Military ill-prepared for attack on UK, says retired chief

Military ill-prepared for attack on UK, says retired chief

17 Sep 2016

The armed forces are ill-prepared to defend the UK against a serious military attack, a senior commander has warned the defence secretary.

In a memo before he retired in April as head of Joint Forces Command, Gen Sir Richard Barrons said key capabilities had been stripped out to save money.

He said Whitehall was “preserving the shop window” with items like aircraft carriers, the Financial Times reports.
Defence officials said Sir Richard had backed the last defence review.

The FT said it had obtained the 10-page private memo, which had been sent to Defence Secretary Sir Michael Fallon.
It followed the government’s decision to raise defence spending by nearly £5bn by 2020-21 and its pledge to meet Nato’s target to spend 2% of GDP on defence for the rest of the decade.

Sir Richard said: “Capability that is foundational to all major armed forces has been withered by design.”

He said critical technical and logistical capabilities had been “iteratively stripped out”.

“Counter-terrorism is the limit of up-to-date plans and preparations to secure our airspace, waters and territory,” he said.  

“Neither the UK homeland nor a deployed force could be protected from a concerted Russian air effort.”

‘Dangerously squeezed’

The Army “has grown used to operating from safe bases in the middle of its operating area, against opponents who do not manoeuvre at scale”, he said.

Manpower in all three services was dangerously squeezed and Navy ships and RAF planes had become used to depending on US support, he said.

“Key capabilities such as radars, fire control systems and missile stocks are deficient,” he said.

“There is a sense that modern conflict is ordained to be only as small and as short term as we want to afford, and that is absurd…

“The failure to come to terms with this will not matter at all if we are lucky in the way the world happens to turn out, but it could matter a very great deal if even a few of the risks now at large conspire against the UK.”
‘Sour grapes’

Sir Richard served as head of Joint Forces Command between 2013 and 2016, a role that saw him in charge of more than 20,000 military and civilian personnel across all three services.

It is not the first time a senior British military commander has spoken against defence cuts.

But BBC defence correspondent Jonathan Beale said other criticism had not contained so much detail or been expressed as starkly.

A defence source has questioned the motive behind the release of the memo, wondering if it was “sour grapes” as Sir Richard had been one of the candidates put forward for promotion as head of the armed forces but was turned down.
A Ministry of Defence spokesman said: “Our defence review last year put in place a plan for more ships, planes and troops at readiness, alongside greater spending on cyber and special forces.

“That plan was backed by a rising defence budget.

“And, crucially, it was backed by all of the service chiefs, who were heavily involved putting it together.”

One comment

  • uhm

    Now can you see why New Venice (Britain) is still so gung-ho about going to war with Russia? These fools actually believe they’ll have a conventional war with Russia and China rather than a thermonuclear one. At most these fools believe they can limit a nuclear exchange within Eurasia. If this war goes nuclear (and it will) then rest assured it’ll quickly end up in the thermonuclear extinction of mankind. The British are more psychopathic than the Americans and even the Israelis so don’t think they won’t go there because they will. The House of Windsor and the NVE Empire is collapsing fast and the Most Honourable Military Order of the Bath is blood thirsty and deluded.

    ☆´¨)
    .·´ ¸.·★¨) ¸.·☆¨)
    ★(¸.·´ (¸.*´ ¸.·´
    `·-☆ The Unhived Mind

Leave a Reply