Many “Cancer Deaths” are from Conventional Treatments Themselves, Not Cancer

Many “Cancer Deaths” are from Conventional Treatments Themselves, Not Cancer

by Paul Fassa
August 8th, 2014
http://naturalsociety.com/cancer-deaths-conventional-treatments-cancer/

Very few dare to write or say that mainstream medical practices such as chemotherapy and radiation cause more harm than good, often resulting in the death of cancer patients. The media eulogizes with how heroic the victim was with his or her cancer. The cancer industry cites how the death was cancer-related to ignore the plausible explanation of toxic treatments that were too much to bear.

In his book, The Topic of Cancer: When the Killing Has to Stop, author Dick Richards cites a number of autopsy studies which have shown that cancer patients actually died from conventional treatments before the tumor had a chance to kill them.

Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez, MD, a holistic cancer healer out of NYC told a humorous anecdote in an interview that reflects this cancer industry madness. While he was interning at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Institute in New York during the 1970s, there was a hall adorned with several plaques honoring those who donated large financial sums.

The donors were close relatives of those who had died while undergoing treatments. He and his fellow interns called it the “Hall of the Grateful Dead”.

What’s leaked out of the medical establishment hasn’t surfaced much yet, but a few medical professionals are admitting that they aren’t really treating many cancer cases. Rather, they’re making them worse.

Even the tumors ‘metastasize by “spreading”’ theory has been challenged. This is because cancers apparently have their own stem cells which are often resistant to conventional drugs and create tumors again, with a vengeance, after an apparent tumor shrinkage that the conventional oncology considers a successful treatment.

It’s a bit like MRSA superbugs that have developed a resistance to antibiotics, yet the cancer industry is set on finding ways to target these cancer cells with more and different toxic drugs. Much of conventional cancer pharmaceutical research is spent on trying to find ways to make chemotherapy drugs less toxic.

There’s no urge to boost the immune system that’s wiped out by chemo or radiation. There’s no regard to nutrition or balancing one’s internal biology. Natural cancer remedies that can discriminate between normal and cancer cells are ignored. The essential chemotherapy approach was derived from WW I mustard gas chemicals. It just kills whatever cells are in it’s path, cancerous and non-cancerous. Hopefully it might spare the patient!

But there’s not enough money in natural approaches for Big Pharma and the cancer industry to consider their empirically proven ‘cure’ rates that pass the five years cancer free standard. Yet with alternative, effective, and safe natural methods that are mostly banned in the USA, 80% of cancer patients who avoided chemo and radiation have been treated. Those who destroyed their immune systems with chemo managed to be treated at a 50% rate.

The meager overall “cure rate” of 3% with conventional methods is often covered with deceptively arranged statistics. Too many cancer patients are rushed into conventional treatments even before they get a chance to look over options, which most are unaware exist, unfortunately.

Thanks to the cancer industry’s suppression of better options, fearful gullible victims help oncologists prosper by paying for the expensive treatments and the chemo drugs which are purchased wholesale and sold retail.

Health insurance helps support the multi-billion dollar cancer industry by paying for overpriced toxic treatments while excluding less expensive, less harmful, and more effective alternative cancer treatments.

Here are some sources of more information for anyone who wants to break free from the medical mafia matrix and fully heal from cancer, or at least die with less agony and more dignity.

Additional Sources:

http://www.cancertutor.com/
http://cancerdecisions.com/
http://gerson.org/gerpress/

Leave a Reply