executive Officer Antonio Perez, who took the helm in 2005, has sharpened Kodak’s focus on the printing business to help revive revenue. Perez announced plans in July to explore options for the portfolio of more than 1,100 patents, including some for processing, editing and storing images.
‘A Conundrum’

“What’s facing Kodak is whether it can give assurances to third-party buyers that they’re not going to get sued,” Mark Kaufman, an analyst at Rafferty Capital Markets in New York, said today by telephone. “Here’s the irony: If they sell the assets for a good price, the issues of insolvency are over. It’s a conundrum.”

A bankruptcy filing “would be a mechanism to get this asset sale done,” said Kaufman, the only analyst among seven tracked by Bloomberg who rates Kodak as “buy.” He values the patents at $2.4 billion.

Kodak’s sales have fallen by half since 2005 to $7.2 billion last year, with further declines predicted this year and next. The company’s losses since 2008 exceed $1.76 billion.
Kodak Origins

Kodak, whose origins date back to 1880, was founded by George Eastman, who introduced the Kodak camera eight years later, according to the company’s website. Kodak has shifted away from traditional film as consumers gravitated toward digital cameras.

Kodak’s top debtholders include Fidelity Management & Research, Fidelity International, Banc One Investment Advisors, Davidson Kempner Capital Management LLC and OppenheimerFunds Inc., according to Bloomberg data.

Fidelity and its affiliates ranked as the largest Eastman Kodak shareholders as of June 30 with a combined 24.4 million shares, most of which was held in the form of bonds that are convertible into common stock, according to regulatory filings. The largest owner of actual Kodak stock was Legg Mason Inc.’s LMM LLC, which held 18.2 million shares outright, the equivalent of a 6.8 percent stake, when the second quarter ended, the filings show.

One comment

  • Kodak is where we get the useless poisonous form of Vitamin E known as the synthetic version from. Its a opposite mirror of the Vitamin E molecular and causes issues with your Vitamin E receptors. This is why if the FDA and The Worshipful Company of Apothecaries want to try to discourage Vitamin E use they’ll use the synthetic version for their studies knowing it will not work. Be careful not to purchase synthetic vitamin E and ideally you should get your vitamin E from foods like Avocado and Olives.

    -The Unhived Mind

Leave a Reply