Senior Officials Rat on Obama Thermonuclear War Drive; NYTimes Disagrees

Senior Officials Rat on Obama Thermonuclear War Drive; NYTimes Disagrees

April 21, 2014 • 5:05AM

Reuters published a very lengthy special report two days ago, under the title: “How the U.S. Made its Putin Problem Worse.” It describes in detail how first George W. Bush and then Obama provoked the Russians to the present point on the brink of thermonuclear war, by surrounding it with anti-ballistic missile sites and by expanding NATO right to the Russian borders, among many other crimes.

“The 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq, without U.N. authorization and over the objections of France, Germany, and Russia, was a turning point for Putin. He said the war made a mockery of American claims of promoting democracy abroad and upholding international law….

“In late 2003, street protests in the former Soviet republic of Georgia, known as the Rose Revolution, led to the election of a pro-Western leader. Four months later, street protests in Ukraine that became known as the Orange Revolution resulted in a pro-Western president taking office there.

“Putin saw both developments as American-backed plots and slaps in the face, so soon after his assistance in Afghanistan, according to senior U.S. officials.

“In 2006, Bush and Putin’s sparring over democracy intensified. In a press conference at the first G-8 summit hosted by Russia, the two presidents had a testy exchange. Bush said that the United States was promoting freedom in Iraq, which was engulfed in violence. Putin openly mocked him.

“‘We certainly would not want to have the same kind of democracy as they have in Iraq,’ Putin said, smiling as the audience erupted into laughter, ‘I will tell you quite honestly.'”

Most of the article’s evidence comes from the mouths of named former senior U.S. officials, including James F. Collins and Jack Matlock, former U.S. Ambassadors to Moscow, and Thomas E. Graham, George W. Bush’s senior director for Russia on the National Security Council. But the impetus and the outlines of the article come from elsewhere. They come from unnamed current “senior U.S. officials,” particularly one such official, who was clearly responsible for the article’s appearance, and who steered the authors as to where to go for their attributed, on-the-record interviews.

At just the time that Obama’s Russia war-plan has failed, his own senior officials are giving away the game,— obviously in cooperation with the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

But the New York Times Disagree—Violently

On the opposite side, the New York Times runs an authorized front-page leak,— in actuality from Obama himself. On reading it, Lyndon LaRouche noted that the Times represents the anglophile (originally Dutch) traitors of Wall Street who murdered Alexander Hamilton.

According to the Times: Obama will make Russia “a pariah state.”

“Just as the United States resolved in the aftermath of World War II to counter the Soviet Union and its global ambitions, Mr. Obama is focused on isolating President Vladimir V. Putin’s Russia by cutting off its economic and political ties to the outside world, limiting its expansionist ambitions in its own neighborhood and effectively making it a pariah state,”

according to “aides.” The late George Kennan is cited in support of this bullshit, which is a pure lie by composition, because they omit to mention that Kennan was absolutely scathing in his attacks against the expansion of NATO after the end of the Warsaw Pact.

“If you just stand there, be confident and raise the cost gradually and increasingly to Russia, that doesn’t solve your Crimea problem and it probably doesn’t solve your eastern Ukraine problem. But it may solve your Russia problem,”
says the neocon former U.S. ambassador to NATO, Ivo Daalder.

Obama’s reported choice for ambassador to Moscow, John F. Tefft, is another provocation, a career diplomat who previously served as ambassador to Ukraine, Georgia, and Lithuania.

In further discussion, LaRouche said that this New York Times leak was Obama’s confession of defeat in disguise,— his confession of his catastrophic collapse.

Other forces will take over from Obama. Obama is finished. Europe and other points say that Obama is finished. A new force will come in to replace Obama,— the Queen of England. The danger is that a real Zeusian force will move in where Obama has failed.

Leave a Reply