Prostate cancer screening does not reduce death rates, research shows

Findings suggest screenings result in more diagnoses, but does not reduce number of people who die from cancer

guardian.co.uk, Friday 6 January 2012 22.24 GMT
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/jan/06/prostate-cancer-screening-death-rates

Annual screening for prostate cancer does not cut men’s chances of dying from the disease, according to the latest results of a large screening trial.

Comparing men who were screened each year with so-called PSA tests, for prostate specific antigen to those who received their usual care, researchers found that more men in the screening group had been diagnosed with prostate cancer after 13 years – but there was no difference in how many had died from it.

The results support a previous report by the same researchers that found no difference in deaths seven to 10 years after the screening program started.

They are also consistent with recent draft guidelines from the US Preventive Services Task Force recommending that average-risk men not undergo regular PSA screening, according to a researcher who worked on the study.

“Men, if they’re considering screening, should be aware that there’s a possibility that there’s little or no benefit (and) that there certainly are harms to PSA screening,” said study co-author Philip Prorok, from the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland.

Those harms include catching and treating small cancers that never would have been detected or caused men any problems, Prorok told Reuters Health.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 223,000 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer in the US in 2007, the most recent year with available data, and 29,000 died from the disease.

The new findings are from a national study examining the effect of screening for prostate, lung, colon and ovarian cancers.

The data come from close to 77,000 middle-aged and older men, who between 1993 and 2001 were randomly assigned to a regular screening program with six years of annual PSA blood testing and four years of rectal exams, or to their usual care.

For some men, that usual care included cancer screening. The researchers estimated that men in the comparison group received about half as much screening as those enrolled in the annual screening program.

Thirteen years after the start of the study, 4,250 men who’d undergone annual screening had been diagnosed with prostate cancer, compared to 3,815 not in the screening program.

That worked out to a 12% increase in the number of cancers diagnosed with regular screening, Prorok and his colleagues reported Friday in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

However, there was not a clear difference in the number of men who died of prostate cancer over that time period: 158 in the annual screening group and 145 in the comparison group.

That was still the case when the researchers looked specifically at older or younger men, and those that did or didn’t have other diseases.

Prorok said that because the number of cancers diagnosed in the usual care group never caught up with those found through regular screening, the PSA tests and exams that followed likely picked up some cancers that otherwise wouldn’t have caused symptoms or threatened men’s health.

“Somebody who is never going to suffer adverse effects of a disease, if you label them with cancer, you’re kind of doing them a disservice,” said Dr Philipp Dahm, a urologist from the University of Florida in Gainesville, who has studied prostate cancer screening but wasn’t involved in the new report.

And treatment, whether or not it’s necessary, can come with side effects such as incontinence and impotency, he added.

One comment

  • Please remember folks that the PSA test is a complete quack test which is actually very painful and in truth worthless. I highly recommend you stay away from it and opt more for the Anti-Malignan Antibody Serum test based on simple blood work and far more effective. I will tell you now that if you have problems in this region you have Kidney dysfunction whether a doctor can spot it yet or not, the fact is you have problems in that region which need addressing with herbal foods and acupuncture.

    -=The Unhived Mind

Leave a Reply