“Red Alert” Issued After Hillary Clinton Labels All American Parents Sex Criminals

September 21, 2016

Russian “Red Alert” Issued After Hillary Clinton Labels All American Parents Sex Criminals

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

An absolutely shocking report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) is urgently advising that an immediate urgent “red alert” travel warning be issued to all Federation citizens having children traveling to the American State of Arizona after that regions government, with Hillary Clinton’s “guidance”, made it a felony crime of child molestation if parents are discovered to have changed their childs diapers or given them a bath—and that coincides with Hillary Clinton telling all US citizens that their children “belong to the state”. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

According to this report, in a nation long known for bizarre and outrageous laws such as the State of California this past week outlawing cattle from farting, and whose prisons are so overcrowded the largest prisoner strike protesting slave labour in that countries history is currently ongoing, this latest assault against the American people in making it crime for parents to aid and care for their infant children has no parallel in the entirety of human civilization.

Spurring the Ministries outrage against this American State, this report continues, was last weeks Arizona Supreme Court ruling (No. CR-15-0348-PR Filed September 13, 2016) that criminalized any contact between an adult and a child’s genitals, but made no distinction between criminals and parents with this Court stating that for the first time in American history, parents charged with changing their babies diapers, or giving them a bath, would have to prove themselves innocent, instead of the government having to prove them guilty.

This report does note that the Arizona Supreme Court said in their stunning ruling that if prosecutors did charge parents for changing their child’s diaper, they could argue that they were exercising “their fundamental, constitutional right to manage and care for their children”—but to which top US legal experts replied would put every Arizona parent on the sex offender registry and warned that innocent parents will “sit in prison for quite some time” before a higher court vacates their sentence on constitutional grounds.

One of the most insidious “plans/objectives” behind this law making all parents in Arizona (and any parents visiting that State) criminal child molesters, this report says, is that it now gives Arizona prosecutors the power to dangle the threat of a probable child molestation conviction to coerce any parent of a young child into taking a plea deal on unrelated charges—or, in turn, giving their children to the government so they can be raised.

To Hillary Clinton’s “master plan” in overseeing this court ruling against American parents, this report explains, is her belief that only the government is able to raise children—and is voiced by her most ardent supporters who have previously stated: “We have to break through our private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families.”

Supporting Hillary Clinton in her stunning move to take away all children from their criminal parents and put them under her control, once this type of law expands throughout the United States, this report further warns, is the Black Lives Matter organization she supports and who have stated: “We are committed to disrupting the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and villages.”

To the outrage of the American parents who are now all sex criminals for changing their babies diapers and bathing them, this report concludes, is non-existent as the propaganda US media is not allowing them to know about this—but who many will discover fully about it when their lives are shattered as their children disappear into Hillary Clinton’s care and they are left to rot in the great American gulag that in 2015 surpassed the former Soviet Union as being the largest prison system in human history.

2 comments

  • uhm

    The New World Order model for children is exactly the same as within the hidden witchcraft communities and the Chinese model. All children produced by the animator of the corporate strawman slave are owned by the New World Order not the parent. In witchcraft the children are bought up in communes of witches and warlocks and by the age of five they’re classed as adults. Watch as time goes by in the near future as they bring the age of adulthood down from 16, 18 and 21. You’ve seen how they’re already teaching five year old children sex education. In China children are taken by the State and the parents are awarded a payment for the kidnap then the child is profiled (as is happening today in schools) and then prepared for a role in what they’ve been profiled as being able to do. So if the child excels in sports then they’ll be trained as an athlete to represent the nation etc. These are the new models for children because eventually there will not be children produced by the herd and instead all children will be born in a state laboratory environment. Hillary Clinton has removed children from their parents going back from the 1990s in West Africa such as Ghana utilizing the Varkey and Clinton Foundations. The Clinton’s and the Senior Executive Service (true creator of Al-Qaeda) are closely connected to paedophile and snuff networks working through the likes of SOS Children’s Villages.

    ☆´¨)
    .·´ ¸.·★¨) ¸.·☆¨)
    ★(¸.·´ (¸.*´ ¸.·´
    `·-☆ The Unhived Mind

  • uhm

    HILLARY CLINTON: YOUR KIDS BELONG TO THE STATE

    It’s the government’s job to raise your children, Clinton implies

    Kit Daniels – SEPTEMBER 16, 2016
    http://www.infowars.com/hillary-clinton-your-kids-belong-to-the-state/

    The president has the power to “shape our children,” Hillary Clinton said in a controversial tweet that sparked outrage among parents.

    As @FLOTUS said, the choice in this election is about who will have the power to shape our children for the next four years of their lives.
    — Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) September 15, 2016

    “As [Michelle Obama] said, the choice in this election is about who will have the power to shape our children for the next four years of their lives,” Hillary declared.
    That’s something Hugo Chavez or another third-world dictator would say.
    Parents struck back on Twitter:

    .@HillaryClinton LEAVE PEOPLE’S CHILDREN ALONE.
    — Jason C. (@CounterMoonbat) September 15, 2016

    @HillaryClinton @FLOTUS The fact you think it’s government’s job to “shape our children” creeps me the hell out.
    — Kimberly (@conkc2) September 15, 2016

    @HillaryClinton @FLOTUS It’s not government’s job to shape my children – it’s mine.
    — Joe Duffy (@joedarts317) September 15, 2016

    This is the scariest thing I’ve ever heard. https://t.co/4NkfYmDKbd
    — Heather Champion (@winningatmylife) September 15, 2016

    Clinton’s Orwellian notion that the government should take more control from parents to raise the nation’s children has been promoted by the authoritarian left before, perhaps most famously by former MSNBC host Melissa Harris-Perry in 2013.

    “We have to break through our private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families,” she said, adding that kids belong “to whole communities” instead.

    More recently, Black Lives Matter vowed to destroy the nuclear family and replace it with communitarian-style collective parenting.

    “We are committed to disrupting the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and ‘villages’ that collectively care for one another, and especially ‘our’ children to the degree that mothers, parents and children are comfortable,” states BlackLivesMatter.com on its “guiding principles” page.

    And the notion that children should worship the president gained momentum during the Obama administration.
    For example, school teachers in Las Vegas, Nev., forced students to pledge allegiance to a huge, projected image of the president instead of the U.S. flag.

    “Anyone in their right mind will realize that Americans are not supposed to ‘pledge allegiance’ or ‘service’ to a president,” Steve Watson pointed out. “The U.S. Constitution, that piece of paper that Obama clumsily swore to defend and protect, states quite clearly that elected representatives are supposed to act in ‘service’ of the people’s best interests, not the other way around.”

    Similarly, when Obama began his presidency, entertainment celebrities pledged their servitude to the president.
    “The Presidential Pledge is a platform for people across the nation and throughout the world to make a first person commitment of service to our new President, articulating a specific intent or action to become an agent of positive change,” actor Ashton Kutcher said.

Leave a Reply